Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7001-7020 of 8005 results.
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....bendra Nath Dutta ……………………...........Respondent Judgment. April 9, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Husain, Senior Advocate instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. K.A. Bakr, ......aluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh Bank .................................Appellant Vs. Debendra Nath Dutta ……………………...........view of the above, the appeal is allowed, the decision of the Appellate Beach is set aside and that of the company Judge restored. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......me barred, with an ulterior object of making illegal gains therefore at the cost of the Bank. (ii) That the respondent in collusion with the transferees, namely, Nurul Hoquue and Amulla Kumar Dutta, allowed them to take possession of the building of the Bank without receiving the b..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Sunil Kumar Biswas Vs. Mohammad Idris and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ip;.Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment April 16, 1981 Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandkar, Senior Advocated instructed by B.C. panday Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellant. Nizamuddin Haider,...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs. Mohammad Idris and others…………Respondents Judgment ......right of Kol-karsha. In the result, we do not find any substance in any of the contentions raised by Mr. Khondker. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with cost. Ed. ......ion (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F.K.M. Abdul Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sunil Kumar Biswas …………………….Appellant Vs...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sanjib Kumar Bose and another Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents Judgment April 22, 1981 Lawyers Involved: S.R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Md. Yasin, Advocate, with him, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record.—......on (Civil) Present: Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sanjib Kumar Bose and another.....................Appellant Vs. Syed Shamsuddin Ahmed and another…………….Respondents ......h Court Division must be reversed. The appeal is allowed, judgment and decree of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. No order as to cost. Ed. ......t. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Dr. Jamshed Bakht Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... vs. Konary Raddy, 1926 I.L.R. 49 Mad. 315; Ahmedbhai vs. Framji (1903) I.L.R. 28 Bom 228; Golapjan vs. Bholanath Khattry (1911) I.L.R. 38 Cal. 888. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. B.K. Das, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pa...... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Jamshed Bakht……………………….. Appellant Vs. Ameaur Rashid Chowdhury…………………Respondent......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......r Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court In view of the decisions of the majority, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Abdur Rouf and others Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ellip;…….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, 1978. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. M.H. Khandkar...... Fazle Munim J And Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Rouf and others…………………….Appellants Vs. Ahmuda Khatun and others...................Respondents Judgment July 10, ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ....... For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the Trial Court are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Bangladesh Freedom Fighters Welfare TrÂust Vs. Burhanuddin Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....lant Vs Burhanuddin Chowdhury.....................................................Respondent Judgment June 11, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Syed Amirul Islam, Advocate, Faruque Ahmed, Advocate with him instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record.&mdas......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ......pellant, a statutory body, is amenable to be impugned in the writ Jurisdiction of the High Court Division. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed without any orders as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 112
A.S.A. Nur Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....istrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca…………………. Respondents Judgment November 24, 1980. Lawyers Involved : Amirul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md, Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ex-pa......ip;…………………………………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Registrar of Joint Stock Companies, Dacca………………......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ge and the Division Bench are set aside. The case is remitted back to the Company Judge for disposal of the matter in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
....p;…………………Respondent
Judgment
March
10, 1981.
Lawyers Involved:
Hamidul
Huq Chowdhury, Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury, Senior Advocates, with
A.N.M. Skahidullah, Advocate, with him instructed by Md. Aftab
Hossain, Advocate-o......unim J
Ruhul
Islam J
Badrul
Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Baitul Aman Co-operative Housing
Society Ltd. and another.....................Appellant
Vs.
Muhammad Shamsur Rahman and
others………………&helli......ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
......ler the appeal is allowed.
The application filed by the
appellants under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure is allowed
We make no Order as to costs.
Ed.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Mohd. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others , 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....al Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 to 146 of 1978) Judgment June 7, 1979. Lawyers Involved: Khandkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, K.S. Nabi, Advocate (on 6.6.79) instructed by.Mr. Khan, Advocate-on-Re cord.— For t......sain CJ Ruhul Islam J K.M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Mohd. Jabed Ali and others.................................... Appellants. (For all the appeals) Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal and others..........................Respondents (In C.A. Nos. 143 ......e dealing with the application under section 96 of the Act for preemption. Therefore, we do not find any substance in these appeals. The appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... the witness at the trial, was siding with the transferees. The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant referred to a decision of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Chandra Kumar Maladas Versus Abdul Motaleb, 19 D.L.R. (S.C.) 36 that the pre-emptor though a co-sharer at t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Md. Mafizuddin Patwari Vs. Abdul Hakim Miazi , 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....aladas vs. Abdul Motaleb and ors, 19 DLR (SC), 36; Wilkinson Vs Banking Corporation (1948) 1 KB, 721 (724). Lawyers Involved: K.A. Bakr, Attorney General, instructed by A, Baset Majumder, Advocate—For the Appellants. Md. Yasin, Advocate, instructed by Mohd. A. Aziz, Advo...... J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Md. Mafizuddin Patwari being dead his heirs Md. Tofaazzal Hossain Patwari and others ………………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Hakim Miazi being dead his heirs Mobaarak Hossain Miazi and others……&h......t had been acted upon. In the result, therefore this appeal is allowed and the petition for pre-emption is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 305. ...... the contrary it had been acted upon so no preemption lies……….(13) Cases Referred to- Kafizan Bibi & ors vs. Naji Farid Kazi and ors, 18 D.L.R(Dacca) 281; Chandra Kumar Maladas vs. Abdul Motaleb and ors, 19 DLR (SC), 36; Wilkinson Vs Banking Corporation (1948) 1 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Uttara Bank Vs. Macneill and Kilburn Ltd. and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Macneill and Kilburn Ltd. and others……………….Respondents Judgment Aug. 8, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, with T. Islam, Advocate instructed by B. Bossain, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Appe......in Ahmed J Uttara Bank …………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Macneill and Kilburn Ltd. and others……………….Res...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside, and the application for temporary injunction rejected. Ed. ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside, and the application for temporary injunction rejected. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Hasan Imam Chowdhury Vs. Govt. of BanglaÂdesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
............. Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others................. Respondents Judgment March 23, 1981. Lawyers Involved: Ahmad Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. S. M. Nurul Huq, ......ddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Rahul Islam J Badrul Haider Chbwdhury J Shaha-buddin Ahmed J Hasan Imam Chowdhury........................... Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others................. Respondents Judgment ......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ion is pregnant with any new issue which requires adjudication in separate proceedings. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Md. Matlabur Rahman & ors Vs. Madan Meah Chowdhury, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
...................Respondent Judgment June 4, 1980. Case Referred to- Ramsarup Das vs. Raeswar Das, AIR 1950 Patna 184. Lawyer Involved: Ahmed Sobhan, Senior Advocate instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellant. M.H. Khondk......Shahabuddin Ahmed J Md. Matlabur Rahman & ors……………………………………… Appellant Vs. Madan Meah Chowdhury ..........................................Respondent Judgment......h Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Order of the Court In view of the decision of the majority the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......h Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Order of the Court In view of the decision of the majority the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Amanullah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....tindra Mohan Tagore vs. Bijou Chand Mahatap AIR 32 Cal. 483; Raghubir Sahu vs. Ajodhya Sahu A.I.R 1945 Pat. 482; Ram Rattan vs. Parma Nand 50 C.W.N. 367. Lawyers Involved: A.W. Mian, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Shafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by...... Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Amanullah Bhuiyan and others…………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Hafiz and ors…..........................Respondents Judgment ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ......m the date the decree is drawn and signed or it becomes executable. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1981 BLD (AD) 210. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Taxes & another Vs. M/s. Mullick BroÂthers, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....………………………..Respondent Judgment February 2, 1981. Result: The review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with Muzammel Huq Bunyan, Rabia Bhuiyan, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain Advocate-on-R...... (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Commissioner of Taxes & another……………………..Petitioner Vs. M/s. Mullick BroÂthers…………………………………………..Respondent Judg......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ......rom want of legal authority. In the result, therefore, this review appliÂcation is allowed and the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Md. Abdul Jalil Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ssain and others………………………..Respondent Judgment February 23, 1981 Lawyers Involved: Anil Chandra Sarker, Advocate, instructed by B.C. Pandey, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Yeasin......ellip;………………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Durjan Ali alias Siddique Hossain and others……………&hel......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ......re-emption. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs. The Judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower appellate court is restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Sreemati Charubala Sen Gupta Vs. Abul Hashem and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ased. Since the petitioners does not claim interest through the testator they got no locus Standi to be added as a party to the probate proceeding……..(8) Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Rouf, Advocate, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For the ApÂpellant. B.C. Panday, Advocat......Shahabuddin Ahmed J Sreemati Charubala Sen Gupta, being read her substituted legatee. Sree Paresh Chandra Deb Gupta………………………………………………………….Appellant Vs. Abul Hashem and others……………………………………………………………â......udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ......udge are set aside and the application for addition of party to the probate proceeding is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 254. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....87: Shearar vs. Shield 1914 A-C. 80S; Sev Charan vs. State of Mysore AIR 1965 S.C. 280; Bisnunrayan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1965 S.C. 1967. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahmudul Islam, Jamiruddin Ahmed, K.Z. Alam with him, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Hug, Advo...... (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Dr. Nurul Islam………………………..Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represenÂted by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Population Control and ot......osts. The decision of the High Court Division is set aside and the impugned order declared to be of no lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 201, 1981 BLD (AD) 140. ......thout any lawful authority. 55. What is malice in law and how it can vitiate an action as discriminatory was consiÂdered by the Indian Supreme Court in the case of The Regional Manager vs. Pawen Kumar Dubey, AIR 1976 SC 1966. In stating what would constitute "malice in law" M.H. Beg, J, who del..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 180
Musharraf Hossain Chy Vs. GM, Titas Gas Transmission & Dist. Co. Ltd. & ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
..... 65 of 1980). vs. Eastern Refinery Ltd. and others.....................................................Respondent Judgment June 12, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In C.A. No. 169 of 1979)......view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......view of the above observations, the appeal is dismissed, the Judgment and order of the High Court Division is upheld. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Bangladesh Steamer Agents Association Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....Bangladesh & ors .............................................Respondent Judgment May 31, 1979. Lawyers involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, with Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocates, Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record.—For t...... Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J K.M.Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Bangladesh Steamer Agents Association...............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & ors .............................................Respondent Judgm...... any lawful authority. Ed. ...... any lawful authority. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 110
15731572157115701569156815671566156515641563156215611560155915581556155515541553