Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A......ublic Prosecutor is appointed by the Government under section 492 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as part of its duty to the administration of criminal justice, as such, it is the domain of a the State to make decision as to appointment of particular Advocate as Special Public Prosecutor to co..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Shakawat Hassan Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ......gh Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Khademul Islam Chowdhury J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Shakawat Hassan.................................Petitioner Vs. State.................................................Opposite Party Judgment &nb......Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Khademul Islam Chowdhury J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Shakawat Hassan.................................Petitioner Vs. State.................................................Opposite Party Judgment ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 1
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......lowed. Ed. ......ant Inspector of the Bureau of Anti-corruption is neither illegal, nor irregular or without jurisdiction………………….(28) Cases Referred to- Md. Shamsuddin alias Lambu and others vs. State and others 40 DLR (AD) 69; Md. Shafiqullah vs State 33 DLR 297 = 1981 BLD 119; Salimuddin Ahme..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Monajjel Hossain Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......; Md. Fazlul Karim M A Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Monajjel Hossain Khan alias Mintoo.......................Petitioner vs State, Represented by the DC......................Respondent Judgment March 24t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 92
Ershad Ali Sikder (Md) Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......e are in respectful agreement with the aforesaid observation which manifests the correct exposition of law on the subject. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ershad Ali Sikder (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment......minal) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Ershad Ali Sikder (Md).....................Petitioner Vs. State ...........................................Respondent Judgment Marc..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 22 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 332
Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......passed in the light of the resolution which was taken after due compliance of the law as in section 13(3) of the Ordinance. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mosharraf Hossain (Md) (Babul) …………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh………………………&hellip......iced thereby. III. For that the object of the instant law being promotion of Local Government Institutions, pursuant to the fundamental Principles of State Policy as enshrined in Article 9 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh,..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 269
Category: Corporate Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 14 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 4
Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ...... to 10 (ten) years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 (six) months more. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 217. ......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Hussain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir .....................Petitioner Vs. State ....... Respondent Judgment March 9, 2004. Result: Maintaining the convict......pellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Hussain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Jahangir Alam (Md) alias Zakir .....................Petitioner Vs. State ....... Respondent Judgment March 9, 2004. Result: Maintaining the conviction, th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 93
Akram Hossain (Md.) Vs. Sahera Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......intiff of oral contract is false and fabricated. It is further stated that said suit-holding actually belonged to 3 sisters, namely, opposite party No.1 Sahera Khatun, and opposite party No.2 Morjina Begum and one Nazma Begum. Said three sisters, in fact, entered into a agreement with said third par......05) 317. ......nt District Judge is directed to hear and dispose of the suit within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 8 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 5
State Vs. Md. Abu Taber, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....inding on the basis of the evidence to be available with the record. The office is directed to transmit the case record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 556. ....... 2. The prosecution case has been narrated by Mohd. Ayub Ali Mollah which is as follows: The occurrence took place on 24‑5‑97 at about 1.00/1.30 PM under Raipur Police Station. Shafali Begum, since deceased, has been given in marriage about 14/15 months prior to the date of occurrence......4) 556. ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 556. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 1 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 164
State Vs. Anjuara Khatun, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....Anjuara Khatoon is sentenced to imprisonment for life. Lower Court’s Record is sent down as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 277. ......Anjuara Khatoon is sentenced to imprisonment for life. Lower Court’s Record is sent down as early as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 277. ......e Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State.............................................Petitioner Vs. Anjuara Khatun................................Condemned Prisoner Judgment ......Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 277. ..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 17 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 7
State Vs. Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ut 5 years prior to the date of occurrence. In the said marriage they were blessed with a son aged about 4 1/2 years old. On 13-2‑98 at 9‑00 PM Nasima (P.W.2), Shalema, Shefali (not examined) and Anowara (P.W.3), mother-in-law of Shalema were taking supper and on seeing that Nazrul became furiou...... a copy of his judgment for future reference. Send down the lower court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 289. ......sent: SK Sinha J MM Rahman Bhuiyan J State…………………………………………Appellant Vs. Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul……………Condemned Prisoner Judgme......2005) 289. ..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 5
Selim Saial Vs. A. Majid Molla and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... parties to bear their respective costs of the litigation. Lower Court's Record be sent down as immediate as possible. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 69. ......5; Naimuddin Sardar Vs. Md. Abdul Kalam, 41 DLR (AD) 3; Jasimuddin Kanchan Vs. Ali Ashraf, 42 DLR (AD) 289; Mazharul Borhan Vs. A.H. Bhuiyan, 15 BLD (AD) 237; Haider Unnessa and another Vs. Monwara Begum and other, 10 BLD (AD) 280; Federal Radid Commission Vs. Nelson Brothers Board; Electric and......ted in: 15 BLT (HCD) (2007) 69. ......ground of fairness but, also, upon that of the greater practical difficulty which is involved in proving a negative than in proving an affirmative………………………………….(8) The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 (Act No. XXVIII of 1951); section 95 (2) Under section ..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 6
State Vs. Moslemuddin (Md), 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......rt Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nd order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 19 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 96
State Vs. Bahar Miah, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....he offence for taking necessary steps in accordance with law as per observations made above. The connected appeals are allowed accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ......sult: The death reference is rejected. Cases Referred to- Sris Chandra Nandy Vs. Rakhalananda Thakur, AIR 1941 PC 16; State Vs. Eunus Kha, 5 BLC 353; State Vs. Mannan Gazi, 6 BLC 187; Ashnan Begum Vs. State, 51 DLR (AD) 18; Haripada Biswas Vs. State and another, 34 DLR (AD) 142; Bangladesh ......o Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ......dingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 454. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 163
Abdul Bashir alias Bashu Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....dge, Mymensingh, to take steps in accordance with law in the light of the judgment passed by the said Court on May 3 1, 1998 in Sessions Case No. 63 of 1996. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......dge, Mymensingh, to take steps in accordance with law in the light of the judgment passed by the said Court on May 3 1, 1998 in Sessions Case No. 63 of 1996. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J SJR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Abdul Bashir alias Bashu .............Petitioner Vs. State..................... Respondent Judgment January 18, 2004. Result: The pe...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J SJR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Abdul Bashir alias Bashu .............Petitioner Vs. State..................... Respondent Judgment January 18, 2004. Result: The petition ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 98
Abdus Sobhan Mandal (Md) Vs. Md. Jonab Ali Fakir & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
..... We are fully in agreement with the above findings of the high court Division. For all the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ....... We are fully in agreement with the above findings of the high court Division. For all the above reasons, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Ruhul Amin J Abdus Sobhan Mandal (Md)......Petitioner Vs. Md. Jonab Ali Fakir & others ………Respondents Judgmen......Civil Revision 3891 of 1997. 2. The facts, leading to this petition, are that the respondent No. 1 as preemptor instituted Miscellaneous Case No. 39 of 1993 under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act in the Court of the Assistant Judge, Natore. The pre- emptor's cas..Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 264
Hafizur Rahman & another Vs. State and others, 204, 33 CLC (HCD)
....7‑10‑2001 is hereby recalled. Communicate this order to the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (HCD) (2005) 588. ......7‑10‑2001 is hereby recalled. Communicate this order to the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (HCD) (2005) 588. ......Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Md. Ashfaqul Islam J Hafizur Rahman & another.....................Accused-Petitioners Vs. State and others......................................Opposite Parties Judgment J......ision (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ali Asgar Khan J Md. Ashfaqul Islam J Hafizur Rahman & another.....................Accused-Petitioners Vs. State and others......................................Opposite Parties Judgment January 17..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 3
Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & others Vs. Parvin Sultana, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....illegality in the impugned Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. Accordingly, this petition merits no consideration. Hence, it is dismissed. Ed. ......illegality in the impugned Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. Accordingly, this petition merits no consideration. Hence, it is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & others....Petitioners Vs. Parvin Sultana....Respondent Judgment January 10, 2004. ......illegality in the impugned Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. Accordingly, this petition merits no consideration. Hence, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 246
Securities and Exchange Commission, represented by its Chairman Vs. Runa N Alam, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....cordingly, set aside. The learned Additional Sessions Judge shall proceed against the accused in accordance with law. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......harging the accused order of the High Court Division to the contrary is not sustainable in law. ………………….(24, 26, 27). Cases Referred to- GL Gupta vs. DN Mehta AIR 1971 SC 2162; Begum Motia Akhtar Khanam vs. Shawrat Ara and others, 42 DLR (AD) 26, State vs. Khondker Mohammed Mo......Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: KM Hasan CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Md. Tofazzal Islam J Securities and Exchange Commission, represented by its Chairman …… Appellant Vs. Runa N Alam............Respondent Judgment January 5, 2004. Result: The appea......s not sustainable in law. ………………….(24, 26, 27). Cases Referred to- GL Gupta vs. DN Mehta AIR 1971 SC 2162; Begum Motia Akhtar Khanam vs. Shawrat Ara and others, 42 DLR (AD) 26, State vs. Khondker Mohammed Moniruzzaman, 1997 BLD (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 5 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 340