Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- The petitioner A.N.M. Gaziul Azim seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 03.08.2004 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......Nawab Estate of Dhaka for 2.09 acres of land. But on 14th Jaishtha, 1359 B.S. the defendants cut and took away Aosh paddy grown by him from the suit land. 7. It appears that the plaintiff in order to prove the case of pattan have produced Exts.7, 7(a),7(b) and the trial court considered t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
M/s. Standard Match Factory Ltd Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... Judgment: Md. Tafazzul Islam J.-This appeal by way of leave is against the judgment and order dated 27th August, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3430 of 1992 d..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ischarged the Rule. 13. Leave was granted to consider the contentions that the High Court Division misdirected itself in discharging the Rule in that it was no where found that the impugned order dated 14.12.1991 (Annexure-D to the writ petition) was lawfully passed under proper lawful au..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......1998 Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J: The appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated March 30, 1997 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division passed in Civil Order No...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ever took pattan of the suit land from the ex-landlord. Taking advantage of the absence of original land Lord, the plaintiff's predecessors in interest created some antedated and fabricated papers in order to grab the property and plaintiff's or their predecessor had no possession in the suit land. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.-The petitioner A. Motaleb Howlader seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellane..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......t M. A. Aziz J. - This criminal petition for leave to appeal has arisen out of a judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......the University Calendar does not provide any further examination of the answer script. For that the learned Judges of the High Court Division erred in law in passing an administrative order likely to be passed by the University authority through its functionaries for doing the need..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ...... Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment and order dated August 24, 1999 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 135..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ......th him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. [In Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1998]. Criminal Appeal Nos. 12 and 13 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 9-4-1996 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal Nos. 193 and 192 of 1994)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Abdus Salam Vs. Samala Bibi and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For the Respondents - For the Respondents Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 43 of 2001. (From the judgment and order elated 7-12-2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.289 of 1999) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Hotel Agrabad Ltd. CTG Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, CTG & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......5, 27, 31, 32, 34, 36, 7, 39, 43-45, 47-53, 57 & 59 (In C. A. No. 320 of 2002) Civil Appeal Nos. 319-320 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 22.6.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition N..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ...... instructed by Md. Firoz Shah, Advocate- on-Record- For the petitioners Not represented -Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1035 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 06.03.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5226 of 2000.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......p; 16 Not represented- Nos. 2-14 & 17-21 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1818 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 18th August 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Guru Charan Mondal and others Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioners Not represented- Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 541 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 25.6.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1602 of 1994.) ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
State Vs. Omar Ahmed, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ......4. Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1882 of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation And Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ......thers………..Respondent Judgment September 3, 2007. The Bangladesh Biman Corporation Employees (Service) Regulations, 1979, Regulation 11A(2) The order of retirement in respect of the appellant passed by the Bangladesh Biman Corporation under Re..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Alauddin Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e, instructed by Md Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on- Record—For the Respondent. Not represented—Respondent (State). Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 13 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25th July 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1296 of 1994). ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 90