Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 6941-6960 of 8015 results.
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ices Ltd. v. Westminster Window and General Cleaners Ltd. RPC Vol. 62-63 p. 39; K.M. Multani v. Paramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrar...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment August 24, 1986. Cases Referred to- Md. Chand Miah Sowdagar Vs SMH Rahman 1985 BLD 337; Kalu Vs. Sowaria 27 1C 703. Lawyers Involved: Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Syed S......ry J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respo......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....o-operative Society vs. Bangladesh 1981 BLD (AD) 103; EFO Vs. Ram Sanchi AIR 1973 (S.C) 205; Ramana V.I.A. Authority of India A.I.R 1979 SC. 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... v. M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd. AIR 1962 Pan. 370. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... 33 DLR (AD) 309; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan V. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 338; Muhammad H. Rouf Vs. Ahamuda Khatun 33 DLR (AD) 323. Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Abdul Hoque, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Not ...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………….Petitioners Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & others………………&......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ...... is that a non-agricultural holding comprising of eight plots recorded in seven khatians belonged to Chuni Lal Chowdhury and Dhirendra Lal Chowdhury in -/2/- anna shares each and to Haridas, Aswini Kumar Chowdhury and Benode Behari in -/4/- anna share each; that Chuni Lal sold his -/2/- annas sha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ip;……………………………..Respondents Judgment September 2, 1986. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huque, Advocate-on-Record—For ...... Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another.........................Appellants Vs. Lasman Dasi & others……………………......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......e suit property. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ALL 170; Kettlewell Bullen Vs. C.I.T. AIR 1965 S.C. 65; C.I.T. Vs. Chari & Chari Ltd. AIR 1966 S.C. 34; Karam Chand Thapra 80 I.T.R. 167. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. ...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....6. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD 1966 SC 1938. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record&md......J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nother…………………………………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Hussain, Deputy Attorney General, ins......d J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another……………………&helli......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....Petherpermal ILR 35. Cal.551; V. Konar Vs.R. Konar, AIR 1939 Mad. 894; Kanchanmala Bepari (1954) 6 DLR 254; Mono Mohini Devi (1969) 21 DLR 626. Lawyers Involved: M H Khondkar, Senior Advocate (B. K. Das, Advocate, with him), instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record&mdash...... M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Sufia Khanam Chowdhury………………………….Appellant (in both the cases) Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.....T. Swamigal AIR 1922 P.C. 123; Sridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ranadhir S......nim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Chunnu Mia………………………Appellant Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, ......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, 1986. Cases Referred to- Hunoomanpersaud Panday (1856) 6 M.I.A. 393 (PC) Prosunno Kumari Debya (1874-75) 2 I.A. 145 (PC); Maharanee S. Debya (1869) J3 M.I.A.(270) (PC); Palaniappa C..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....a Nandy vs. Bajjnath Jugal Kishore 39 CW.N. 352 (P.C.); Corea vs. Apuhamy A.I.R. 1914 P.C. 243; Culley vs. D.D. Taylerson 11 A & E 1008(1840). Lawyers Involved: S R, Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondkar, Senior Advocate & A. J.Mohammad Ali, Advocate instructed by Sharifudd......sp; Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others……………Respondents ......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ation under the statute, the reason being that the possession of a trustee is as much adverse to the true owner as that of any trespasser." 40. In the case of Adiluddin Vs. Chandra Kumar, 5 FLR (Dac) 302, a learned Single Judge held that possession of a stranger purchaser of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....R 618 (622); Sk. Abdul Latif vs. Malek 38 DLR (AD) 22; Raishaeb Pandit vs. Bombay, Baroda Rly. 39 CWN 552P.C.; D.M.D. National Bank vs. Ataul Huq, DLR (SC) 74. Lawyers Involved: S R Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md. Fazlul Ka...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another……………………………Appellants Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh................................Respondents Judgment A......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....—AIR 1940 PC 105; Mian Mohammed Latif vs. Province of West Pakistan, 221 DLR 98 SC—PLD 1970 SC 180; Abdul Rauf Vs. Abdul Hamid 17 DLR 515 SC at p. 519. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, M. H. Khondker, Senior Advocate and A. J. Mohammad Ali, Advocate with him instructed by Sh......ion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Nur Muhammad & others.....................Appellants Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others.........Respondents Judgment February 18, 1986. ......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....e of prudence, if not rule of law, requires corroboration of such evidence. ………….(49) Case Referred To- Safdar Ali Vs. Crown, 5 DLR (FC) 107. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. B. Hossai......on (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. ......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....rest in the suit land than the lessor………………….(5) Cases Referred to- Prassanna Moyee vs. Kali Das, (1881) 9 Cal. L.R. 347; 31 DLR 107. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, A. J. Mohammad Ali, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Rec......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J Waliullah Munshi…………………………... Appellant Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others………………..Respondent Judgment January 19, 1986.......1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... the trial only. Passing the order of acquittal before the period of limitation under section 339C was over, was not an order under section 339C Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Habibur Rahman Kha......ivision (Criminal) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Mrs. Amena Hoque……………………………………Appellant Vs. Rajab Ali & others……………………………….……Respondents Judgment Apri......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ER P. 1, Captain John Johnston vs. G B. Potts & Co. Ltd. PLD 1967 Kar 496 ; Satish Chandra Banik vs. Dacca Jute Miils Ltd., PLD 1968 Dac 610 at p. 641. Lawyers Involved: Raifique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (Md. Fazlul Haque, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Ssjjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-F...... F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Ghyasuddin Ahmed ……………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ary Estate Officer is the person is the specifically appointed by the Government to sign and verify a plaint or written statement on behalf of the Government. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M. A. Wahab Miah, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Reco......resent: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rah man J A. T. M. Afzal J Maqsood Alam………………………………………….Appellant Vs. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Military Estate Officer, Dhaka Ca...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Srish Chandra Das Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....AD; Planters (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. Mohaluxmi Book Ltd. (1985) 37 DLR 129 AD; Profulla Choron Requittee vs. Satya Choron Requittee, AIR 1979 SC 1682. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam and Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, advocates with him instructed by Syed Sakhawat A......on (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Srish Chandra Das................................................................... Appellant Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, represented by Shebaits: Chandra Shekhar Chakraborty &......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
16451644164316421641164016391638163716361635163416331632163116301629162816271626