Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Kanai Lal Roy Vs. Swaraswati Roy, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Kanai Lal Roy.... ..............Appellant Vs. Swaraswati Roy alias Srimati Swaraswati Roy and others............Respondents Judgment October 31, 2004 Lawyers Involved: M.K. Rahman, Advocate, instructe......e with law by giving opportunity to the concerned party to produce the will itself in question and prove it by adducing evidence". There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sree Sukhendu Nath Saha and others Vs. Hamangini Saha, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....llip;……………….Appellants Vs. 1. Hamangini Saha being dead her heirs 1 (a) Swapan Kumar Roy and others……….Respondents Judgment March 21, 2006. Cases Referred To- Mir Laik Ali vs. Standard Vacuum......fs in the land in suit. In view of the discussions made herein-above we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Shamsul Huq Sarker Vs. Enamul Huq Sarker and ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shamsul Huq Sarker...............................Appellant vs Enamul Huq Sarker and ors.....................Respondent Judgment March 8, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huq Sarker(in person)-Fo......on decided the case correctly and no interference is called for. In the premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31), 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....h, TCB Bhaban, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka .........Appellant (in all the cases) vs Md.Abdul Halim Bhuiyan & others (31)..............Respondents (in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2005). Judgment April 27, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate, instr......ty in the impugned orders. The High Court Division, therefore, was not justified in making the Rules absolute. All the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Mainul Islam Vs. State and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Vs The State & another….....Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 189 of 2003) The State & others...............Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 190 of 2003) Judgment October 14, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab all, Advocate o......e find that the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner do not inspire us to lay our hands. The petitions thus appear to be bereft of substance and hence are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....hammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Dulal @ Md. Dulal Talukder and another.............Petitioner Vs The State...........................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Nizamul Huq, Advocate instructed by......with as prayed for. Bail granted earlier be further extended till disposal of the appeal. The petitioners are directed to make the appeal ready for expeditious hearing. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Shahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shahabuddin ..........Petitioner Vs. The State...............Respondent Judgment November 20, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain Advocate-on-...... commit any illegality in rejecting the application filed under Section 561A of the code of Criminal procedure. There is no substance in this petition and hence it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan Vs. Mosammat Nurbanu & another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....afazzul Islam J Abdul Mannan alias A. Mannan..................................Petitioner Vs Mosammat Nurbanu & another ....................................Respondent Judgment November 8, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Obaidur Rahman Mustafa, Advocate ......pports the evidence of P.Ws 1 and 2 strongly. We find no infirmity in the Judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the criminal leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Samar Uddin and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the court) instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Hug, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Not Respondent-Respondent Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 179 of 2003 (From Judgment and Order dated 26.4 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1127 o...... Modaris Ullah of village Goyghar, PS. and District Moulavibazar be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet for a period of 6 (Six) months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Farukur Rahman @ Farook and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....j Hossain...............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No.16/2001) Vs. The State………………………Respondent (In all cases) Judgment August 12, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mujubur Rahman, Senior Advocate......ce to the appellants before us. In the aforesaid premises, we are of the view that the appellants are entitled of get benefit of doubt. As a result, all the appeals are allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Golam Murtuza @ Isphil..........Appellant vs The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment October 20, 2003 Lawyers Involved: Khondoker Mahbub Hossain Senior......ions Jude is erroneous and can not be sustained in law. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the accused-appellant is set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Delip Kumar Shaha Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Delip Kumar Shaha.................Petitioners Vs The State…………………………………..Respondent Judgment February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Re...... and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Since the High Court Division in its judgment considered all the points as raised, the criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Habibur Rahman alias Habu and othÂers Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Habibur Rahman alias Habu and others......................Petitioner Vs The State..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, i......But the courts below did not consider this vital aspect of the prosecution case. Petitioners are directed to prepare the paper book out of court in accordance with rules. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 31
State Vs. Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Appellant vs Moniruzzaman Kazi alias Thanda Kazi..........Respondent (In all cases) Judgment October 20, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney ......commit any error in acquitting the accused. In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in this appeal. The criminal appeal is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
BUET Vs. Dr. Nizamuddin & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ip;…………………………………………………………..Respondents Judgment January 30, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advo...... a disputed question of fact it cannot be considered in a writ petition. For the reasons and discussions made above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Satish Chandra Mondal Vs. Ayjuddin Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....min J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Satish Chandra Mondal......................Appellant vs Ayjuddin Gazi being dead his heirs Amjad Gazi and others.......Respondents Judgment May 3, 2006 Cases Referred to- Ramdhari Rai Vs. Gorakh Rai, AIR 193......rcumstances was well justified to interfere with the same in revisional jurisdiction. For the reasons and discussions above the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sree Subas Chandra Sarker , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y;sented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others..........................Appellants. vs Sree Subas Chandra Sarker being dead his heirs: Indira Rani Sarker.....Respondent Judgment April 6, 2006. Cases Referred to- Perusal Rani Sen Gupta Vs. Bangla......llate Court. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order of costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Chair, Board of Int. & Sec. Education, Jessore & ors Vs. Golam Quddus & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Abdul Monayem & anr..........Respondents (In C. A., No 249 of 2002) Serajul Haque & anr.......................Respondents (In C. A. No 250 of 2002) Judgment May 22, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Sk. Awsaful Rahman, Advocate, instr......g the rules absolute. The judgment therefore does not call for our interference. In view of the discussion made above, the appeals are dismissed without any order of to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ers....................Appellants Vs. Md. Wazed Ali and others………………………………...Respondents Judgment April 9, 2006 Case Referred To- Abdul Mannan vs. Kulada Ranjan Mowa......er alluvion. In the light of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other Vs. Mosammat Miration Nessa and othÂers, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Siraj Mondal @ Md. Sirajuddin Mondal and other.............Appellants Vs Mosammat Miration Nessa and others..................Respondents Judgment March 23, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul karim, Senior Advocate......n established by the plaintiff that Jairuddin did not surrender his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2, 000/- Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35