Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Akhtar Begum & others Vs. Mahmudul Haque, Advocate and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....above-established principles of law on the subject, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ahmud, Senior Advocate instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman Advocate-on-Record — For Respondent No. 1. Not represented — Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1190 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 7th August 2004 passed by the H..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Rana Awan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ......rooqui, Senior Advocate (Mohsin Rashid. Advocate with him) instructed by MG Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-3. Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 7th July, 1994 passed by the Hig..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nandi, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented—Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 267 of 2002. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 23, 2001 passed by the High..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 587 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated May 26, 1997 passed by the High ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......d by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. NI Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 14. Not represented—Respondent No. 5. Civil Appeal No. 301 of 2002. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 31, 2000 passed by the High..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Monowara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......afique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 564 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 9-2-2003 passed by the High Cou..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Jainul Abedin Jamal Vs. Qais Huda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......t represented- Respondent Nos. 3-8 (In Civil Petition No. 1675 of 1999). Not represented- Respondent No. 1 (In Civil Petition No. 1674 of 2004). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1674-75 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 17-8-2004 passed by the High..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdur Rahim (Md) Vs. Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itioner. 14. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. In view of the above, the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed....... Respondent No. 1 (In both the cases). Mustafa Niaz Mohammad, Advocate, instructed by Md. Feroz Shah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 2 (In both the cases). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 113 and 114 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 20-7-2002 passed by the High..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......slam, Senior Advocate, (Probir Neogi, Advocate with him) instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-22. Civil Appeal No. 244 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 19-11-1999 passed by the High C..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mainul Hosein, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 2004). Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Md. Nawab Ali, Adv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Agrani Bank. Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......sustained…..(8) Lawyers Involved: MG Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ansarul Hague (in person)—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 323 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 9th January 2001 passed by the H..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......06 giving some findings and observations. 5. Being aggrieved the Election Commission represented by the Chairman (Chief Election Commissioner) filed Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 88 of 2006 and 166 of 2006. 6. The aforesaid Civil Petitions along with the pet..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ...... Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent No. 2. Civil Appeal No. 121 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 26-8-2002 passed by the Hi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Agrani Bank and other Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ....... Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Not represented— Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated January 3, 2000 passed by the Hig..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Abdul Mannan Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......s........................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2006. The Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (V of 1908), Section 100 (repealed) If the High Court Division in second Appeal questions the findings of fact supported by evidence, it exceeds its power. Finding of the A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Fatema Khatun and others Vs. Abdul Quddus, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 721. ......n, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Nazibar Rahman, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Firoj Shah, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 253 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated June 28, 2000 passed by the High..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......Hossain, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. Md. Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on- Record—For Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal 129 of 1998. Judgment: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Vs. Ekushey Television Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns aforesaid, with the above observations the appeals are, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and orders of the High Court Division are hereby set aside. Ed. ......udgment July 19th, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Fida M Kamal, Senior Advocate, (MA Azim Khair, Advocate with him), instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (Civil Appeal No. 385 0f 2003). AJ Mohammad Ali, Attorney-General (Adilur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-Genera..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 266
Yaor Mia (Md) and another Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......d: Chowdhury Md. Jahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Ex parte— The Respondent Nos. 1-2. Dispensed with— Respondent Nos. 3-12. Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated 6th May 1992 passed by the High C..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Yogeshwar Gope Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 982; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 226. ......) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 41 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 12-1-2003 passed by the High Court Div..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47