Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6921-6940 of 8005 results.
Kalitara Biswas Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....lip;.Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment June 10, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— F......Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A. T. M Afzal J Kalitara Biswas………………………………….Appellant. Vs. Mrinal Kanti Biswas and others…………Respondents Judgment......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t below are set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. The original suit will now proceed expeditiously from the stage where it was left. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....essrs. Kohinoor Mercantile Corporation vs. Hazera Khatun and another (14 DLR 47); 14 DLR 47= PLD 1963 Dhaka 238; AIR 1955 All, 353; (1941) 2 K.B. 89. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Miah Abdul Ga......late Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka ………………….Appellant Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others.……………………………………Respondents Jud......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... March 9, 1987 Case Referred to- Muhammad Swaleh V. Messrs United Grain & Fodder Agencies PLD 1964 (SC) 97—16 DLR (SC) 155. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellant. Ex-parte—For the Respondent. Civi......o;s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna…………………………………Appellant Vs. Md. Kobad Ali and others…. ………………&helli......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ......ot to have summarily rejected the application. We condone the delay, allow the appeal and remand the matter to the High Court Division for hearing in accordance with law. No costs Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ses Referred To- Ellal Textile Mills Ltd., 38 DLR (AD) 26; Re Sulekha Works Ltd, AIR 1965, Cal. 98. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed and Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Reco......ed J M. H. Rahman J A.T. M. Afzal J. Amin Scales Limited and another……………………..Appellants (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Yakub………………………&hellip......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nausher Ali Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ellip;…………………………….Respondent Judgment March 16, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. ......y;dhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A .T. M. Afzal J Nausher Ali Sarder & others………………….Appellants Vs. The State………………………&hellip...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Priyatosh Talukdar Vs. Asst. Custodian, Vested & Non-Resident Propty, Ctg & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....- Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose 1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison (1829) 9 B & C. 750, 752. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on......todian, Vested and Non-Resident Property, Chittagong and others .............................Respondents Judgment September 24, 1986 Cases Referred to- Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose 1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison (18...... order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ested and Non-Resident Property, Chittagong and others .............................Respondents Judgment September 24, 1986 Cases Referred to- Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose 1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison (1829) 9 B &..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate Sharifuddin Chaklader, Adv...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....Appellant Vs. Fazal and others………………....Respondents J......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava Kumar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Rafiqur Rahman, S......sion (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh Biman Corporation..........Appellant Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....auda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, A...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J State..........................Appellant. Vs. Lalu Miah and another………………..Respondents. Judgment September 8, 1986. R......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ......C. 47; Hannmant Govind Nargundkar and another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1952 S.C. 343: Hemraj vs. State of Ajmer AIR 1954 S.C. 462: Balbir Singh vs. State of Punjab AIR 1957 S.C. 216; Rajindar Kumar and another Vs. State of Punjab AIR 1966 S.C. 1322; Shivji Geni Mohiti vs. State of Maharashtr..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
...., AIR 1963 SC 786; Zahirul Huq Vs. Ejamul Huq (1982) 34 DLR AD 25; Abdul Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record...... Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..……….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works & others……....... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ices Ltd. v. Westminster Window and General Cleaners Ltd. RPC Vol. 62-63 p. 39; K.M. Multani v. Paramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrar...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Syed S......ry J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respo......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....o-operative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... 33 DLR (AD) 309; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan V. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 338; Muhammad H. Rouf Vs. Ahamuda Khatun 33 DLR (AD) 323. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Abdul Hoque, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not ...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………….Petitioners Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & others………………&......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ...... is that a non-agricultural holding comprising of eight plots recorded in seven khatians belonged to Chuni Lal Chowdhury and Dhirendra Lal Chowdhury in -/2/- anna shares each and to Haridas, Aswini Kumar Chowdhury and Benode Behari in -/4/- anna share each; that Chuni Lal sold his -/2/- annas sha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ip;……………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huque, Advocate-on-Record—For ...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another.........................Appellants Vs. Lasman Dasi & others……………………......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ALL 170; Kettlewell Bullen Vs. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. ...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....6. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record&md......J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nother…………………………………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Hussain, Deputy Attorney General, ins......d J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another……………………&helli......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....Petherpermal ILR 35. Cal.551; V. Konar Vs.R. Konar, AIR 1939 Mad. 894; Kanchanmala Bepari (1954) 6 DLR 254; Mono Mohini Devi (1969) 21 DLR 626. Lawyers Involved: M H Khondkar, Senior Advocate (B. K. Das, Advocate, with him), instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record&mdash...... M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Sufia Khanam Chowdhury………………………….Appellant (in both the cases) Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
16551654165316521651165016491648164716461645164416431642164116401639163816371636