Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Abdul Barek and Others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....ers Involved: B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ex-Parte—The Respondents. Criminal Appeal No.7 of 1993. (From the judgment and order dated 13-8-1991 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No.17 of 1990 and Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 1988 and Jail Ap...... respective bail bond and the warrant of arrest issued against respondent Nos. 4 and 5 are recalled and cancelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 28; 7 MLR (AD) 17. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Ishaque (Md) Vs. Ekramul Huque Chowdhury and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....by Md Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Ex-parte—The Respondent Nos. 1, 3-6. Civil Appeal No. 91 of 1994. (From the judgment and order dated 30-8-1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4480 of 1991). Judgment: Md. Gholam Rabbani J.- Two ......rfeiture. In view of the discussion as above the appeal fails. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:54 DLR (AD) (2002) 26. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka Vs. Ujala Match Factory, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....Record — For the Respondent (In all the cases). Civil Appeal Nos.15, 16 and 17 of 1992. (From the judgment and order dated 2 June 1991 passed by the High Court Division in Reference Application Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of 1984). Judgment: &n...... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Akbar Hossain (Md) Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Not represented—The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 378 of 1999. (From the judgment and order dated 9th June, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3179 of 1993). Judgment ...... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Government of Bangladesh and other Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... Nor represented—The Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 612 of 1996 (From the judgment and order dated 8th July, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 362 of 1987). Judgment: &nbs......e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....01. Result: The Petition is dismissed. The Limitation Act, 1908 (IX of 1908) Section 5 Condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act is a highly discretionary matter and the High Court Division exercised the discretion in favour of the Government respondent so the Appellate...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Not represented- Respondent No.6. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.450 Of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 27.01.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 6467 of 2002) Judgment: ......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Civil Appeal No. 53 of 2001 (From the Judgment and Order dated November 12, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3339 of 1992) Judgment: ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dents Judgment 27 October 2002. Lawyers Involved: Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 825 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 07-08-2000 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4063 of 2000). Judgment: &n......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 2. Not represented- Respondent Nos.3-5 Civil Appeal No.103 of 1999 (From the judgment and order dated 15.04.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.2918 of 1998) Judgment: &nb......n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; A.S.M.Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.30 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 21.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.80 of 1996.) Judgment: &nb......he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....alue fixed by the Arbitrator has not been revised on appeal by the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal or by the Superior Court on consideration of the material evidence. So, no error was committed by the High Court Division in not sending back the Appeal to the Arbitration Appellate Tribunal for disposa......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Not represented- For Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1605 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 29-04-2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 729 of 1990). Judgment: &n......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of the learned Counsel for the parties, we do not find any substance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost.......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....vocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- For the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.2154 of 2000). Judgment Mohammad Fazlu......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 2-6 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.993 Of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 12.05.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1372 of 2001.) Judgment: &......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... respondent No. 4. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 1-3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 705 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 16.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.3179 of 2005). Judgment &nbs......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 337 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 20.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2476 of 2006.) Judgment: &n......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....yan, Advocate-on-record- For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 3-12. Civil Appeal No. 114 of 1997. (From the Judgment and Order dated August 27, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.211 of 1996) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appeal ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130