Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7501-7520 of 8015 results.
Bangladesh Vs. M/s. Sree Kundeswari Aushadhalaya, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....kar, Attorney-General with M/S Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-General A.Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General and B. B. Roy Choudhury, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. H. Khondkar, Advocate, instructed by Mr. B.C. Panday A......Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Bangladesh……………………......................... Appellant (In all the cases). Vs. M/s. Sree Kundeswari Aushadhalaya………...Respondent (In Appeal No. 13 of 1975) M/s. S......uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......uestion any further. For the reasons, we find no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed, but having regard to the facts and circumstances of the matter, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 137
Abul Hayat Choudhury Vs. Nurul Amin and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; December 8, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdhury, instructed by A. Rab-II Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. ......ddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Abul Hayat Choudhury ......................................Appellant Vs. Nurul Amin and ors...........................................Respondents Judgment......pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ......pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 141
Mohiuddin Khan and others Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....rs......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January 4, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rab-1, Advocate on Record—For the appellants. Kazi Shafiuddin, Advocate instructed by A. Rob-...... (Civil) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Hussain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mohiuddin Khan and others......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... Judgment Feb. 11, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hossain Khan, Deputy Attorney-General with B. B. Roy Choudhury, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by S. S, Hoda Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate—For the Respon......yed A. B. Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsan-uddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Bangladesh.....................................................Appellant. Vs. Abdul Khaleque and ors.................................. Respondents. (In C. A.......he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ......he matter in the manner indicated above. The appeal No. 26 of 1976 subject to the observation made above is dismissed. We however make no order as to costs in all the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Akhtar Hossain Khan & others Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....S. Bareilly Municipality, AIR 1974 SC 396; referred A. Malek vs. Abdur Rahman, (1976) 19 DLR3I8; Sona vs. State, (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 55. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Advocate with Abul n, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, ate-on-Record (Absent) Rafique-ul-Huq, ......C J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Mumin J Akhtar Hossain Khan & others .................Appellants. Vs. The State..............................................Respondent Judgment ......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113
M/s Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
..../s Speed Bird Navigation Company and another vs. Bangladesh in (1975) 27 D.L.R. 170; Md. Rejaul Haque vs. Bangladesh m (1976) 28 D.L.R. 38. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandker, Senior Advocate, with Syed Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For the......………Appellant (In Appeal No. 6 of 1972). M/s Carpet Allied Products Ltd………………. Appellant (In Appeal No. 7 of 1972). Vs. Bangladesh and another.................... Respondents in all the appeals Judgmen......e of the enactment of the Basic Democracies Order. We, therefore, do not find any substance in all these appeals which are dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......e of the enactment of the Basic Democracies Order. We, therefore, do not find any substance in all these appeals which are dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 244
Serajuddin Bepari & ors Vs. Mizanur Rahman & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
..... No 3/77. Bangladesh and ors. .............. Respondents (In C. P. No. 4/77) Judgment January 7, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Abdul Malek, Advocate, instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Pe...... Fazle Munim J Serajuddin Bepari & ors……………………………………….Petitioners. Vs. Mizanur Rahman & ors...............Respondents, (in C.P. No 3/77. Bangladesh...... must claim, inter alia, a legal right, and allege an injury which is not ordinarily reparable by monetary compensation; with these observations, these petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... must claim, inter alia, a legal right, and allege an injury which is not ordinarily reparable by monetary compensation; with these observations, these petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dacca Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....le Bank Ltd. Vs. Mohammad Shamsuddin 21 DLR (SC) 368; Secretary EPIDC Vs. Serajul Haq 22 DLR (SC) 284. Lawyers Involved: Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-General, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. H. Khondker, Senior Advocate, instructed by Abdur Rab......sent: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dacca..............Appellant Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury.........................................Respondent Result: T......e the scope of the leave order and so we abstain from entering into it. In the result this appeal is dismissed with no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 41. ......tion Vs. Sukhdeo, AIR 1971 SC 1828; Dr. S. Datt vs. University of Delhi, AIR 1958 SC 1050, S. R. Tewari vs. District Board, Agra, AIR, 1964 S. C, 1680, Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Sunil Kumar Mukherjee, AIR 1964 SC 849; Rathaur vs. Divisional Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 170
Managing Director, Janata Bank Vs. Hafijuddin Ahmed and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....k .................Appellant Vs. Hafijuddin Ahmed and others .....................Respondents Judgement May 7, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Advocate, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. T. H. Kh......ud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Managing Director, Janata Bank .................Appellant Vs. Hafijuddin Ahmed and others .....................Respondents Judgement ......sons set out in Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1975 and they need not be repeated here. With the modification set out above the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......sons set out in Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1975 and they need not be repeated here. With the modification set out above the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 70
A.K.M. Muklesur Rahman Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....; December 7, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hussain Khan, Deputy Attorney General instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record —For the Petitioner. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate (on permission) &m......Syed A.B Mahmud Husain C J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J A.K.M. Muklesur Rahman........................Respondent Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh...............................Petitioner Judgment &...... forthwith. We cannot, therefore, agree that the reasons shown by the petition for condonation of delay are at all satisfactory. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ...... forthwith. We cannot, therefore, agree that the reasons shown by the petition for condonation of delay are at all satisfactory. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... with M/S. Ronadhir Sen, Deputy Attorney-General, Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Assistant Attorney-General, Md. Ismailuddin Sarker, Assistant Attorney-General (appeared on 21-8-75) instructed by A.W. Mian. Advocate-on -Record. — For the appellant. B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Res....... Mahmud Hussain C J Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Bangladesh..........................................Appellant. Vs. Abdul Mannan and others....................... Respondents Judgment Jan. ......rder as to costs the decision of the High Court is set aside and the case is sent back to the High Court Division for treating the matter as an appeal and dispose it of accordingly. Ed. ......rder as to costs the decision of the High Court is set aside and the case is sent back to the High Court Division for treating the matter as an appeal and dispose it of accordingly. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 135
Abul Layes Vs. Mst. Anwara Khatun & legal representatives: Abu Sayed Ahmed & ors, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.............. Appellant Vs. Mst. Anwara Khatun & legal representatives: Abu Sayed Ahmed and others. ………..Respondents Judgment August 18, 1976 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Md. Yeasin, Advocate, i...... Ed. ......ises. In the result, the appeal is allowed with costs althrough. The judgement of the High Court is hereby set-aside and those of the Trial Court and the first appellate Court are restored. Ed. ...... predecessor-in-interest of the respondents for ejectment stating, inter alia, that the holding No. 43, Panch Bhai Ghat Lane within Police Station Sutrapur, Dacca originally belonged to one Upendra Kumar Roy and his co-sharers from whom the appellant acquired 16 annas interest on the basis of two ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Hafez Abul Khair and another Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... DLR 374 ; Akam Sheikh Vs. Emperor. AIR 1947 Cal. 35; Kalaporla vs. Hyderabad Court, AIR 1953 Hyd. 249; Begu & ors. Vs. King Emperor, AIR 1925 130. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Advocate with Rabeya Bhuiyan, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on- Record—For the ......anuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Hafez Abul Khair and another................................. Appellants Vs. The State………………………&hell...... 302/109 Penal Code. The accused shall continue in custody even after expiry of the sentence passed on them on the charge of collaboration. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. Ed. ...... 302/109 Penal Code. The accused shall continue in custody even after expiry of the sentence passed on them on the charge of collaboration. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Ansar (Md) Chan Mia Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....aja Mia. This part of the case has been established by the evidence of competent and reliablle witnesses. 14. The High Court Division has rejected the submission of the learned Advocate representing the condemned prisoner for imposing sentence of life imprisonment instead of ......bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim .J Ansar (Md) Chan Mia.........................................Petitioner Vs. State....................................................Respondent &n......ife, on maintaining the conviction the convict under section 302 of the Penal Code. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 115. ......ife, on maintaining the conviction the convict under section 302 of the Penal Code. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 115. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Nibir Chandra Chowdhury and others Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....unting to murder under part II of section 304 of the Penal Code. ……………………( 9 & 10) Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record—Fo......bsp; Nibir Chandra Chowdhury and others..................... Appellants Vs. State......................Respondent Judgment ...... a sentence of Taka 500 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) month each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 113. ...... a sentence of Taka 500 in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) month each. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 113. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Member, Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....Appellate Tribunal, writ petition before the High Court Division is not maintainable……………(6) Lawyers Involved: B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate (Seraj......p; Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Dhaka...... ............Petitioner Vs. Member, Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka and others...............................hat view of the matter, we no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 112. ......hat view of the matter, we no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 112. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Habibur Rahman Howlader Vs. State and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... Since a legal notice was served within fifteen days of information of return of the cheques, there was no valid ground for quashing the proceeding. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammed Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner Mohammad Ali, Advo......llate Division (Criminal) Present: Latifur Rahman CJ Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Habibur Rahman Howlader...................Petitioner Vs. State and another..................... Respondents Judgment November 7, 2000. ......ammed Ali, learned Advocate, could not point out any illegality in the impugned judgment. The petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 111. ......ammed Ali, learned Advocate, could not point out any illegality in the impugned judgment. The petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 111. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Abdus Sobhan Vs. Anwar Rahim & others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....not calling for the record of the earlier Title Suit No. 21 of 1968 over which the present suit has been filed……..(4) Lawyers Involved: Abul Quasem, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Responde...... Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Abdus Sobhan........................Petitioner Vs. Anwar Rahim & others......................... Respondents &nbs......for our interference. There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 110. ......for our interference. There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 110. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Ziauddin Ahmed and others Vs. Arab Bangladesh Bank and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... the bank where the money is deposited on the basis of the contract the Bank cannot be injuncted……..(7) Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. ...... Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Golam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Ziauddin Ahmed and others..............Appellants Vs. Arab Bangladesh Bank and others.............Respondents &nbs......nction in the present case. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 107. ......nction in the present case. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 107. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Syed Abdur Rahim Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works, Government of Bangladesh & ors, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... allottees of the plots had not been impleaded in the two Rules and so those are bad for defect of parties…………(3) Lawyers Involved: Dr. M Zahir Senior Advocate (MA Rahim, Advocate with him), instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Record&md...... Present: Latifur Rahman CJ Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Syed Abdur Rahim.............................................. Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works, Government of Bangladesh and others...........Respondent......llegality in the judgment and orders passed by the High Court Division. The petitions are therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 106. ......llegality in the judgment and orders passed by the High Court Division. The petitions are therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (AD) (2001) 106. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 138
916915914913912911910909908907906905904903902901900899898896