Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed....... 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated May 28, 1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 364 of 1996) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appeal by leave is against the judgment dated May 28, 1998 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.364 of 1996 making the R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Ullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners Not represented- For Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1605 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 29-04-2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 72..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... the Appellants T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Khaled Ahmed, Advocate-on Record- For the Respondent Civil Appeal No.283 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 301 November 2000 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Appea..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ansur Habib, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- For the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2000 (From the judgment and order dated 8th March 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-For Respondent Nos. 2-6 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.993 Of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 12.05.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1372 of ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No. 4. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 1-3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 705 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 16.05.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.3179 of 2..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Kamal, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Mr. A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 337 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 20.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2476 of ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ...... (From the Judgment and Order dated August 27, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.211 of 1996) Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- The appeal by the plaintiff is against the judgment dated August 27, 1996 of the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 211 of 1996 allowing t..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......199) Judgment: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J.-This is an application for review of the judgment and order dated 12-03-2000 dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal. 2. Th..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......te-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Not represented- For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal N0. 671 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated 22nd October, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Messres MS Jafar Vs. Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca & others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......point of view we do not find any substance in this point. This appeal and the petition for special leave are dismissed but we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented-The Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 79 of 1977. (From the judgment and order dated 31 5.1973 passed by the High Court Division in Income Tax Reference Case N..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Amar Chandra Saha Vs. Ajit Kumar Das, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... mere fact of payment of rent by the Tenant. We, therefore, find no reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Ed. ......lant and his uncle Lakshmi Narayan. The Small Cause Courts Judge, after hearing the parties, decreed the suit and directed the tenant to vacate the premises within two weeks from the date of judgment; in default the Appellant will get vacant possession. 5. The tenant moved the Dhaka..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Udaypur Halima Darul Ulum Madrasha and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ust succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division is set aside. Let the Government proceed in accordance with law. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......Appeal No. 156 of 1979. Judgment: Ruhul Islam J.- This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the High Court Division dated June 27, 1979 in Writ Petition No. 294 of 1973. 2...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Jamal Soap Factory, Narayanganj Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ates to the income for the period 1365 B.S. suffers from want of jurisdiction. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the question is answered in the negative. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Hubibul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by Sajjadul Haq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1978 (From the judgment and order dated April 3, 1975 passed by the High Court Division in Income-tax Reference Cas..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Sri Sri Madan Gopal Jew Bigraha and ors., 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the first appellate Court is empowered to question validity of Hate Court and restore that of the trial Court recording abatement of the suit, There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
S.M. Quddus & ors Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......2 (in all the petitions). Not represented—Respondent No. 1 (in all the petitions.) Civil Petition for special leave to appeal Nos. 58 to 60 of 1980. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 6-6-79 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 993, 994 an..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......f their Lordships, completely explain the law applicable to the pardanashin lady so far as the present question is concerned. Those cases are 41 I.A. 23 and 52 I.A. 342 where there is an illuminating judgment delivered by Lord Summer in which he dealt with a case where an illiterate pardanashin lady..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Petitioners. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 339 of 1979. (From the judgment and order dated the 14th August, 1979 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67