Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7101-7111 of 7111 results.
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 377 of 1996 allowing the appeal. 2. The plaintiffs instituted Partition Suit No.29 of 1994 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Chittagong for partition of the suit property stating, inter alia,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......s directed against the judgment and decree dated 1-9-1992 passed by the High Court Division in Appeal from Original Decree No. 138 of 1990 affirming those dated 31-5-1990 passed by the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Chittagong in Other Suit No. 124 of 1987. 3. The suit was for a decree o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......y charge sheet was accepted by the learned Magistrate who took cognizance against the accused petitioner along with other accused and the case has been sent for trial before the learned Sessions Judge, Comilla where it has been registered as Sessions Case No. 365 of 2002 and the case has been t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ...... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ......ief Act and directing the Court to dispose of the question of maintainability of the suit before recording of the evidence setting aside the order dated 27.02.2003 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Savar, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 323 of 2002 renumbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 2003 upon its t..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f the judgment of the trial court and thereby the delay of 201 days was caused in filing the revisional application against the judgment and decree dated 9.3.1998 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Artharin Adalat, Dinajpur, in Other Class Appeal No. 72 of 1991. The High Court Division did ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......001 passed in Civil Revision No. 576 of 1991 by a Single Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31-1-1991 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge and S.C.C. Judge, 1st Court, Chittagong Sadar in S.C.C. Suit No. 1 of 1989 decreeing the same...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......s Act but the contemner-appellants did not take any steps for getting the time extended for holding AGMs of the Bank. On an application for extension of time for holding the AGM the Company Judge by order dated 17.5.2003 extended the time for a further period of three months which expired ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......;Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No. 80 of 1997 decreeing the Miscellaneous Case ex parte. 3. The Respondent Corporation herein as petitioner filed the aforesaid Miscellaneous Case under the Special Provision as laid down in President Order No. 7 of 1973 praying for permission for sale of t......n in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 51 of 1998 with Civil Rule No. 410 (F. M.) of 1999 disallowing the appeal and affirming the judgment and order dated 20.11.1997 passed by the learned District Judge, Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No. 80 of 1997 decreeing the Miscellaneous Case ex par..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......ngle Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 of 1998 discharging the Rule obtained against the judgment and order dated November 10, 1998 of the 4th Court of Additional District Judge, Dhaka in বিবিধ (সমবায় স..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Director of Housing and Settlement Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......n Title Suit No. 191 of 1996 of the 2nd Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Dhaka is set aside. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 24 BLD (AD) 56, 9 MLR (AD) 73. ......plication filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing revisional application against the judgment and decree dated November 18, 1998 of the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), and 2nd Commercial Court and Artho Rin Adalat no. 2, Dhaka in Titl..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 189
Aynul Sheikh and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay fine of Tk. 5,000/- each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......re produced by the prosecution while the defence did not examine any witness. The defence plea is that of innocence and implication in the case out of grudge and enmity. 5. The Additional Sessions Judge by judgment and order dated 16.09.1997 convicted the accused Aynul Sheikh and the two appellan..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 97
337335332330326325324323306303302