Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, (Faisal H. Khan, Assistant Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate,...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uddin Mahmud and others Vs. Momtazuddin Ahmed and another 4 BLD (1984) AD 97; Md. Yameen and another Vs. K.A. Bashar and others 6 BLD (1986) AD 305. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex p......riminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another…………………….........Respondents. Judgment No......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.......... Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- Idris Miah vs. Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyers Involved: Saiful Reza, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Shamim ......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....al Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate (Moksudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- Fo......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents Judgment 30 March 2006 Lawyers Involved: Mr. Munsurul Hoque Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner ......ision (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and Brothers vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation (1995) 15 BLD (HCD) 447. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Appellant N. I. Bhuiyan, Advoc......(AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Moulvi Md. Khurshid Alam vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 82. Lawyers Involved: Mr. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-- For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondent Civil ......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....spondent. Judgment June 22, 2002. Cases Referred To- 18 DLR (H.C) 709, 26 DLR (H.C) 10, 47 DLR (H.C) 163. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents. &nb...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....mp; others ……………..Respondents Judgment July 28, 1980. Result: The appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with Jamiruddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appe......late Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Messers MS Jafar...................................................... Appellant Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others ……………..Respondents Judgment ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....y;come-tax vs. Md. Asgar Mohammad Yunus & Co. P.L.D, 1968 Karachi 805; Mohabir Glass Manufacturing Co. vs. C.I.T.A.I.R, i960 Patna, 516. Lawyers Involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not re......Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ……………&h......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers Involved: T. Ali, Advocate, Instructed by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant M. H. Khand......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers...... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Amar Chandra Saha........Appellant. Vs. Ajit Kumar Das.........Respondents Judgment June 10, 1976. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Administration and Land Reforms and another……………Respondents Judgment July 29.1980. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (N. H. Khondaker, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.&...... J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others ……………………………….Appellant. Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and ......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.....Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent Judgment. July 10, 1980. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: C.R. Ali, Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Hubibul Islam Bhui......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim J Ruhul Islam J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj……………………………....................Appellant. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca..................Respondent Judgment. J......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....967) 19 DLR 106; Tanvir Ahmed Siddiky Vs. The Province of East Pakistan (1968)20 DLR (SC) 144. Lawyers Involve: Md. Moksudur Rahman, Dy. Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record —For the Appellants. Ex Parte—Respondent Nos. 1 (a)-1 (d). ......Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors. ...........Respondents. Judgment ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
S.M. Quddus & ors Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ellip;……………………………Respondents Judgment March 7,980. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mozammel Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record —For the Petitioner (in all the pet...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....134—67 I.A. 309; Sunitibala Debi vs. Dhara Sundari Debi Choudhurani (46 I.A. 272), and Kharbuja Kuer vs. Jang Bahadur A. I. R. 1963 S. C. 1203. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Haq, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. A.S.M. Mofakkher, Se...... 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....fore, forcible eviction of the possessors of such right from the premises is illegal under PO XVI of 1972. Lawyers Involved: Maksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Petitioners. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Re...... Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Public Works and Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Dacca & another………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan & others……………...Respondents. Judgment December 14, 1979.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ndan Mahton vs. Emperor, 19 Cr.LJ. 263 ; Subal Chandra Nama Das vs. Abdullah Sheikh, 30 CWN 546 ; Jogesh Chandra Sarkar vs Abdul Gani, 18 Cr.LJ. 626. Lawyers Involved: Md. Meser All, Senior Advocate instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudor Rahman, De......Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C J. Ruhul Islam, J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors ……..Appellants. Vs. State and another.......................................... Respondents Judgment Janua......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....y are concluded by the transactions past and closed………..(11) Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr Attorney-General, with Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on Record— For the Appellant in all the appeals. Shamsul Huq Chowdhury, Advocate, inst......ent: Kemaluddin Hussain CJ F. K. M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh………………………… Appellant in all the appeals Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others..................Respondents Judgment March 9, 1980. ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85