Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Mosammat Shefali Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed in Civil Revision No. 3254 of 1992 is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......M. A. Aziz J.- This appeal by leave at the instance of the Salgaria Muhajir cooperative Society Limited represented by its Secretary Md. Abdul Jalil calls in question the legality of the judgment dated 6.1.1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3254 of 1992 settin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......ent: Md. Ruhul Amin J: - The appeal arises out of a petition seeking review of the judgment dated August 17, 2002 in Civil Appeal No.151 of 2000. The aforesaid appeal was filed agai..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ....... 2419 of 1990) Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is plaintiff's appeal by leave against the judgment dated December 8, 1997 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... of 1994) Judgment: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - This appeal by leave arises out of the judgment and order dated 31.07.2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 664 of ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......f 2003) Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- These appeals by leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 12.04.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the high Court Division in Writ ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ...... to appeal against the Judgment and order dated 26.11.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 527 of 2000 dismissing the appeal thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 15.03.2000 passed in Sessions Case No. 28 of 1998 by the learned Sessions ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ......; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Dula @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another filed this petition for leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 18.01.2003 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Crimi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. - Convict petitioner Shahabuddin seeks leave to appeal by this petition against the judgment and order dated 28.10.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Cas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ...... years to 4 years and a fine of TK. 1000/- in default to suffer 1 years rigorous imprisonment more under section 326 of the Penal Code. Previously, the Additional Sessions Judge, Moulavibazar by a judgment and order dated 26.5.1998 passed in Sessions Case No. 143/95 convicted petitioner No.1 und..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......ed J. R. Mudassir Husain J. - Criminal appeal Nos. 14, 15 and 16 of 2001 has been filed respectively by convict appellant Farukur Rahman @ Farook, Sazzad Shaheen @ Prince, Miraj Hossain against the judgment and order dated 9th December of 1998 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......of 1993) Judgment: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J.- This is an appeal by leave from the judgment and order dated 14-11-2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Crimin..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Md. Tafazzal Islam J. - Delay of 398 days is condoned. 2. This criminal petition for leave to appeal at the instance of the accused-petitioner is directed against the judgment and order dated 22.6.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 557 of ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Habibur Rahman alias Habu and six other convict petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 11.05.2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1656 o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......ndent was that of innocence and false implication. 4. The prosecution produced 17 witnesses while the defence did not adduce any evidence. The learned Sessions Judge, Narail by the judgment and order dated 26.11.1991 convicted the appellant Moniruzzaman Kazi @ Thanda Kazi and Sar..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......on No. 2992 of 1996) Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.05.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ P..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......3 of 1981) Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 01.04.1996 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Re..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......Judgment: Md. Ruhul Amin J. - This is defendants appeal by leave against the judgment dated July 25, 2000 of a single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 982..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ......y Education Ordinance, 1961 in respect of the term of their retirement from the service. The Writ Petitions arising out of common fact and law, High Court Division disposed of the same by a common judgment. 2. The leave petitions under the circumstance are disposed of by this single ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......round of limitation since the revisional application was out of time by 238 days and the said delay was not satisfactorily explained. 2. The revisional application was filed against the judgment and decree dated July 16,1995 of the 2nd Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Ju..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27