Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7401-7420 of 8015 results.
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November 21 st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on-Record-For the Appellant. Khanda......Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment ......ing to SA khatian No. 2994 of JL No. 50 belonging to mouza Bawa Alokanda (of which the suit premises in the other suit is a part) belonged to Rajendra Lal Karmaker who died leaving 3 sons, namely, Dilip Kumar, Hirendra Nath Karmaker and Dhirendra Nath Karmaker. The aforesaid land comprising 0'08...... SA khatian No. 2994 of JL No. 50 belonging to mouza Bawa Alokanda (of which the suit premises in the other suit is a part) belonged to Rajendra Lal Karmaker who died leaving 3 sons, namely, Dilip Kumar, Hirendra Nath Karmaker and Dhirendra Nath Karmaker. The aforesaid land comprising 0'080 acre..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For th......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......er of the Union Parishad PW 8 Amiruzzarnan and many others rushed to the plaice of occurrence immediately on hearing gunshots. Safiuddin was administered first aid by two local doctors, Dr. Ranjit Kumar Majumder and Dr. Delwar but Safiuddin succumbed to the injuries at about 11‑30 AM. The ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Mollah and another…………………... Accused-Respondents Judgment March 25th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Lutfur Rahman Mazumdar, Advocate, Supreme Court with him) instructed by M......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
..............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 1991 Lawyers Involved: Moinul Huq, Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record - For the Petitioner. Abdul Hu......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement May 3rd, 1992. Lawyers Involved: A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate‑on- Record-For the Appellant Ex - parte - For the Respondents. C...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....desh Chemical Industries Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) ...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate ……………………………&he......; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Ishaque Khan (Md) and another Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....retary, Principal Office, Kawran Bazar, Dhaka………………Respondent Judgment October 31st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab‑I, Advocate‑on‑Record, Supreme Court‑‑For the Appellants. Quazi A T Mon......) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Ishaque Khan (Md) and another…………..Appellants Vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Principal Office, Kawra......rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ......rospective effect, but it will be effective from the date it was passed, namely 4.5.1987. Subject to this observation, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Law and Justice Division and another ………………… Respondents Judgment May 14th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Abu Taher Chowdhury, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Ataul Huq, Advocate‑on‑ Record ‑For the Ap...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and anoth...... unaffected for some time. 3. But a few days thereafter, i.e. on 21st October, 1988 at about 9‑00 PM, Chairman of Ward No. 37 of the Municipal Corporation‑Mr. Awlad Hossain alias Dilip‑suddenly appeared on the scene, Zaker Super Market, being armed with a pistol and accom......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....cused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek Senior Advocate, (Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Shamsul Huq Siddique, Advocate̴...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
....t Directorate, Ministry of Defence, Dhaka Cantonment and others……………………..Respondents
Judgment
March 5, 1992.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (M Nurullah, Senior Advocate and Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab......
Appellate Division
(Civil)
Present:
MH Rahman J
ATM Afzal J
Mustafa Kamal J
Latifur Rahman J
National Engineers Ltd...............Appellant
Vs.
Director, Military Lands and Cantonment Directorate, Ministry of Defence, Dhaka Can......eal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Four months' time from date is granted to remove the structures, machineries, etc. from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......eal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Four months' time from date is granted to remove the structures, machineries, etc. from the disputed land.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....allenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Kazi Shahabuddi......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The a...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ers..................................................Respondents Judgment November 3, 1991 Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑Respondent...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....h, 1991. Cases Referred To: Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ̴......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....1992. Case Referred to- Pratap Singh vs. Krishna Gupta AIR 1966 SC 140. Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate –on ‑Record -For the Appellants. Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Ad......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limited by shares........................Respondent ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Joynal Abedin and others Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... January 28th, 1992. Case Referred to- Abdullah & 3 others Vs. Abdul Karim & others 20 DLR (SC) 205. Lawyers Involved: SR Pal, Senior Advocate, instructed by Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellants...... ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Joynal Abedin and others…………….. Defendant‑Appellants Vs. Mafizur Rahman & others................. Plaintiff‑Respondents ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ......, the judgment of the learned Single Judge suffers from legal infirmity and the same is liable to be set aside. In the result, the appeal is allowed without cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Musa Ali Vs. Nur Ahmed and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....; Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1990 Lawyers Involved: Mia A Gafur, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Appellant. Shafique Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Sh......mal J Latifur Rahman J Musa Ali ..................Appellant Vs. Nur Ahmed and others...................Respondents Judgment November 25, 1......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ned Advocate for the respondents and have gone through them in this case. Order of the Court. By majority decision the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents Judgment January 20, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellants. Dr......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chanjury Talukder and another .................................Appellants. Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Madar Chandra Basu Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
...........Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Md. Monsur Ali, Advocate, (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate‑on‑......ddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17t......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....a; In AIR 1978 Cal. 559 (564) Bali Ram Vs. Bhupendra Nath & In Habibullah Vs. Ananga Mohan AIR (29) 1942 Calcutta 571. Lawyers Involved: Kh. Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocat...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
10261025102410231022102110201018101710161015101410131012101110101009100810071006