Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7141-7160 of 8005 results.
Government of Bangladesh and other Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....rty has a preferential claim to lease than the stranger……(6) Lawyers Involved: B Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed Mvi Md Wahidullah—Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Nor represented—The Respond......sp; Government of Bangladesh and other…… Petitioners Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others………………........e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ......e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....ry matter and the High Court Division exercised the discretion in favour of the Government respondent so the Appellate Division has nothing to interfere. Lawyers Involved: Md. Zahedul Bari, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—Fo......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Khairullah (Md)………………….Petitioner Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another…………. Respondents. Judgment May 24, 2001. Result...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
AKM Ali Imam Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....unal was declaratory without any direction for reinstatement and as such the said order is not executable. Lawyers Involved: MA Tariq, Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. ......sp; AKM Ali Imam......................................Petitioner Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another....................There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 104
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Cases Referred To- Sonali Bank vs. Ruhul Amin Khan, 46 DLR (AD) 85. Agrani Bank vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 56 DLR (AD) 136. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Prab......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Badrudduza, 56 DLR (AD) 136. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Prabir Kumar Neogi, Advocate, instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent Nos.1-5..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... others Vs. Moulavi Md. Hasan and others, 43 DLR, 242; Monirunnahar Begum and others Vs. Shahed Alt and others (1981) 1 BCR (HCD), 43. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Md. N......e Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respond....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
................................... Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others…….................. Respondents Lawyers Involved: Mr. Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- Respondents Judgment ......hury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karirn J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahamed J M/S. Noor Crokaries and another................................ Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others…….................. Respondents ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... DLR (AD) 82. Kazi Md. Amirul Islam vs. Bangladesh 16 BLD (AD) 110;Kazi Imamuddin Bhuiya Vs. Bangladesh 10 BLC (AD) 2005 page 134. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad All, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant &...... Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 Ja......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ......ases Referred To:- Ratanlal vs. T.A. Authority AIR 1969 MP 204. Sarat Chandra V. Bijoy Chand, AJR 1937 PC 46 atp.47. Kishore Chandra Vs. Ganesh Prasad, Am 1954 SC 316 at p 320; Jagir Kumar vs. Jaswant Singh, AIR 1963 SC 1521. Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others……….........Respondents. Judgment 11 February 2004 Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Abdul Majid Molla.......................................Petitioner Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others……….........Respondents. ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division in not sending back the Appeal to the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal for disposal afresh. The Appeal is dismissed…………(11 & 12) Lawyers Involved: Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-record- For the Appellants. Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record- For Respondent No. 1........ Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others...........................................Respondents. Judgment ......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....etary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, 40 DLR (AD) 170. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Ahsan Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- For Respondent&n......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, (Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate,...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uddin Mahmud and others Vs. Momtazuddin Ahmed and another 4 BLD (1984) AD 97; Md. Yameen and another Vs. K.A. Bashar and others 6 BLD (1986) AD 305. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex p......riminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….........Respondents. Judgment No......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.......... Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- Idris Miah vs. Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyers Involved: Saiful Reza, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Shamim ......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....inance Internal Resources Division and others................Respondents
Judgment
January 23, 2006.
Result:
The petition is dismissed.
Lawyers Involved:
Rokonuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate (Md. Momtazuddin Fakir, Advocate with him) instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Reco......Present:
Md. Ruhul Amin J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Md. Tafazzul Islam J
Messers Chemico Laboratories Ltd. represented by its Chairman of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of F......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate (Moksudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- Fo......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents Judgment 30 March 2006 Lawyers Involved: Mr. Munsurul Hoque Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner ......ision (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Appellant N. I. Bhuiyan, Advoc......(AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Lawyers Involved: Mr. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-- For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondent Civil ......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....spondent. Judgment June 22, 2002. Cases Referred To- 18 DLR (H.C) 709, 26 DLR (H.C) 10, 47 DLR (H.C) 163. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents. &nb...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....mp; others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appe......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
13211320131713141313131013071306130413011299129712961295129412931292129012891288