Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 7121-7140 of 8188 results.

Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Sa­mity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....Khan, Senior Advocate, M.R. Wahab Mia, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 3. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1986. (From the judgment and order dated 23.4.1986 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench in Writ Petition No. 179 of 198......asmuch as the previous rent was Tk. 72,000/00 and calculating enhanced rent of 50% the total would come to Tk.1,08,000/00 and not Tk. 1,30,000/00 as was worked out. This position was accepted by the Government and the appellant was allowed to pay rent at Tk. 1, 08,000/00 per year vide Annexure E (1..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87

Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corpo­ration, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....ior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court, with him instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Respon­dent. Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 21-8-84 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Civil Revision No.3 of 1984). J......a and create a boundary wall but they were prevented from doing so by defendant No. 2 and his wife defendant No. 1 Defendant No. 2 in the meantime wrote a letter (Ext. 4) to the Minister of Commerce, Government of Bangladesh, alleging that the transaction under the conveyance, Ext. 1, was not a sale..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104

Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

.... Aswini got his jama split up In Miscellaneous Case No. 236 of 1963-66. Benode got his jama split up in Miscellaneous Case No. 273 of 1965-66. 4. The trial Court allowed pre-emption and that order was affirmed by the appellate Court. In revision the learned Single Judge of the High Court D......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43

Sree Gopal Chandra Mondal and another Vs. Lasman Dasi & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

.... Miah A. Gafur, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents No. 3. Ex parte—For  Respondent Nos. 1—2 and 4. Civil appeal No 79 of 1984. (From the judgment and order dated 7th January, 1982 passed by the High Court Division in S.A. No. 305 of 1978.) Ju......e suit pro­perty. The High Court Division correctly affirmed the decision of the appellate court. We find no substance in this appeal and, ac­cordingly, it is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37

Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....Advocate, instruc­ted by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Exparte —For Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 15 or 1983. (From the judgment and order dated 11th January 1984 passed by the High Court Division Dhaka Bench, in Application No. 24...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....nch of the High Court Division, Dhaka (Mr. Justice Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury & Mr. Justice Amin-ur-Rahman Khan) on 22nd August 1984 dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellants against an order of injunction and attachment passed by the District Judge. Dhaka on 27.3.84 in mis­cella......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100

Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....eral, instructed by Zinnur, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—For the Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 29th September, 1983 passed by the High Court Division, Comilla Bench in Criminal appe......nd allow the appeal. The appell­ants are acquitted of the charge leveled aga­inst them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chow­dhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....sfer and a decree. Section 39 provides for declaration of nullity of a written instrument in the words 'adjudge it so" void; it also provides that the court ‘in its discretion’ may order the instrument, when adjudged void to be delivered up or cancelled. From the provision it is ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is resto­red. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86

Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Be­gum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)

....to the extent of 5 pakhis 2 gondas 2 karas and 2 krants out of the lands shown in the schedule. Defendants preferred Second Appeal No. 368 of 1974. The learned Single Judge affi­rmed the order of the appellate court below and dismissed the appeal. Leave was granted to consider t......name was mutated in the landlord's Sherista nor did he possess the land nor paid any rent but Jobbed  alone possessed the entire land and paid rent first to the landlord and then to the  Government after State Acquisition. By the two Mortgage-deeds (as referred to above) Jobeda and her..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50

Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Commit­tee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....ht of collec­ting rent and tax only as in the mean­time the defendant 1 and his brother ac­quired tenancy right by adverse possession." The appellate court below though affir­med the judgment and order of the trial court took the view that the questions of adverse possession does not arise in th...... and the superior landlord and the defendants possessed the suit land openly and adversely. They further pleaded that after the acquisition of the rent receiving interests the said land vested in the Government and the defendants had become tenants directly under the Government and the Government ha..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34

Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....se Natural Justice Section 14A of the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act has, in clear and unmistakable terms put an express embargo on entertainment of any suit or application against any order or action under the Act…………..(20) The Act itself provides remedy for any mala fide ......porary injunction restraining defendants from dispossessing them till the disposal of the suit. 3. Plaintiffs' predecessor purchased the suit land in 1929 and had been in possession on payment of Government revenue. P.S. khatian stand in the names of plaintiff who made construction of a one-stor..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48

Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

.... the Penal Code, the question for consideration is whether the conviction was based on correct assessment of evidence according to rule of evidence and recognized prin­ciples of criminal trials. The order of convi­ction was passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mymensingh, on 13 November 1981 a......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56

Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....vely have its intended effect on the validity of the lease by the Government has quite rightly been foreseen by the appellant. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed; the judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the suit being T.S. No. 181 of 1979 of the Court ......is true, not a suit for title or pos­session but for a declaration that the suit land is not vested and non-resident property and that being so relief is sought against the Go­vernment. Had not the Government in the meantime leased out the suit land to anybody, obviously no such interest would hav..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42

Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.……Respondents Judgment April 22, 1986. The Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898), sections 265H, 265F, 265C & 339C The Sessions Judge cannot pass an order of acquittal without complying with the provisions under section 265F Cr.P.C. In a cri......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38

Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....ondents Judgment March 24, 1986. The Companies Act, 1913 (VII of 1913), sections 79(3) and 76(3) Having regard to the powers conferred under sections 76 (d) and 79 (d), the Court may order a meeting of the company only under the conditions provided under those provisions. Be...... of the learned Company Judge are modified ac­cordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111

Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....al Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Ex-parte—for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1986. (From the judgment and order dated 11.7.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench, in Civil Order Case No. 497 of 1......nton­ment, Ministry of Defense & others………………………Respondent Judgment Augusr 3, 1986. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXVII, rr. 1 & 2 The Government by a Noti­fication dated 14th December, 1955, authorised certain officers to sign and ve..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108

Srish Chandra Das Vs. Sri Sri Chatteswari Debi Bigraha, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....hese facts and circumstances and for reasons stated above, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ......e judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial Court restored. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 283. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88

A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

.... this provision of section 494 of the Code the Public Prosecutor alone is authorised to file an application for withdrawn of a case from the prosecution. In this case the Magistrate having passed the order of withdrawal without any application from the Public Prosecutor is an illegality and such ord......owing the accused absconding, and though warrant of arrest was issued against them by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Dhaka, they never appeared in the Court, stead, on there behalf an order of the Government under the signature of a Section Off was produced before the Magistrate. It was to the ef..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71

Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....¦â€¦.....Respondents Judgment March 6, 1986. Result: The appeal is dismissed. The Local Government (Union Parishad) Rules, 1953, Rule 49 Re-counting of ballot papers. A Tribunal ordering fresh election in one centre without declaring result of the election void, is illegal…â€......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Appellant Vs. Md. Sadeq & another …………………………….....Respondents Judgment March 6, 1986. Result: The appeal is dismissed. The Local Government (Union Parishad) Rules, 1953, Rule 49 Re-counting of ballot papers. A Tribunal orde..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140

Md. Badrul Alam Chowdhury Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)

....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Respondents Judgment January 19, 1984. The Union Parishads (Election) Rule, rules 38(3), 39 (1) (4), 45(a) The Returning Officer had no jurisdiction to pass any order of recounting of votes. The Election disputes are ad-hoc disputes. Each case is to be decided ......is directed against the judg­ment and order passed by the High Court Division, Rangpur Bench, in Civil Revision No. 228 of 1985. Appellant filed an election petition under section 26 of the Local Government (Union Parishad) Ordinance No. LI of 1983 before the Election Tribunal challenging the ej..

Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 126