Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bangladesh Bank and others Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ......n Tourism Development Corporation, AIR 1987 (SC) I 11; Central Inland Transport Corporation Vs. Brojanath, AIR 1986 (SC) 1571 and MK Agarwal Vs. Gurgaon Gramin Bank, AIR 1988 (SC) 286. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (MA Wahab Miah, Advocate w......gned decision has been taken by Board of Directors instead of Central Board of Directors. It may be mentioned here that after the emergence of Bangladesh as an Independent State the Bangladesh Bank Order……Presidents Order No. 127 of 1972......was made to establish a Central Bank in ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Sharif Nurul Ambia Vs. Dhaka City Corporation represented by its Mayor and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......erred to- V Lakshmipathy vs. State of Karnataka reported in AIR 1992 Karnataka 57; RV Paddingtom Valuation Officer Ex P Peachey Corporation Limited vs. State (1966) 1 QB 380 (400). Lawyers Involved: Salauddin Mahmud, Advocate instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 293
Sheikh Farid (Md) & others Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......land by adverse possession……….((9, 10 & 11) Case Referred To: Mir Laik Ali vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287. Lawyers Involved: SM Munir, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record&mdash......Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 11, 17, 24 and 39. Not represented—Respondent Nos. 3-10, 12-16. 18-23, 25-38 & 40-44. Civil Appeal No. 451 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 23, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1835 of 1994). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Selim (Md) and others Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......tion Act……….( 5 & 7) Cases Referred To: Syed Amir Hossain vs. Nadera Rahman, 37 DLR (AD) 184; Sakina Khatoon vs. Ibrahim Ahmed Khan, 2 MLR (AD) 330. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Serajul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the plaintiff has been proved by oral evidence and otherwise, the suit is not barred by limitation for bringing the suit beyond six years from the publication of the S. A. record...(8) Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-o......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ection 233 of the Company law and thus in passing the impugned judgment and order. Therefore, we do not find merits in this leave petition. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ve Petition and it is dismissed………(12) Case Referred to- Syed Al Nesar Ahmed MD, United Food Complex Ltd. vs. Nafisa Choudhury and others 53 DLR (AD) 83. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, ......ection 233 of the Company law and thus in passing the impugned judgment and order. Therefore, we do not find merits in this leave petition. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Anwar Hossain Vs. Mainul Hosein & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the Printing Presses and Publications (Declaration and Registration) Act 1973 as Printer and Publisher of the daily Ittefaq for the Company. Mr. Anwar Hossain continued as the Minister under the Martial Law Government of HM. Ershad upto 6-12-1990 and Mr. Akhtarul Alam continued as the editor ......ector of Customs and others 1991 BLD (AD) 327; Osman Gazi Mondal vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and others, 27 DLR (AD) 61; Mujibor Rahman (Md) vs. Government of Bangladesh and others 44 DLR (AD) 111. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate, Rakonuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate (MK Rahm......ers reported in 31 DLR (AD) 234. In that case the question arose whether an employee of New Dhaka Industries Ltd incorporated under the Companies Act and subsequently nationalised under President's Order 27 of 1972, could challenge the order of dismissal passed by the management of the said comp..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Akhtar Begum & others Vs. Mahmudul Haque, Advocate and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....above-established principles of law on the subject, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......s. Mt Chembeli and others, AIR 1951 Cal 262, Mela and another vs. Labhu and another, AIR 1955 Punjab 97; AIR 1920 Patna 82, AIR 1924 Lahore 608, AIR 1943 Madras 645, AIR 1956 Hyderabad 133. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary Advoca......que, Advocate and others... .............Respondents Judgment February 5, 2005. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I of 1877), Section 42 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII, rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, if the defects mentioned in the petition are app..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Rana Awan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... 725; AIR 1935 (Lahore) 914; AIR 1916 (Cal) 570; EM Visvandhan Chetty and two others vs. Arunachelam Chetti, ILR 44 Mad. 100; Khazan Chand vs. Moti Singh and another, AIR 1935 (Lahore) 914. Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Rec......ed to meet the expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund. Clause (3) of Article 90 does not mean that in view of clause (e) of Article 88, the executing Court on the basis of rules 52 and 55 of Order XXI, the Code of Civil Procedure read with Articles 71 and 72 of Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......to- Biswaswar Roy vs. Joytennessa and others,13 DLR 287; Shafi Khan vs. Mannujan Hussain and others, 35 DLR (AD) 225; Muzaffar Ali Bepari vs. Omar All and others, 1 BLC (AD) 25. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nandi, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-o......vocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Not represented—Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 267 of 2002. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 23, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4097of1996) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......urchase. Prayer for pre-emption is not maintainable……………(13) Case Referred to- Md Abbas Ali vs Md Osman Ali (Minor) and others 37 DLR 324. Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. ......, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Md Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 587 of 2001. (From the Judgment and Order dated May 26, 1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 343 of 1995). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ...... to appeal before the Appellate Division is an unnecessary exercise which has caused the petitioner long three years. This is highly deprecated. …………….(12) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record&mda......pellants. NI Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 14. Not represented—Respondent No. 5. Civil Appeal No. 301 of 2002. (From the Judgment and Order dated July 31, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 356 of 1990). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Monowara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... without complying with the provisions of law. The case is set back for trial rightly in accordance with law……………………(10, 11 & 12) Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advo......absolute. 2. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, in short, BSRS filed Miscellaneous Case No. 143 of 1992 against respondent No. 1 and another under Article 33 of Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha Order, 1972 (President's Order No. 128 of 1972) hereinafter referred to as the Order for realisatio..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Jainul Abedin Jamal Vs. Qais Huda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... validly and legally transferred the premises, the petitioner’s right to remain tenant under the new purchaser remains unaffected. Both the leave petitions are dismissed……..(9 & 10) Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record for the petitioners (In both t......itioner Vs. Qais Huda and others....................Respondents Judgment December 15, 2005. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Management, Control and Disposal) Order, 1972 (P.O. No. 16 of 1972), Article 10 Tenancy right of the petitioner after death of ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdur Rahim (Md) Vs. Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. & anr, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itioner. 14. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the Judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. In view of the above, the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed.......d occupant under a monthly tenant. He has obviously no right and title in the suit property. Consequently, he is not a necessary party to the suit for eviction of the monthly tenant. ………(10) Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate......ur Rahim (Md)..............Petitioner Vs. Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. & anr................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2003. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order I rule 10 The High Court Division found the petitioner as an unauthorised occupant under a ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... = 35 DLR 79; Akhtarun Nessa and another vs. Habibullah and others 31 DLR (AD) 88; Abdus Samad vs. Md Sohrab All 33 DLR (AD) 113; Motilal Sikder vs. Benodini Dasi 28 DLR (AD) 5; 14 DLR 847. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-R......hrab Ali and others reported in 1981 BLD (AD) 77, it was held that on account of omission of necessary party a preemption case shall not be dismissed outright keeping in view the provision of Order 1, rule 9, CPC, inasmuch as non-joinder of a necessary party will not by itself defeat a suit..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......LR (AD) 15; Aziza Khatun vs. State 19 DLR 354; LD Jaikwal vs. State of UP AIR 1984 (SC) 1374; Abdul Karim Sarker vs. State, 38 DLR (AD) 188; Asharam M Jain vs. AT Gupta, AIR 1983(SC) 1151. Lawyers involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mainul Hosein, Senior Advo......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Agrani Bank. Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......in the Writ Jurisdiction as there could be conflicting decisions. Moreover the order passed by the High Court Division being not a speaking order, it cannot be sustained…..(8) Lawyers Involved: MG Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ansarul...... The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section XXXVII, rule 2 During pendency of Summary Suit No. 6 of 1996 in the Court of the District Judge, Dhaka under the provisions of Order XXXVII rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure respondent no. 1 brought the Writ Petition on th..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......ore circumspection undertaken on the part of the learned Counsel as a senior member of the Bar and the Court sound word of caution to him for the future………..(28) Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by SR Khoshnabi......Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......lvi Mainuddin 39 DLR (AD) 1; Mian Muhammad Latif vs. Province of West Pakistan, PLD 1970 SC 180; Al-Haj Abul Basher being dead his heirs Hosne Ara Begum vs. Bangladesh 50 DLR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51