Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and othÂers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Habibur Rahman alias Habu and six other convict petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 11.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1656 of 2000 dismis..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - This appeal has been preferred by the State against the Judgment and order dated 18.7.1995 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal no...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of 1996) Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.05.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 01.04.1996 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 47..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......y to-contest the suit and thereupon set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court and sent back the case with the observations as stated hereinbefore to the trial Court. As against the order of remand passed by the appellate Court the plaintiff moved the High Court Division in revisi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......al No. 244 of 2002 has been preferred at the instance of the writ respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore against Judgment and order dated 24.10.2000 in Writ Petition No. 2467 of 1998 passed by the High Court Division upon ana..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......t the time of diluvion and also after alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ......rectness those of. 12. As against the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel of the appellant the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 submitted that in the leave granting order the real question for determination was correctly set forth i.e. whether there was surrender..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. The petitioner is directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. The order of status quo passed on 07.08.2005 vacated. Ed. ......p; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Mohammad Toufique the writ petitioner respondent seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ur above discussions, we are of the view that the judgment of the High Court Division requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ement and contended that the suit property was treated by the Government as abandoned property within the meaning of P.O. 16 of 1972. The suit was barred under Articles 14(c), 23 and 24 of the said order. After liberation of the country Abdul Jalil was found absent from the suit property and he w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n made without any lawful authority and of no legal effect and further directing the writ respondents to return the bank guarantees furnished by the writ petitioners are hereby set aside. Ed. ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- These three appeals by leave filed by the writ respondents are against the judgment and order dated 17.07.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 3773. 4490 and 4491 ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Bangladesh Krishi Bank Vs. A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he impugned order of compulsory retirement of the Respondent No.1 and as such the same requires interference by us. The appeal is accordingly allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......dgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.1994 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Administrative App..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.01.1995 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 39..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......dgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.08.1996 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Judgment: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - This is a petition for review of the judgment and order dated 14.5.2002 dismissing the Civil petition for Leave to Appeal No. 495 of 2000 filed by t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ...... 96 of 1998. Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.-The appeal, by leave, is against the judgment and order dated August 4, 1997 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal (AAT) in Appeal No. 87 of 1996 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......; Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - This of the appeal by leave at the instance defendant-appellants is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.7.2000 passed the High Court Division discharging the rule against judgment and dec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.11.1998 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 45..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J. - The appeal, by leave, is by the defendant No. 1 against the judgment and order dated January 13, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division passed in. Civil Revisi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.-This appeal, by leave, by the defendant has been filed against the judgment and order dated February 27, 1997 of a Single bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 23..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32