Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6821-6840 of 8188 results.
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......1998 Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J: The appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated March 30, 1997 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division passed in Civil Order No...Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ever took pattan of the suit land from the ex-landlord. Taking advantage of the absence of original land Lord, the plaintiff's predecessors in interest created some antedated and fabricated papers in order to grab the property and plaintiff's or their predecessor had no possession in the suit land. ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.-The petitioner A. Motaleb Howlader seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellane..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......t M. A. Aziz J. - This criminal petition for leave to appeal has arisen out of a judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......the University Calendar does not provide any further examination of the answer script. For that the learned Judges of the High Court Division erred in law in passing an administrative order likely to be passed by the University authority through its functionaries for doing the need..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... settled 41 decimals of land (including the land in suit) to one Taiyab Ali on 10th Baisakh, 1357 B. S. and in his name S. A. record was prepared and he possessed the land on payment of rent to the Government. Plaintiff by the kabala dated August 6, 1963 purchased from Taiyab Ali 41 decimals of ...... Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is plaintiffs appeal, by leave, against the judgment and order dated August 24, 1999 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 135..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1998 has been preferred by the State represented by the Solicitor to the Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh against the judgment and order passed by the H......th him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. [In Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1998]. Criminal Appeal Nos. 12 and 13 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 9-4-1996 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal Nos. 193 and 192 of 1994)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Abdus Salam Vs. Samala Bibi and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For the Respondents - For the Respondents Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 43 of 2001. (From the judgment and order elated 7-12-2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.289 of 1999) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Hotel Agrabad Ltd. CTG Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, CTG & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... below for proper appreciation of the contentions raised on behalf of both the parties. "5. Penalty. - (1) Where any company fails to comply with the provisions of section 3, the Government may, by order in writing, require it to comply with those provisions within such time a......5, 27, 31, 32, 34, 36, 7, 39, 43-45, 47-53, 57 & 59 (In C. A. No. 320 of 2002) Civil Appeal Nos. 319-320 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 22.6.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition N..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....n: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ...... instructed by Md. Firoz Shah, Advocate- on-Record- For the petitioners Not represented -Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1035 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 06.03.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5226 of 2000.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......p; 16 Not represented- Nos. 2-14 & 17-21 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1818 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 18th August 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Guru Charan Mondal and others Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioners Not represented- Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 541 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 25.6.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1602 of 1994.) ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
State Vs. Omar Ahmed, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ......4. Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1882 of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
....tta, at the time of executing power of attorney dated 9.7.1998, was a citizen of Bangladesh by birth as he went to India with a student visa holding a Pakistani passport and that in the case of Government of Bangladesh vs. Ms. Ispahani 40 DLR(AD) 116 and in the case of Government of Bangladesh......nior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondents (In all the cases).
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 95 - 97 of 2007.
(From the judgment and order dated 19.07.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision Nos. 4243 and 4244 of 200..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation And Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....irement in respect of the appellant passed by the Bangladesh Biman Corporation under Regulation 11A(2) of the Regulations is not sustainable as the employees of Biman being public servants only the Government has power to retire them under section 9(2) of the Public Servant (Retirement) Act 1974&......thers………..Respondent Judgment September 3, 2007. The Bangladesh Biman Corporation Employees (Service) Regulations, 1979, Regulation 11A(2) The order of retirement in respect of the appellant passed by the Bangladesh Biman Corporation under Re..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Alauddin Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....1987, he received lease money from the different lease holders and auction purchasers amounting to Taka 1, 31,262 for the year 1394 BS against several OCR's, but deposited only Taka 6,148.13 to the Government treasury by different challans. Accordingly, he was found to have misappropriated the rem......e, instructed by Md Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on- Record—For the Respondent. Not represented—Respondent (State). Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 13 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25th July 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1296 of 1994). ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 90
Sahera Khatun & others Vs. Abdur Rahim SK and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....try. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 21. ......d May 29th, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No 3493 of 1995). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin CJ. - This appeal, by leave, has been filed against the judgment and order dated May 29, 2000 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abdus Salam Mollah Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Shahanaz Begum Vs. Md. Kutubuddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.-This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated March 18, 2007 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 35..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abdul Motalib Vs. Iman Ali Mollah and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... Court and the lower appellate Court correctly decided the issue of limitation. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 123. ...... Appellant. Abdus Salam, Advocate instructed by Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent Nos. 1-3. Ex parte—Respondent No. 4 Civil Appeal No 99 of 1985 (From the judgment and order dated 16.5.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 616 of 1984). ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 119
20272025202420232022202120202019201820162015201420132012201120082006200520042003