Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7401-7420 of 8005 results.
....t Directorate, Ministry of Defence, Dhaka Cantonment and others……………………..Respondents
Judgment
March 5, 1992.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (M Nurullah, Senior Advocate and Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab......
Appellate Division
(Civil)
Present:
MH Rahman J
ATM Afzal J
Mustafa Kamal J
Latifur Rahman J
National Engineers Ltd...............Appellant
Vs.
Director, Military Lands and Cantonment Directorate, Ministry of Defence, Dhaka Can......eal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Four months' time from date is granted to remove the structures, machineries, etc. from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......eal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Four months' time from date is granted to remove the structures, machineries, etc. from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....allenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Kazi Shahabuddi......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The a...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ers..................................................Respondents Judgment November 3, 1991 Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑Respondent...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....h, 1991. Cases Referred To: Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ̴......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....1992. Case Referred to- Pratap Singh vs. Krishna Gupta AIR 1966 SC 140. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate –on ‑Record -For the Appellants. Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Ad......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limited by shares........................Respondent ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... January 28th, 1992. Case Referred to- Abdullah & 3 others Vs. Abdul Karim & others 20 DLR (SC) 205. Lawyers Involved: SR Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellants...... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others................. Plaintiff‑Respondents ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....; Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1990 Lawyers Involved: Mia A Gafur, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Sh......mal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents Judgment January 20, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellants. Dr......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chanjury Talukder and another .................................Appellants. Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Madar Chandra Basu Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...........Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monsur Ali, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑......ddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17t......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....a; In AIR 1978 Cal. 559 (564) Bali Ram Vs. Bhupendra Nath & In Habibullah Vs. Ananga Mohan AIR (29) 1942 Calcutta 571. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocat...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Moudud Ahmed, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑onRecord ‑For the Petitio......ent here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers In......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88
Rupban Bibi Vs. Aynal Kha and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
..........Plaintiff‑Appellant Vs. Aynal Kha and others................Defendant‑Respondents Judgment July 16th, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hamid, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant.......n (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Karnal J Latifur Rahman J Rupban Bibi..... ....................Plaintiff‑Appellant Vs. Aynal Kha and others................Defendant‑Respondents Judgment Ju......ct in the case, we set aside the impugned judgment and grant temporary injunction till disposal of the suit. Consequently, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......ct in the case, we set aside the impugned judgment and grant temporary injunction till disposal of the suit. Consequently, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Mackinnon Mackenzie & C. (Pak.) Ltd Vs. Com. of Taxes Ctg (South) Zone, Chtg, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Referred to- Commissioner of Income‑Tax, Kerala Vs Malayalam Plantations Ltd. [1964] 53 ITR (SC) 140 (150). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate -on‑Record‑ For the Appellant....... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company (Pakistan) Ltd.. ..................………………Appellant Vs. Commissioner of Taxes Chittagong (South) Zone, Chittagong ................Responde...... incurred for carrying on the business in this country. The High Court Division's answer to the question referred to is upheld. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... incurred for carrying on the business in this country. The High Court Division's answer to the question referred to is upheld. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
SA Sultan Vs. The State and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
........Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State and another................Respondents Judgment November 20, 1991. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Rokonuddin Mahmood, Advocate, instructed by Shamsul Huq Siddique, Advocate‑on‑Record- For the Appellant. M Sham......39. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs. Banque Indosuez, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... March 8th, 1992 Case Referred to- Lahore Improvement Trust Vs. Khuda Bakksh Meraj Din PLD 1956 Lah. 252. Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Appell......d.......................................Defendant‑Appellant Vs. Banque Indosuez having Its Local Office at 47, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka .............of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mujibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....nton Vs. Hampton, (1858) 117 RR 32 at p.41: 11 Moo PC 347 & Attorney‑General for Ontario Vs. Attorney General for Canada, 1921 AC 571 (583). Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑onRecord‑For the Appellant (In Civil Appea...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mujibur Rahman (Md)……………………………………. Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……….. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987) ...... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ......2 All ER 45; Liyanage Vs. The Queen (1966] 1 All ER 650; Societe United Docks and others Vs. Government of Mauritius [1985]1 All ER 864; Hinds and others Vs. The Queen (1976) 1 All ER 353; SP Sampath Kumar Vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 386; Minerva Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India AIR 1980 SC, 1789; B..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 203
Dr. Ahmed Hussain Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....p; Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992 Lawyers Involved: Dr. Ahmed Hussain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Petitioner. ...... Latifur Rahman J Dr. Ahmed Hussain ..................Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh and others…...........Respondents Judgment March 2, 1992...... shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We find no merit in this petition and, accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... shall prevent the State, which expression includes Parliament, from making special provision in favour of women. We find no merit in this petition and, accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 191
Jamuna Oil Company Limited and another Vs.SK Dey and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ants Vs. SK Dey and another.............................................Respondents Judgment August 25, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Rafiq‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate (AKM Nazrul Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Mr. Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate&#...... (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Jamuna Oil Company Limited and another................Appellants Vs. SK Dey and another.............................................Respondents Judgmen......d judgment of the High Court Division as well as the decree passed by the two Courts below. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the suit of respondent No. 1 is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......d judgment of the High Court Division as well as the decree passed by the two Courts below. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the suit of respondent No. 1 is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Abdus Sattar Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others , 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....lant Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others .............Defendant‑Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Lawyers Involved: MH Khondakar, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (AJ Mohammad Ali, Advocate and MA Matin Advocate Supreme Court with him) in......sent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Sattar ......................Plaintiff‑Appellant Vs. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman and others .............Defendant‑Respondent Ju......ating to the finding of adverse possession made by the High Court Division, the appeal cannot succeed in any case. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......ating to the finding of adverse possession made by the High Court Division, the appeal cannot succeed in any case. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Chand Mia and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ts Judgment August 7, 1991. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney ‑General, (B Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑ General, with him), instructed by Md. Ayub, Advocate on Record ‑ For the Appellant. Mahfuzur Rahman, Advocate, Supreme Court, inst......;…………………………………………………………Appellant Vs. Chand Mia and others ..............................................................Respond......f‑appellant. Hence the order portion of the lower appellate Court needs modification. The appeal is, therefore, allowed but with no cost. The plaintiffs suit is decreed. Ed. ......f‑appellant. Hence the order portion of the lower appellate Court needs modification. The appeal is, therefore, allowed but with no cost. The plaintiffs suit is decreed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
101510141013101210111010100910081007100610051004100310011000999998997996995