Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Goutam Ranjan Sen and other Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......dent Judgment January 8, 1981. Case Referred To:- M/S. Dulichand Omraolal vs. Bangladesh (1981) 33 D.L.R (AD) 30. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A- Rib-II, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor......bsp; Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Goutam Ranjan Sen and other............... Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and......rt, in that, the decision of the High Court is confirmed subject to this modification that the suit shall remain stayed so long the suit property. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Khandaker Ehtehshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ......74 (SC) 151, State vs. Dosso (1959) 11 DLR (SC) 1; PLD 1958 (SC) 533, Nusrat Bhutto vs. Chief of Army Staff and Federation of Pakistan, PLD 1977 (SC) 657. Lawyers Involved: MH Khondker, Senior Advocate (Kh. Mahbub Hossain, Advocate with him) instructed by Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For ...... (1981) 154. ......at the order passed by this Division staying execution of the sentence to continue for further ten days from the date of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (1981) 154. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 292
Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rab, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
.... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ...... respondent who belongs to the disciplined force as defined in the Constitution………….(15,16) Lawyers Involved: B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by M. R. Khan, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellants. S. K. Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aflab Ho...... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ...... the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the writ re-called. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) (19781) 143. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 102
S.Z.M. Nurul Huq Vs. State, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ......lip;………………………………..Respondent Judgment January 14, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid Advocate instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. (In Cr. A. 22/19......1979) K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General, A.W. Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record--For the Respondent. (In both the Appeals). Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate—Amicus curiae. Criminal Appeal Nos. 22 and 23 of 1997. ......that an order passed by the reviewing authority is not revisable under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the result both the appeals fail and the same are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Nani Gopal Saha Vs. Jatindra Lal Chowdhury and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....s an order in excess of its power as provided under Articles 3 and 7 of the President's Order No. 13 of 1972. In the result, the appeal fails and it is dismissed with costs, Ed. ...... Vs. Jatindra Lal Chowdhury and others....................................Respondents Judgment December 11, 1980. Lawyers Involved: B.B.Roy Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate on Record.—For the Appellant. S.R. Pal,......reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F.K.M.A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Nani Gopal Saha ..............................................................Appell......s an order in excess of its power as provided under Articles 3 and 7 of the President's Order No. 13 of 1972. In the result, the appeal fails and it is dismissed with costs, Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 153
Binode Behari Saha Vs. Nitya Gopal Shaha, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ection (1) of section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ......ll. 111, 50 All. 254, Gedi Mai vs. Huna Mal, 1931 Lahore 332, Misa Pramanik vs. Khatu Sonar, 54 CWN (2 DR) 67, Abdul Sheikh vs. Mohammad Ayub, 24 CWN 380 Lawyers Involved: Anil Chandra Sarkar, Advocate instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ex-parte — the Respo......ported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ......ection (1) of section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 131. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 147
Nurunnessa and ors Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Appellants Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others......................................... Respondents Judgment August 27, 1980. Lawyers Involved: M.G. Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B.C.Panday, Advocate-on-Record.—For the ApÂpellants. S.M. Huq, Advocat......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdus Samad & ors Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ...... Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others..................... Respondents Judgment March 18, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Abdul Hamid, Advocate instructed by Md. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul lslam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Abdus Samad & ors…………………&h......ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ......ry…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan......Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellant. Abdus......for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......17 Mad. 185; Venkatraraju, A.I.R. 1943 Mad. 248; Kurgodlgouda A.I.R. 1917 Bom 210; Hamidal, A.I.R. 1921 Bom 67; bhaunath, A.I.R. 1934 Pat. 246(2). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, InstrucÂted by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Appellants. Rafiqur Rahma......Case is also Reported in: ......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ......ment March 23, 1982. Case Referred to- Mohandra Lal Jaini vs. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 (SC) 1019. Lawyers Involved: Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, Senior Advocate instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. K. A......68. ......ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Alim and others Vs. A. K. Abdul Hoque and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......C. 85; AIR 1945 Mad 86; AIR 1948 Bom. 185. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam, Senior Advocate, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Shafiqur ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Sultan Ahmed, AdÂvocate and others Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division dated 5 June 1981, order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 30th November 1979 and the order dated 16 October 1978 of the learned Magistrate are set aside. Ed. ...... Appellants Vs. Haji Sultan Ahmed and others..................................Respondents Judgment July 27, 1982. Lawers Involved: M. Fazlul Karim, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate- on-Record.—For the Appellants. Md. Af...... Ed. ......gh Court Division dated 5 June 1981, order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 30th November 1979 and the order dated 16 October 1978 of the learned Magistrate are set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Govt. of BanglaÂdesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......t Judgment February 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: A Wadud Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, B. Hossain, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by Abdul Wadud Mian, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Rafiq-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Se......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F.K.M.A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Chairman, National Board of Revenue &he......e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett OriÂent Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Chittagong Zone, Chittagong……Respondents Judgment March, 11, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Advocate. Mohammad Hossain, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appe....... Ed. ......esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Messrs. Haji Noor Ali Sowdagar & Sons Ltd. Vs. Comm. of Sales, Tax, Ctg Zone, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....hy;tention of the assessee cannot be accepted. In my opinion the question has been correctly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......hellip;………………………………Respondent Judgment April 13, 1982. Lawyers Involved: M, Hassan, Advocate instructed by S.M, Huq, Advocate-on-Record, — For the Appellant, A.M. Mahmudu...... Ed. ......hy;tention of the assessee cannot be accepted. In my opinion the question has been correctly decided by the High Court Division. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ......Sai Md. vs. W st Pakistan PLR (1958)(SC) 181; Millner V. Raita Commonwealth Law Report Vol 66(1942-43): Basanto Co. Ghosh vs. EmÂperor AIR 1944 (P.C.) 36. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate instructed by A. B. Majumder, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 7......eported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......h V. Emperor, AIR 1939 P.C. 43; S. Kuppuswami Rao V. King AIR 1949; F.C.I. Golzar Hasan Shah V. Gholam Murtaza (1970) 22 DLR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Appellants. Moinul Hossain, Advocate, Jainul Abedin, Adv...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F. K, M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power and Water Resources &hell......ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100