Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 661-680 of 3679 results.
Abdul Hashem Vs. Saleh Ahmed & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....allenged the right of executing the bainanama by defendant No. 1 alone as the sole owner of the suit property. This defendant No. 3 also admitted that he along with defendant No.1 transferred certain lands including the suit lands to different persons including the petitioner Abut Hashem. He further......ed in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 303 ......le of the plaint of the suit and in the alternative the plaintiffs also prayed for recovery of possession of the suit property if ousted in the meantime. 3. In the plaint the plaintiffs alleged that the opposite party No.3 (defendant No.1) Sudhangshu Bimal Das son of late Sreemanta Ram Dey as s......s. ...................Opposite parties Judgment July 10, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Mir Hasmat Ali Vs. Birendra Kumar Ghosh and others reported in 16 DLR page 239A. Lawyers Involved: S C. Das—For the petitioner. No o..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Jul, 1984 | Hits: 5
Azizur Rahman & others Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....d by the Munsif, Rajshahi, in O.C. Suit No. 17 of 1975 decreeing the suit in the preliminary form. 2. The plaintiff opposite party brought the suit for partition of her 8 annas share in the suit land comprised of 4 plots with an additional prayer for purchasing the 8 annas share of the defendan......ip;…..Defdt-Petitioner Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others.............Plaintiff-Opposite Party Judgment June 20, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Khirode Ch. Goshal Vs. Saroda 21 CLJ 525; Bota Krishna Vs. Akhoy Kumar, 15 CW......ith an additional prayer for purchasing the 8 annas share of the defendant-in the dwellings house in plot No. 492 under section 4 of the Partition Act. 3. The plaintiffs' case was that the suit land belonged to Amritolal on whose death it devolved upon his two sons Jadab and Madus...... Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Amin Ur Rahmnn Khan J Azizur Rahman & others...…………………..Defdt-Petitioner Vs. Jugal Kishori Sarkar & others.............Plaintiff-Opposite Party Judgment June 20, 1984. ..Category: Family Law | Date: 20 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 2
Abdul Quddus Vs. Anjuman Khatoon & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....rming the judgment and decree of the Munsif, North Raozan passed on 21.9.68 in Other Suit No. 99 of 1966. Basharat Ali respondent since deceased and substituted by his heirs transferred the suit land to Abdul Quddus appellant by a registered kabala dated 20.10.1950. By a contemporaneous oral ag......lip;.Appellant Vs. Anjuman Khatoon & others……………….Respondents Judgment June 9, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Md. Affan and others Vs. Tazal Hoque and 42 others, 27 DLR 58; Rambaran Vs. R......n (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Altaf Hossain J Abdul Quddus……………………….Appellant Vs. Anjuman Khatoon & others……………….Respondents Judgment J......d 42 others, 27 DLR 58; Rambaran Vs. Rani Mohit (1967) AIR (SC) 144; Gladstone Vs. A. B. M. Shayesta (1976) 28 DLR 344; Umar Vs. Fazal Din PLD 1952 Uh. 166. Lawyers Involved: Ahsanul Kabir-For the Appellant. No one—For the Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 571 of..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1984 | Hits: 4
Mokbul Ahmed and others Vs. Bazal Ahmed & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....hury with Ahsanul Kabir—For the respondent. Civil Revision No. 280 of 1983 Judgment Md. Altaf Hossain J. - This second appeal arises out of a suit for declaration. 10.80 acres of land appertaining to R.S. Khatian No.1058 of Mouza Gomai P.S. Rangunia belonged to the Government in......mp; others...........................Respondent Judgment April 26, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shqfiqur Rahman with M. Fazlul Karim—For the appellants. Azizur Rahman Chowdhury with Ahsanul Kabir—For the respondent. ......sh;For the respondent. Civil Revision No. 280 of 1983 Judgment Md. Altaf Hossain J. - This second appeal arises out of a suit for declaration. 10.80 acres of land appertaining to R.S. Khatian No.1058 of Mouza Gomai P.S. Rangunia belonged to the Government in khas. In Settlement Case N......thers...........................Respondent Judgment April 26, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A.K.M. Shqfiqur Rahman with M. Fazlul Karim—For the appellants. Azizur Rahman Chowdhury with Ahsanul Kabir—For the respondent. Ci..Category: Property Law | Date: 26 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 3
Shababuddin & others Vs. Saijuddin & others,1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....or declaration of title and confirmation of possession in the plot No.1292 of khatian No.66 and prayed for injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with plaintiffs possession in the suit land on the allegation that the suit jote belonged to the father of plaintiff No 1 and plaintiff No.......Appellant Vs. Saijuddin & others..........................Respondent Judgment April 7, 1984. Result: The appeal is dimissed. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Aziz—For the Appellant. Syed the Shamsur Rahman- For Respondent Appeal from Apaellate Decre......oque Chowdhury J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26.7.74 passed by the Additional District Judge Khulna reversing those passed by the learned Munsif Second Court Bagerhat on 25.9.72 in Title Suit No. 716 of 196. 2. Plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration of ti......lant Vs. Saijuddin & others..........................Respondent Judgment April 7, 1984. Result: The appeal is dimissed. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Aziz—For the Appellant. Syed the Shamsur Rahman- For Respondent Appeal from Apaellate Decree No...Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 7 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 4
Chatteswari Debi Bigraha Vs. Shirih Chandra Das & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....2 passed by Mr. Jalaluddin Ahmed, Subordiante Judge, 1st Court, Chittagong in Other Suit No. 25 of 1979 directing the defendants 1(a) to (c) to execute and register deed of sale transferring the suit land to the plaintiff on accepting Tk. 47,000/- to be deposited by the plaintiff in the Trial Court ......sion (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. H Rahman J S. Mohammad Ali J Chatteswari Debi Bigraha................................Appellant Vs. Shirih Chandra Das & others..........................Respondent Judgment April 1, 1984. Result: ......lso Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 221 ......he appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Raghumani Roy and another Vs. Bibhuti-Bhusan Roy and others, AIR 1936 (Cal.) 256 ; Pratap Vs. Sree Iswar Gopal Jiew, AIR 1944 (Cal.) 211; Profulla Chorone Requitte and others Vs. Satya Charan Requite, AIR 1979(SC) 1682. Lawyers Involved: B..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Apr, 1984 | Hits: 2
Md. Gafar & others Vs. Azimuddin, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ful owner. A person in long possession can be evicted only in due process of law. including the rightful owner. The plaintiffs and their predecessor have been in exclusive possession of the suit land for over 12 years adversely to the defendants and their predecessor. Plaintiff’s title in...... predecessor have been in exclusive possession of the suit land for over 12 years adversely to the defendants and their predecessor. Plaintiff’s title in 4.24 lands out of the suit land on the basis of registered kabala ext.2 is undisputed and has also been proved. Plaintiffs claim of right on......dgment and decree passed by the Munsif. The plaintiffs brought the suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from entering into the suit land. 2. The plaintiff’s case was that the suit land measuring 8.11 appertains to a holding which totally comprised of 8.34 lands. The ...... Result: The appeal is allowed. Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 54. Obtaining Permanent Injunction-Exclusive Possession and a Prima Facie title is required Possession for more than 12 years can be protected by permanent injunction even against rightful owner. A person..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 3
Jahir Ahmed Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... Khan, the learned Advocate appearing for the defendant opposite-parties opposes the Rule. There is no dispute about the facts of the case as stated above. The subject matter of the suit was nal land measuring 48 sataks appertaining to a raiyati holding of mouza Kulgaon, P.S. Panchalaish, Chitt..........................Petitioner Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor...............................Opposite Party Judgment March 6, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Kulad Ranjan Mawali and others, 31 DLR (AD) 195; ......ister a kabala. The petitioner as plaintiff instituted other Suit No.87 of 1981 in the Court of Munsif, 5th Court, Sadar, Chittagong against the opposite parties as defendants for a declaration that the mortgage dated 30.05.1970 has already been redeemed or alternatively for a decree for s...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Altaf Hossain J Jahir Ahmed............................................Petitioner Vs. Badsha Mia Sowdagor...............................Opposite Party Judgment March 6, 1984. Result: ..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 119
Priyatosh Talukder Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ppellant Priyatosh Talukdar filed an objection against the said application contending, inter alia, that judgment debtor No.5 was living in Pakistan on whom the summons was served. The mortgaged land is not enemy property and therefore the provisions of Defence of Pakistan Ordinance and Rules, ......pellant Vs. Asstt. Custodian of Enemy Property.............Respondent Judgment March 4, 1984. Result: The appeal is allowed in part. The Rules are discharged. Cases Referred to- National Bank of Pakistan Vs. Kushtia Sugar Cane Mills, 29 DLR 32;Goutam Ranj......4 of 1967 the addresses of judgment debtor Nos.1 to 4 have also been shown to be in India. Mr. A.K.M. Shafiqur Rahman, the learned Advocate for the decree-holder appellant also frankly concedes that the judgment debtors No.1 to 4 are Indian citizens since before this institution of the suit and...... Kushtia Sugar Cane Mills, 29 DLR 32;Goutam Ranjan Sen and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981 BLD (A.D.) 126 Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shafiqur Rahman with Mustafa Neaz Muhammad—For the appellant. Kazi Shafiuddin, D.A.G.—For the Respondent No.1. First Misc. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 4
S Joga Maya Debi & others Vs. S.D D. Singh Hazari & others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....;of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 alleging that plaintiff opposite party Nos.1 to 3 Sree Din Dayal Singh Hazari, Sree Durga Prasad Singh Hazari and Sree Arun Kumar Singh Hazari sold the suit land by five registered documents to opposite party No.4 Sreemati Kalyani Biswas, opposite party No.......................Petitioners Vs. S.D D. Singh Hazari & others........................Opposite parties Judgment March 4, 1984. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred To- Ashwini Kumar Karmaker and others Vs. Hari Mohan and others, 36 DLR (AD); 51 ......Baran Deb instituted Misc. Case Nos.82, 83 and 84 of 1982 on 20.2.82 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Chittagong under section 24 of the Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 alleging that plaintiff opposite party Nos.1 to 3 Sree Din Dayal Singh Hazari, Sree Durga Prasad Singh Hazari ......olute. Cases Referred To- Ashwini Kumar Karmaker and others Vs. Hari Mohan and others, 36 DLR (AD); 51 C.W.N. 644. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud with H. Fazlul Karim —For the petitioners. S.C. Das—For the opposite parties 1 & 2. Civil Revision No. ..Category: Procedural Law, Property Law | Date: 4 Mar, 1984 | Hits: 2
Jaharunnessa Vs. Safed Ali Bepary and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....udgment and final decree passed in a suit for declaration of title and for partition. 2. In the preliminary decree the trial Court decreed that the plaintiff would get 19th/288 share in the suit land. On 23.2.72 the plaintiff filed an application for partition through ah Advocate Commissioner. .........................................Appellant Vs. Safed Ali Bepary and others.................Respondents Judgment February 24, 1984. Result: The appeal is allowed. Cases Referred To- Muhammad Ramjan Vs. Fazlul Huq, (1963) 15 DLR 99=P.L.D. 1963 Dacca 987; Krish...... This appeal, by defendant No. 1, has arisen out of a judgment and final decree passed in a suit for declaration of title and for partition. 2. In the preliminary decree the trial Court decreed that the plaintiff would get 19th/288 share in the suit land. On 23.2.72 the plaintiff filed an appli......=P.L.D. 1963 Dacca 987; Krishan Reddiar Vs. Ramanuja Reddiar, A.I.R. 192; Md. 492. Ma Dwe Vs. Ma Tin Lun, A.I.R. 1920(1963) 15 DLR 99 = PLD 1963 Dac 987 Lawyers Involved: MB. Rahman —For the petitioner. Abdullahe Bapi—For the Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree N..Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Feb, 1984 | Hits: 2
Eshaque Ali Vs. Aitunessa & others, 1982, 13 CLC (HCD)
.... daughter, defendant Nos.10-12 and 22-24. Thus the plaintiffs got -/10/- annas share in the 'Ka' schedule property and have been possessing the same. 4. During the S.A operation the land was wrongly recorded in the name of the defendant No.1 Government of Bangladesh as khas land. O......ult: The Rule is discharged. Specific Relief Act, 1877; Section 42; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), Section 115(1) Lawyers Involved: Hemayetuddin Ahmed with P.C. Guha—For the Petitioner. Md. Nizamul Huq with Moslem Alt Howlader—For Opposite-party Nos.......uit was subsequently transferred to the 1st Court of Munsif, Barisal and the same was renumbered as Title Suit No.272 of 1977. 3. The case of the plaintiff-opposite party Nos.1-3, in short, was that an area of 1.01 acres of C.S. plot No.195 appertaining to khewat No.192 originally belonged to F...... The Rule is discharged. Specific Relief Act, 1877; Section 42; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), Section 115(1) Lawyers Involved: Hemayetuddin Ahmed with P.C. Guha—For the Petitioner. Md. Nizamul Huq with Moslem Alt Howlader—For Opposite-party Nos.1-3. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Feb, 1984 | Hits: 4
Sarendra Nath Halder & others Vs. Satyandra Nath Halder, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....99 of 1983. 2. The plaintiffs-petitioners instituted Title Suit No.199 of 1983 in the Court of Munsif, Perojour against the defendants-opposite parties for declaration of their title to the suit land and for confirmation of possession therein. The plaintiffs' case, inter-alia was that the s.......................Petitioner Vs. Satyandra Nath Halder..............................Opposite Party Judgment January 30, 1984. Result: The rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- Makbul Vs. Md. Idris (1969)21 DLR-511; Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil (......Court of Munsif, Perojour against the defendants-opposite parties for declaration of their title to the suit land and for confirmation of possession therein. The plaintiffs' case, inter-alia was that the suit land measuring 70 acres belonged to the defendant Nos.4, 5 and one Laxmi Kanta, the pre......o- Makbul Vs. Md. Idris (1969)21 DLR-511; Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil (1964) 16 DLR 287; Abdus Sattar Vs. Imam Hossain (1976) 28 DLR 256. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum—For the petitioners. Hemayetuddin Ahmed—For the opposite party. Civil Revision No. 7..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 30 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 5
Nezamat Ali Vs. Syed Ahmed Chowdhury and others, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....dhury. They are also joint Mutawallis in terms of the registered Wakfnama Ext.1. 3. The case for the plaintiffs respondents is that late Ahsan Ali Chowdhury created a wakf in respect of the suit land, i.e. 2 annas 6½ gandas of C.S. Plot Nos.779, 824 and 803 corresponding R.S. Plot Nos.43...............Defendant-Appellant Vs. Syed Ahmed Chowdhury and others.................Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment January 18, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Abdur Rahim Vs. Narayan Das Aurora, 50 IA 84; Alla Rakhi Vs. Shah Mohammad, A......reenivasa Reddyar and ors Vs. Rameswami Reddyar and another, AIR 1966 SC 859; Sri Vidya Varuthi Thirtha Swamigal Vs. Balusami Ayyar and others, 26 CWN 537 (P.C.); Srinath Deira Dhamami Vs. Periyanan Chati reported in 40 CWN 90; Surendra Vs. Shree Shree Iswar Bhubaneswari Thakurani I.L.R. 60 Cal. 54 ......Chowdhury and others.................Plaintiff-Respondents Judgment January 18, 1984. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred To- Abdur Rahim Vs. Narayan Das Aurora, 50 IA 84; Alla Rakhi Vs. Shah Mohammad, AIR 1935 PC 77; ILR 56 All. 111=147 IC 887; Ahmadur Rah..Category: Limitation Law, Property Law, Trust/Waqf Law | Date: 18 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 1
Nazir Ahmed & others Vs. The State, 1984, 13 CLC (HCD)
....ed in accordance with Law. Send down the records at once. Syed Mohammad Ali J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 169; 5 BLD (1985) 80. ...........Petitioner Vs. The State.....................................Opposite parties Judgment January 3, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Withdrawal of criminal Case President's Order No. 16 of 1973 Art. 2. Under Article 2 of P.O. 16/73, there is ......ry 3, 1984. Result: The Rule is discharged. Withdrawal of criminal Case President's Order No. 16 of 1973 Art. 2. Under Article 2 of P.O. 16/73, there is nothing to show that the offence in question was committed by the accused in connection with the struggle for nationa...... President's Order No. 16 of 1973 Art. 2. Under Article 2 of P.O. 16/73, there is nothing to show that the offence in question was committed by the accused in connection with the struggle for national liberation. The mere fact that the Government have stated that the accused are freedom f..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Jan, 1984 | Hits: 2
Haji Ali Hossain & others Vs. Badsba Meah & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Altaf Hossain J. - This second appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of title by purchase in benami. 2. The plaintiff Abul Meah, since deceased instituted the suit alleging that the lands described in schedule 1 of the plaint belonged to one Ahmed Ali. Abul Meah purchased the same ...... & others..................Appellants Vs. Badsba Meah & others.......................Respondent Judgment November 23, 1983. Result: The appeal is dismissed Cases Referred To- Joydayal Fodder and another Vs. Mst. Hazra and others decided by the Supreme ......gment Md. Altaf Hossain J. - This second appeal arises out of a suit for declaration of title by purchase in benami. 2. The plaintiff Abul Meah, since deceased instituted the suit alleging that the lands described in schedule 1 of the plaint belonged to one Ahmed Ali. Abul Meah purchased t......Bhim Singh and another Vs. Kan Singh, AIR 1980 (S.C.) 727; Musammat Nurjahan Begum Vs. Mahmudur Rahman Mallik , BCR 1982 A.D. 104 Lawyers Involved: Farmanullah Khan with Mokbul Ahmed—For the appellants. A.S.M. Mofakkar, S.C. Das—For the respondents. Appeal from Appell..Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 3
Sultan Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Islam & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....sive denial without a specific denial, it is taken to admitted. Thus the material proposition of fact affirmed by the pre-emptors regarding 'the fact that if the pre-emption is allowed, the added land will not exceed the ceiling of land the pre-emptor are permitted to hold under the law has not ......Opposite Parties Judgment November 20, 1983. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); Section 21 & 145. Acceptability of previous statement— A party's previous statement regarding a fact in issue is relevant and can be used ag......e of Civil Procedure (V of 1908); Or. 14 rule 1, Or.8, rules 3, 4 & 5. Evasive denial— Whether any issue is raised by such denial— The doctrine of non-traverse which means that where a material averment is passed over by evasive denial without a specific denial, it is take......-traverse which means that where a material averment is passed over by evasive denial without a specific denial, it is taken to admitted. Thus the material proposition of fact affirmed by the pre-emptors regarding 'the fact that if the pre-emption is allowed, the added land will not exceed the c..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 88
Mukhlesur Rahman Vs. Shaukat Ali & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....15 acres and appertaining to C.S. khatian No. 48 of mouza Bagumbari District Dhaka. As Mutwalli the plaintiff is also the owner of two huts thereon. The defendant No. 2 took monthly lease of the suit land from the plaintiff in 1958 on a rental of Rs. 300/-, per month in the name of the defendant No....... Registering Officers are to give certified copies of all registered documents which are admissible for purpose of proving the contents of the original document.. The copies thus given are in so far as the original registered documents are concerned. Where a case for the reception of secondary evid......d without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable. The normal rule of interpretation of section 33 of the Evidence Act is that in criminal cases strict proof ought to be given that the requirements of section 33 h........Defendant-Respondent Judgment November 15, 1983. Result: The appeals are allowed. Admissibility of Certified copy of the registered documents --Proof of the contents of the original document- Registering Officers are to give certified copies of all registered document..Category: Evidence Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 3
Abdul Mannan Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ode of Criminal Procedure, Petitioners' case is that one Abbas Ali Sana lodged an ejahar with Koyra police station on 20.11.81 at 11-30. A.M. alleging that he as bargadar grew paddy in their land on 19.11.81 at about 6-30 A.M. he heard that petitioner No.1 alongwith his men being armed with......;………………………………Opposition Party Judgment November 13, 1983. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- M.G. Towab Vs. The State, 34 DLR page 390. Lawyers Involved: M. A. ......arned Additional Sessions Judge Court No.1 Khulna should not be quashed. 2. This Rule arises out of an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Petitioners' case is that one Abbas Ali Sana lodged an ejahar with Koyra police station on 20.11.81 at 11-30. A.M. alleg&s......Anwarul Hoque Chowdhury J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 38. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Nov, 1983 | Hits: 2
Mrs. Ummida Khan Vs. Salahuddin Khan & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....king it wholly unrealisable which is good for none who would otherwise be entitled to those and that appears to be the reason why legislature had avoided bringing in the courts of persons native land or the court of his permanent house because death may occur any where and by the time the ......ellip;……Opposite-Party Judgment October 23, 1983. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Molla Abdus Sattar with Sk. Ashraf Hossain M. A. Aziz—For the Petitioner. Shaikh Razzaque Ali with Sk. Atiar Rahman—For the Opposite Party......dure filed by Mrs. Ummida Islam Khan wife of late Serajul Islam Khan @ Nasu Khan challenging an order dated 6.6.81 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Khulna, passed in Misc. Case No.48 of 1980 holding that the court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition for Succession Certificate under the p......peditiously. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J. — I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 117. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Oct, 1983 | Hits: 3
92959298929694139297941492907889953893869383938095379137929195307888941890659088