Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7301-7320 of 8149 results.
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......onal Attorney General, instructed by Mr. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 337 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 20.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2476 of 2006.) ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ......uhul Amin J.- The appeal by the plaintiff is against the judgment dated August 27, 1996 of the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 211 of 1996 allowing the same. The appeal was filed, against the order dated November 5, 1995 of the 5th Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Dhaka..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-on-Record-- For the Petitioner Not represented-For the Respondent Civil Review Petition No. 32 of 2000. (From the judgement and order dated 12th March 2000 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for leave to appeal No. 645 ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......mdash; For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N0. 671 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 22nd October, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 863 of 2000..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Order No. 69 of 1972 became inoperative on the promulgation of the Constitution of Bangladesh with effect from 16th December, 1972. The Court hearing the parties rejected this contention and by an order allowed the application whereupon the proceeding of the suit abated. The appellant moved the..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......dvocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented-The Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 79 of 1977. (From the judgment and order dated 31 5.1973 passed by the High Court Division in Income Tax Reference Case No. 7 of 1970..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ...... to vacate the premises within two weeks from the date of judgment; in default the Appellant will get vacant possession. 5. The tenant moved the Dhaka High Court in revision challenging the order of ejectment. The revision was heard by a Single Judge of the High Court. The learned Judge f..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......; Ruhul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the High Court Division dated June 27, 1979 in Writ Petition No. 294 of 1973. 2. The appellant challenged the order dated February 17, 1973 passed by the respondent No. 2, Additional Deputy Commissio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......cate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Hubibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Sajjadul Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1978 (From the judgment and order dated April 3, 1975 passed by the High Court Division in Income-tax Reference Case No. 2 of 19..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......th plaintiff's possession and management of the Debuttor properties in suit." 2. The learned Subordinate Judge found that the plaint is hit by President's Order No. 90 of 1972 and he ordered the abatement of the suit. On appeal the learned Additional District Judge was of the view..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
S.M. Quddus & ors Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... petitions). Not represented—Respondent No. 1 (in all the petitions.) Civil Petition for special leave to appeal Nos. 58 to 60 of 1980. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 6-6-79 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 993, 994 and 995 of 1978..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
.... pardanashin or not. It is, of course, a question of fact. Next, we get that the protection granted to the pardanashin ladies has been extended to ignorant and, illiterate women, though not strictly speaking pardanashin. 24. If in a case of a transfer by a pardanashin lady a dispute arises ......for our consideration, in that Sujan Bibi was a pardanashin lady, and she was also old and illiterate, and so the disposition of property made by her in favour of her grandsons, defendants 1 and 2 in order to be valid, required to be proved by the grandsons that the lady made intelligent execution o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......dvocate-on-Record, —For the Petitioners. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 339 of 1979. (From the judgment and order dated the 14th August, 1979 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 42 of 1977)..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......man, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on- Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No 19 of 1979. (From the judgment and order dated 16-2-77 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 152 of 1974). Ju..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Bangladesh Vs. Hail Abdul Gani Biswas and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ion of the High Court Division set aside and remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 233 ......1974). A. Wadud Miah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 7 in C.A. 74 of 1974. S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate—Amicus Curiae. Civil Appeal Nos. 31 to 77 of 1974. (From the judgment and order dated 26-7-74 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos, 85, 96, 100, 109, 111, 1..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Belayet Hossain and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....side and the case is remitted back to the High Court Division for disposal in accordance with law. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 231. ....................... Respondents. Judgment January 16, 1980. The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (Act XXVII of 1951) section 96 The Code of Civil Procedure, Order IX, Rule 13 The order of dismissal of an application under Order IX, rule 13 of the CPC for restoration of a proceed..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Wahid Ali and ors Vs. State, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....e the orders of the High Court and that of the Sessions Judge and direct that the proceedings are to continue in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 229 ......e upon a Petition under section 27 of the Special Powers Act in that case cannot convert himself in respect of the same proceedings to Special Tribunal under the Special Powers Act and cannot pass an order on the petition under section 27 of the Special Powers Act. Lawyers Involved: A. Hasib, A..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
M/s. Hossain Ahmed Vs. M/s. H. D Hossain & Brothers, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
.... allowed with cost and the order of the High Court Division in staying the operation of the order of the District Judge is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 223 ......ented by its proprietor Md. Delwar Hossain and others. ….. Respondents Judgment November 28, 1979. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (Act I of 1877), Sections 42, 54, 56 (d)(f) To obtain an order of injunction the plaintiff aught to assert what is his legal character and what is his right ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
Nasiruddin Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....t Division and remit the case back to it for decision in the light of the observation made above. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 216 ......urt Division were well founded in law in directing the abatement of a writ petition in view of sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 5 read with paragraph 4 of Martial Law Regulation No. VII of 1977. This order of abatement was recorded along with some other writ petitions. 2. It is to be observed tha..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 157
Sayed Ali Vs. Sree Gopal Chandra Das and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ithout any order as to costs and remit the case to the Court of first instance to dispose of the matter in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 212. ......rch 11, 1980. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act V of 1908), Section 144 The Small Causes Act, 1887 (IX of 1887), Section 33 No separate execution proceeding is required to enforce the order made under section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The power conferred to the Court of fir..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
12931292129012891288128712861284128312791278127712761275127412731272127112701269