Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....owed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......y to-contest the suit and thereupon set aside the judgment and decree of the trial Court and sent back the case with the observations as stated hereinbefore to the trial Court. As against the order of remand passed by the appellate Court the plaintiff moved the High Court Division in revisi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....f the power of compulsory retirement under section 9 of the Public Servants (retirement) Act and in view of the fact that such an order of compulsory retirement could only be passed by the Government and not by the Board, and there being nothing in the impugned order to the effect that ......al No. 244 of 2002 has been preferred at the instance of the writ respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Jessore against Judgment and order dated 24.10.2000 in Writ Petition No. 2467 of 1998 passed by the High Court Division upon ana..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......t the time of diluvion and also after alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aben Nessa and Lokman son of Giasauddin transferred the land in suit to the plaintiff by the kabala dated January 19, 1970 and since then plaintiff is possessing the land on payment of rent to the Government that there is passage over the suit plot No. 837 and the said path has divided the land ......rectness those of. 12. As against the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel of the appellant the learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 submitted that in the leave granting order the real question for determination was correctly set forth i.e. whether there was surrender..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Chairman, Bangladesh Telephone and Telegraph Board Vs. Mohammad Toufique & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ghbazar and other areas were illegally occupied by trespassers and the respondent No. 5, General manager, Dhaka Telecommunication Region took decision for their eviction under the provision of the Government Lands and Buildings (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance (Ordinance No. LIV of 1965), in s......p; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Mohammad Toufique the writ petitioner respondent seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 08.05.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 97
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Israt Jahan Kazal, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... any order as to costs. Ed. ......ement and contended that the suit property was treated by the Government as abandoned property within the meaning of P.O. 16 of 1972. The suit was barred under Articles 14(c), 23 and 24 of the said order. After liberation of the country Abdul Jalil was found absent from the suit property and he w..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Commissioner of Customs and anr Vs. Bangladesh Traders, Dhaka, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... and the invoice value of the above Hard Boards and MDF Boards are respectively US$ 2.10. 2.05 and 2.00 per sheet and by SRO No. 75 issued on 15.05.99 issued under section 25(7) of the Customs Act, Government fixed tariff value on Hard Board size 8'x4'x3'min, which comes under the Heading No. 441...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- These three appeals by leave filed by the writ respondents are against the judgment and order dated 17.07.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 3773. 4490 and 4491 ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Bangladesh Krishi Bank Vs. A.F.M. Farid Uddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nk. By Ordinance XLIII of 1983 for Article 7 of P.O. 27 of 1973 following was substituted namely: 7. (1) The Board shall consist of the following Directors to be appointed by the Government namely: (a) Chairman; (b) The Managing Director; (c) seven ......dgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.1994 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka in Administrative App..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Sree Promad Chandra Barman & others Vs. Most. Khodeza Khatun Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y, the High Court Division committed error of law in making the Rule absolute, which requires interference by this court. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.01.1995 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 39..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt fixed the suit for hearing on maintainability. Upon hearing only the learned Advocate for the plaintiffs the trial court by an order dated 03.08.1996 held that the plaintiff-respondents being Government employees their relief against the order of dismissal lies in the Administrative Tribuna......dgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.08.1996 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Judgment: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - This is a petition for review of the judgment and order dated 14.5.2002 dismissing the Civil petition for Leave to Appeal No. 495 of 2000 filed by t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....k.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ...... 96 of 1998. Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.-The appeal, by leave, is against the judgment and order dated August 4, 1997 of the Administrative Appellate Tribunal (AAT) in Appeal No. 87 of 1996 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....osts. Ed. ......; Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - This of the appeal by leave at the instance defendant-appellants is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.7.2000 passed the High Court Division discharging the rule against judgment and dec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J .- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.11.1998 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 45..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J. - The appeal, by leave, is by the defendant No. 1 against the judgment and order dated January 13, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division passed in. Civil Revisi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.-This appeal, by leave, by the defendant has been filed against the judgment and order dated February 27, 1997 of a Single bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 23..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- The petitioner A.N.M. Gaziul Azim seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 03.08.2004 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......Nawab Estate of Dhaka for 2.09 acres of land. But on 14th Jaishtha, 1359 B.S. the defendants cut and took away Aosh paddy grown by him from the suit land. 7. It appears that the plaintiff in order to prove the case of pattan have produced Exts.7, 7(a),7(b) and the trial court considered t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
M/s. Standard Match Factory Ltd Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Chittagong, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... is allowed without an order as to costs and the judgment and order dated 29.8.92 passed by the Labour Court, Chittagong is set aside. The Trade Union Case No. 22 of 1988 is allowed. Ed. ...... Judgment: Md. Tafazzul Islam J.-This appeal by way of leave is against the judgment and order dated 27th August, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3430 of 1992 d..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llip;……………………………………………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commer......ischarged the Rule. 13. Leave was granted to consider the contentions that the High Court Division misdirected itself in discharging the Rule in that it was no where found that the impugned order dated 14.12.1991 (Annexure-D to the writ petition) was lawfully passed under proper lawful au..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38