Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Dr M A Mazed & ors. Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Solicitor, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....iminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Hussain J MM Ruhul Amin J Dr. MA Mazed & others............................Appellants Vs. Bangladesh, Represented by the Solicitor ..........................Respondents Judgmen......ackground of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 164. ...... by Md Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. Ex-parte-For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated August 14, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Rule No. 88(R) of 2001......ackground of the discussions made hereinbefore we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 164. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 10 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 108
Director General, BWDB and others Vs. BJ Geo Textile Ltd and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
......Petitioners Vs. BJ Geo Textile Ltd. and another……………….Respondents Judgment December 10, 2003. Result: The appeals are allowed. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 Whether Writ petition challenging award of contract is maintaina...... Division in Writ Petition No. 1900 of 2003 making the Rule absolute are hereby set aside and the Rule is accordingly, discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......n:...... Division in Writ Petition No. 1900 of 2003 making the Rule absolute are hereby set aside and the Rule is accordingly, discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:..Category: Others | Date: 10 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 261
Syed Md. Anwarul Haque and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....n (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Syed Mahmud Hossain J Tariq‑ul Hakim J Syed Md. Anwarul Haque and others..............................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others.................................................Respondents Judgment ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 248. ......sp; ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 248. ..Category: Family Law | Date: 9 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 4
Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 209
Govt. of People's Repub. of BD & other Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque & other, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: KM Hasan CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and other ............Petitioners Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque and other ............. 10. We do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners for any interference with the impugned judgment and order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: KM Hasan CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and other ............Petitioners Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque and other ........................ 10. We do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners for any interference with the impugned judgment and order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2003 | Hits: 139
Bangladesh Vs. Dr. Md. Tofajjal Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s also Reported in: 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 59. ......ase was maintainable, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 59. ...... Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others…………......Appellants. Vs. Dr. Md. Tofajjel Hossain….......Respondent. J......ase was maintainable, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 MLR (AD) (2012) 59. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 10 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 164
Serajuddin Ahmed & ors. Vs. AKM Saiful Alam & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....n J Serajuddin Ahmed and others............ Appellants Vs. AKM Saiful Alam and others..................... Respondents Judgment November 3, 2003. The Constitution of Bangladesh 1972, Article 102 (2) Delay or prompt decision taken in the matter of cancellation o...... good conscience." 30. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed with costs in two appeals. Ed. ......ts in two appeals. Ed. ...... good conscience." 30. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed with costs in two appeals. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 3 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 899
Smart Apparels (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Hanvit Bank Kuni Bong Branch and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ds/garments. Thereafter, a person came from Korea and conducted the inspection being employed by the defendant No.1 for and on behalf of. the principal/buyer but, suddenly and mysteriously, he left Bangladesh without informing the plaintiff, At this stage, they also took undue advantage of the su......ces, we direct the trial Court to dispose of the temporary injunction matter within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Smart Apparels (Pvt.) Ltd….. ................Petitioner Vs. Hanvit Bank Kuni Bong Branch and ors………..Respondents Judgment November 2, 2003. ......ces, we direct the trial Court to dispose of the temporary injunction matter within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 2 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 783
Govt. of BD. Rep. by Adnl. DC Vs. AKM Abdul Hye & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Additional Deputy Commissioner...... Appellant Vs. AKM ......; 15. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Additional Deputy Commissioner...... Appellant Vs. AKM Abdul Hye and ors.............Respondents Judgment October 29, 2003. The Limitati......; 15. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 1038
Hossain @ Foran Miah and ors. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... before the Court and how the Courts relied upon it. There is no evidence to show that the medical officer who made the report was dead or was incapable of giving evidence or was beyond the limits of Bangladesh and his attendance could not be procured without much delay. Unless these facts are prove......6 of 1997 against the appellants are set aside. The appellants are acquitted of the charge brought against them and be released at once if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......p; Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: KM Hasan CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Hoque J Md. Tofazzul Islam J Hossain @ Foran Miah and others........Appellants Vs. State..............Respondents Jud......6 of 1997 against the appellants are set aside. The appellants are acquitted of the charge brought against them and be released at once if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 28 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 107
Shamsuddin alias Shamsuddoha Vs. Mvi Amjad Ali & others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....red to- Aminul Islam vs. Mujibur Rahman and others 44 DLR (AD) 56; Haji Golam Hossain vs. Abdur Rahman Munshi 40 DLR (AD) 196; Abdul Jabbar vs. Azizul Huq and others 46 DLR 460; Nader Ali Sk vs. Bangladesh 1984 BLD (AD) 7; Emperor vs. Nazir Ahmed AIR 1945 Privy Council 18; Shafiqur Rahman vs. N......ision No. 72 of 1987 affirming those dated 14‑6‑1987 in NGR Case No. 132 of 1978 passed by the Magistrate, First Class, Cox's Bazar are hereby restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: KM Hasan CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J AS Ahammed J Shamsuddin alias Shamsuddoha.........Appellants Vs. Mvi Amjad Ali and others.....................Respondents Judgment August 27, 2003. The Code of Crimin......ision No. 72 of 1987 affirming those dated 14‑6‑1987 in NGR Case No. 132 of 1978 passed by the Magistrate, First Class, Cox's Bazar are hereby restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 414
General Manager, Bangladesh Bank Vs. Saiyed Shahidul Haque and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....y as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 161. ......se we direct that parties shall bear their respective costs of litigation. Lower Court's Record be sent down as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 161. ......vil) Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J General Manager, Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka Office, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka………………..Appellant Vs. Saiyed Shahidul Haque and others…………………Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The appeal......n proved in accordance with law. 10. Syed Ahmed, Deputy Director of Plaintiff Bangladesh Bank stood on witness box as P.W.1 in support of plaint case. 11. A.K.M. Motiur Rahman, Deputy Director, Engineering Department, Plaintiff Bank gave evidence as P.W.2. 12. Haji Md. Rafiqul Islam as Hold..Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 35
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J A S Ahammad J MM Ruhul Amin J Shafiqul Islam………..............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The peti......d period provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ......llate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J A S Ahammad J MM Ruhul Amin J Shafiqul Islam………..............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The petition is dis......d period provided by law. In the circumstances we find no substance in the petition. The petition is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 37. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 128
DU rep. by its VC Vs. Associated Engineering & Drillers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ing the awarded amount in the form of bank guarantee and the matter got its finality on 30‑6‑1999 when the leave petition was dismissed by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and during the period the awarded money was secured and covered by deposit of the Bank ......sts. The respondents are entitled to realise an amount of Taka 30,35,312 for which the execution case can proceed if the appellant fails to deposit the amount within 15 days from the date. Ed. ......; .......Appellant Vs. Associated Engineering and Drillers ...............Respondent Judgment August 20, 2003. The Code of......ncellor .......Appellant Vs. Associated Engineering and Drillers ...............Respondent Judgment August 20, 2003. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 291
Capital Tower Ltd. Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co operative Market Society Ltd. & ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....R 1975 SC 1810, 9 PLR (Dhaka Series) 477 and 8 BLC (AD) 111,Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya and another vs. Mohshinul Islam and another 53 DI‑R (AD) 79; Sharping, Matshajibi Samabaya Samity vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Hyundai Corporation vs. Sumikin Bussan Corporation and others 54 DLR (AD......previously numbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J AS Ahammed J MM Ruhul Amin J Capital Tower Limited................... Appellant Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co‑operative Market Society Limited and others ...........Respondents Judgment &n......previously numbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 216
Debendra Kumar Saha & another Vs. Uttara Bank Ltd, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Judge, Noakhali and got delivery of possession on 19‑6-1952. Thereafter, the said Bank converted to Eastern Banking Corporation and thereafter converted to Uttara Bank Limited. After liberation of Bangladesh, the defendant did not pay rents regularly and paid rent up to 1384 BS. Thereafter, they ......no substance in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ......ed of agreement, the Court cannot but finds the defendants are tenants at will terminable by notice of 15 days. The principle of terminating tenancy rests primarily on two conditions-one is defaulter and another is bonafide requirement. Existence of any one of these two conditions is suffice to ejec......no substance in both these Rules. In the result, both the Rules are discharged. No cost, Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 253. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 12 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 3
Category: Civil Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 21
Loretto represented by Nasreen Rahman, Principal Vs. Nasreen Sobhan and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....y and for delivery of vacant possession of the suit property in their favour contending, inter alia, that the property described in the schedule of the plaint originally belonged to the Government of Bangladesh and was allotted to the husband of the plaintiff No.1 by executing a registered deed of l....... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ......on) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Loretto represented by Nasreen Rahman, Principal……………Appellant Vs. Nasreen Sobhan and another……………………………&....... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 171
Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others
....ent: MA Aziz J Syed Refaat Ahmed J Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others………………Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………Respondents Judgment July 29, 2003. Resu......rculate this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ......rculate this Order among all the District Magistrates and all the District and Sessions Judges of Bangladesh. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 327. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 11
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......on on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayyed Ahammed J Md. Hamidul Haque J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, internal Resources Division and others………Appellants Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another……&hel......on on acceptance of the customs duty and other levies to be assessed by the Customs Authority is stayed till disposal of the writ petition. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 128