Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7101-7120 of 8151 results.
Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ...... on the requests of any candidate......(13) Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Election Commissioner, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51; Nurul Islam V. Munsif, Election Tribunal 28 DLR (Dhaka) 375. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instr......icer. There is no basis for the Appellate Tribunal's findings that the 'M' Form was not prepared and submitted to the Returning-officer, by the Presiding-officer in that the Tribunal own order in the Order-sheet showed that 'M’ Form had been submitted by the Presiding-officer to the Returning-offi..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Md. Badrul Alam Chowdhury Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....irman of the Alambiditor Union Parishad No. IX Kishoreganj Upazilla in the District of Nilphamari. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 270 ......ave been interfered by the High Court Division. The Appeal is allowed………(7,8,9) Cases Referred to- (1975) 27 DLR 307; Afzal Khan vs. Election Tribunal and another (1980) 32 DLR AD) 186. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on......, Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Not Represented—For the Respondent Nos. 2- 6. Civil appeal No 96 of 1985. (From the Judgment and Order dated 15.9.85 passed by the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench in Civil Revision No. 228 of 19..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Abdul Hadi Bepari Vs. Safaruddin Mondal and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ot find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 265......ithin the bounds of law. The High Court Division do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order.………..(10) Case Referred to- Shah Wall V. Ghulam Din, (1967) 19 DLR (SC) 143. Lawyers Involved: Miah Abdul Gufur, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain,......, in this case, no adjustment was prayed for and no such question was raised for determination in the trial Court. It is now too late to raise this question in giving effect to the condition in the Order for rateable preemption, the trial Court acted well within the bounds of law. We do not find..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Waliul Bari Chowdhury Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....cluding Printing Press be released at once and the publication of weekly 'Ispat' be allowed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 256....... authentication of a declaration……………..(14) Cases Referred to- Ram Pargas Vs. Emperor, AIR 1948 Allahbad 129; Vine vs. National Dock Labor Board, (1956) 3 All England Report, 939. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate with hi......ord—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hussain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 61 of 1985. (From the Judgment and Order dated 22 5 85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Writ Petition No. 113 of 1985.) ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 226
Md. Shahjahan Sheikh and others Vs. Sessions Judge, Pirojpur and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....of the exercise of revisional power by the Sessions Judge under section 439 A. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ......C. 439 Rajpati Vs. Bashan AIR 1981 (S.C.) 18 Botany vs. Noni Desai AIR 1968 (S.C.) 1444 Attorney General Vs Sillen (1864) 10 H.L.C. 704 Molik Manzoor Elahi vs. Lala Bishamber Das, 16 DLR (SC) 246. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chakla......of the exercise of revisional power by the Sessions Judge under section 439 A. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mohitullah Pk. @ Mohitullah & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... under. Thus both the grounds upon which leave was granted are found to be without any merit. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 240 ......2) Cases Referred to- Jiban Molla Vs. Emperor, AIR 1933 Cal. 551(2), Piare Dusadh v. Emperor, AIR 1944, 1(C). Vtnkatachennaya v. Emperor AIR 1920 Mad 337(FB); Inayat v. Rex, AIR 1950 All 369. Lawyers Involved: Syed Istiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by...... under. Thus both the grounds upon which leave was granted are found to be without any merit. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 240 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannaf Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh & another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decisions the appeals are dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ......ler, 1901 AC. 217; Rakhal Das Addy Vs. Durga Dasi, 17 Cat. 458; Bungsho Dhar Biswas Vs. Modhu Mohudder, 21 W.R. 383 AIR 1941, PC 55, AIR 1947 PC 19, 28 CU 73 B.C., 63, CLJ 410P. C. Supreme Court. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advoca......Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Mohammad Ayub, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 164 of 1983). Civil Appeal Nos. 63 & 164 of 1983. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.6.83 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision Nos. 103 & 153 of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Maherunnessa Khatun Vs. Abdul Latif & another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ent and older of the High Court Division are set aside and those of the trial court are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 196 ......inst the rent…….(15) Cases Referred to- Shamsuddin Ahmed vs. Mohd. Hassan and others (1979), 31 D.L.R (AD) 155; Mst. Esarunnessa Bibi vs. Md. Amir Hossain reported in 38 D.L.R. (AD) 1. Lawyers Involved: M H Khondker, Senior Advocate, A. J. Muhammad Ali Advocate with him instructed ......sed to accept rent. So he sent rent for the month of September and October 1977 by money order which was received by the plaintiff and further remitted be rent for the mouth of November 1977 by Money Order dated 6.12.77. This money order was, however, no accepted by the plaintiff and it was returned..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Abdul Karim Sarker Vs. The State and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ismissed. The order of conviction passed by the High Court Division is upheld but the order of sentence is modified no payment of fine. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 188 ......he door of scandalizing the Courts”……..(22) Action of the respondent humiliating to the presiding officer of a Court, however small it may be, amounts to clear defiance of the Majesty of Law, cannot be condoned legally………(23) Cases Referred to- Asharam M. Jain vs. A.T. Gupta,...... instructed by A. W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1985. From the Judgment and Order dated 28.11.84 pasted by the High Court Division, Rangpur in Criminal Misc. Case No. 24 of 198..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
AKM Ruhul Amin Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985 is allowed. Civil petition No. 140 of 1985 is disposed of. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 172. ......R 287; IDBP (Bangladesh) Vs. M/s. Master Industries (1974) 26 DLR 157; Chera Dangi Mela Committee vs. Md. Yusuf Ali (1977—78) BSCR 254 AD; Amir Sultan vs. Md. K. Alam. (1977) 29 DLR 295 (SC). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Shah Md. Sharif & Mahmudul Islam, Ad......ent Nos. 13 & 14 (In Civil Appeal 53 of 1985), respondent No. 5 (In Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985). Civil Appeal No. 51-54 of 1985 with Civil Petition No. 140 of 1985 (From the Judgment and Orders dated 16.5.85. 21.5.85, 25.4.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka and Rangpur in Writ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Khorshed Alam @ Shah Alam Vs. Amir Sultan Ali Hyder and another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... the appeal is allowed and all the Judgments and orders of the Court below are hereby set aside and the suit is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 133. ...... 48 LA. 114; Sadek Hussain Khan Vs. Hashim Ali, 43 I.A 212; Mohabbat Ali Khan Vs. Md. Ibahim Khan, 56 I.A. 201; Md. Baikder Hussain Khan Bahaour Vs. Shurfoon Nessa Begum, 8 I A. 136; 11 M A 94. Lawyers Involved: Not represented-the Appellant. Khondoker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate......er as to costs. Chowdhury ATM Masud J.- I have gone through the judgments written by Badrul Haider Chowdhury and Shahabuddin Ahmed JJ. I concur with the decision of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By the majority opinion the appeal is allowed and all the Judgments and orde..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Ismail Ullah, being dead his heirs Bazidullah & ors Vs. Sukumar Chandra Das & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....d as defendant No. 49 in the partition suit. In the result, therefore, this appeals as allowed. There will be do order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 125 ......Mills Co. Ltd. V. Graduate Coal Concern Jalgaon, 59 ILR (Bombay) 158; Mahabubul Huq Vs. Abdul Huq, C. P. No. 80 of 1974; Chittoori Subban Vs. Kudapa Subbanna and others, AIR 1965 (SC) 1325 (1332). Lawyers Involved: M. H Khondker, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate......nnot be interpreted to mean something other than what has been clearly decreed by the court. Mr. Khandker argued forcefully that this is a wrong view of the law and placed reliance on section 2 and Order 20 and rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 9. Mr. B. N. Chowdhury, learned Counsel, ap..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Abul Malek, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....table to allow the prayer for amendment. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 115......da Lal Ray Vs. Ramjanam Misser, ILR 21 Cal. 70 corresponding 20 IA 165; Banarsi Debi Vs. The Income-tax Officer, AIR 1964 SC 1742; Radha Krishna Jogani vs. Dwarka Das Agarawalla, (1984)36253 (AD). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instruc......table to allow the prayer for amendment. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 115..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Md. Abu Baker Siddique Vs. S.M.A Bakar & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....d be appointed as his guardian. For the reasons staged above, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 106 ......buddin Ahmed J Md. Abu Baker Siddique.....................Appellant Vs. S.M.A Bakar & others …………………………………Respondent Judgment December 3, 1985. Muhammadan Law—Hizanat (custody of child) Different schools of Muslim thought (Sunni) have difference......cted by Sharifuddin Chaklader Advocate-on-Record. —For the Appellant. Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record —Nos. the Respondent Nos. 1-4. Civil Appeal No. 78 of 1985 (From the Judgment and Order dated 29.5.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in F.M.A No. 184 of 1984.) Judgment..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Hajee Abdus Sattar Vs. Mahiuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s reprehensible, calling for costs of the appeal, but since he got two judgments in his favour, we refrain from awarding any cost against him. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 97...... M. R. in Re. Stringer's Estate, page 384 L.R. 6 Chi; J. M. Singh v. Baldeo Singh. 49 I. A. 299; Currimbhoy & Co. vs. Greet, AIR 1933 (PC) 29; Abdus Satter vs. Suresh Chandra Das, 32 DLR (AD) 170. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-o......s reprehensible, calling for costs of the appeal, but since he got two judgments in his favour, we refrain from awarding any cost against him. Ed.This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 97..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abani Kanta Chakraborty & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s unfounded. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 93 ......possession in the suit plot through lease from the government, the suit plot covering a large area besides the parties claim. Cases Referred to- M.H. Khanddkar Vs. Bangladesh 30 DLR (S.C) 1. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. A. Rouf, Advocate (N.......s unfounded. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 93 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Alauddin alias Alauddin Sarker others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....rder of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge and the trial court is restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 81. ...... SC 147; Lahore Central Co-operative Bank Limited Vs. Pir Saif Ullah Shah, 105=PLD (1960) 12 DLR(SC) 205= PLD 1959 SC 210; Joynal Abedin Vs. Multan Central Co-operative Bank, 1966 PLD (SC), 445. Lawyers Involved: A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-o......eferred to the order of appointment of the respondent, Ext. 1 vis-à-vis various provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1940 and the Rules made there under, along with different Government Orders and Notifications on the subject and has contended that the respondent is purely and wholly..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Shamsul Huq @ Shamsul and others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... conviction is set aside and they are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 75. ...... burden to prove its case is on the prosecution alone. If the prosecution fails to discharge that burden, the accused is entitled to acquittal, even if the defence fails to establish its version. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-...... conviction is set aside and they are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 75. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Vs. Bangladesh Hotels Ltd., 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....above, the appeal is allowed and the judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 70. ......81 are the same, the later was rightly stayed by the Subordinate Judge, Third Court, Dhaka, till disposal of the former case. Judgement of the High Court Division rejecting the order is set aside. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate (Md Fazlul Hague, Advocate with him) instructed.................................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Hotels Ltd.................................Respondent Judgment April 9, 1985. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Shipla Bank Order, 1972 (P.O. 129 of 1972), Article 33 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), section..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
The Commissioner of Taxes, East Zone, Dhaka Vs. M/s. Mallick Brothers, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ore, these appeals are allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 66. ......tion 18 (a). The appeals are allowed. Cases Referred to- Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Fazlur Rahman (1964) 16 DLR (SC) 506; Badridas Daga vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 1949 I.T.R. 202. Lawyers Involved: A. M. Mahmudur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocat......- Record—For the Appellant. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali, Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record —For the Respondent. Civil Appeal Nos. 115-119 of 1984. (From the Judgment and Order dated 8.1.84 & 10.1.84 passed by the High court Division, Dhaka in Application Nos. 6, 7, ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
16241623162216211619161816171616161516141613161216111610160916071606160516041603