Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka Vs. Ujala Match Factory, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ......e under section 66(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Akbar Hossain (Md) Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ......1997 of the High Court Division making the Rule absolute in Civil Revision No. 3179 of 1993 setting aside those dated 12-6-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge allowing Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 3 of 1993 reviewing his earlier judgment dated 3-3-1993 in Other Class Appeal No.179 of 1..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Government of Bangladesh and other Vs. Nidhi Ram Moni and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....e High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ......e do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 14. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ......tituted Other Suit No. 193 of 1981 the Court of Subordinate Judge, Thakurgaon for declaration that order dated 5-2-1979 and ancillary order dated 6-12-1979 passed by respondent No. 1 in Miscellaneous Case No. XIII-6/1977-78 is illegal, void, without jurisdiction and is of no legal effect and not bin..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
AKM Ali Imam Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......-1-1997 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Miscellaneous Appeal No.5 of 1996 affirming judgment and order dated 13-1-1996 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka in Execution Case No.3 of 1995. 2. The short fact leading to this petition is that, the pet..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 104
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......, the petitioner cannot escape the liability of at least of the Rules, Regulations, etc. of the bank constituting misconduct warranting removal from service.……..(21, 22 and 27) Cases Referred To- Sonali Bank vs. Ruhul Amin Khan, 46 DLR (AD) 85. Agrani Bank vs. Khand..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......quired does no confer any right to the owner of the land to claim that property as no vested right or any legal right has accrued in favour of the previous owner…….(35) Cases Referred to- Marida Begum and others Vs. Moulavi Md. Hasan and others, 43 DLR, 242; ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Yousuf Ali Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n cannot be sustained and so the appeal should be allowed. 22. The appeal is, therefore, allowed. In the facts and circumstances we direct the parties to bear their own costs. Ed. ...... Md. Yousuf Ali ..........................................Appellant. Vs. Kazi Syed Shamsul Hoque and others...........Respondents. Judgment 30 January 2006. Cases Referred To:- Ratanlal vs. T.A. Authority AIR 1969 MP 204. Sarat Chandra V. Bij..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 178
Abdul Majid Molla Vs. Biswajit Chandra (minor) & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he learned Advocate for the petitioner could not point out any legal infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. 9. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed ...... Short facts are that the plaintiff instituted the suit for declaration of title, confirmation of possession and for further declaration that the lease granted in favour of defendant No.1 in lease Case No.XII-E-129/1969-70 is illegal, void and without jurisdiction on the assertions, inter alia, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed.......by setting aside the award dated September 18, 1994 of the Arbitrator (appointed under section 27 of the Acquisition and Requisition of the Immovable Property Ordinance, 1982) in Arbitration Revision Case No. 1636 of 1990 and sending the Arbitration Revision case to the Court of the Arbitrator to di..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......desh and others................................Petitioners Vs Md. Shahjahan Gazi..................................................Respondent Judgment 27 July 2002 Cases Referred To- Sk. All Ahmed vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Ban..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......t of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgment 22 March 2005 Cases Referred To- Zane Alam Khan vs. Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, 3 BLC (AD) 55; A.B.M. Abdul Ba..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... the company but depositing the same to their own account do not constitute an offence of Cheating and Criminal breach of trust. The proceeding is accordingly quashed……..(9, 10 & 11) Cases Referred to- Nasiruddin Mahmud and others Vs. Momtazuddin Ahmed and another 4 BLD (19..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- Idris Miah vs. Bangladesh and others 10 BLC (2005) HCD 728. Lawyer..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ................Appellant. Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., represented by its Managing Director and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Cases Referred to- Union of India and another vs. Ladulal Jain AIR 1963 SC, 1681. M/s. Anwar and..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgment 5 May 2002. Cases Referred To- Kazi Md. Aminul Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD) 110; Mo..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106