Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 741-760 of 1025 results.

Abdus Samad Sheikh and another Vs. Khaleda Begum and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....onal application. We find no substance in this leave petition which is accordingly dismissed with the above observation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) (2006) 24. ...... said Bai Muazzal and Bai Murrabaha investment facility from the Bank but because of financial loss, allegedly suffered by the plaintiff-industry, because of non sanc­tion of further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94

M/S. R.M. Salt Crushing Industries Vs. Sonali Bank, Cox's Bazar Branch & others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....urisdiction. There is no illegality in the impugned judgment and order. Accordingly, the leave petition is dis­missed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 1012. ......tinuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit has been filed by the respondent No.1, Sonali Bank, for realization of its outstanding loan amount of Tk.1,24,93,829.19/- being principle loan amount plus the accrued interest amount th..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 136

Fazle Elahi Sharfuzzaman Vs. Surujit Bose (Raju) and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....the above, we find in sub­stance on the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 1009.......quiry RAJUK approved the plan on 13.12.2006 for 16 storied commercial building. Subsequently, the respondent No.7 exe­cuted a contract with a developer named Pioneer Builders Limited who has taken a loan of TK. 15 crore from the Bank. 4. Mr. Md. Nurul Amin, learned Advocate, appearing for the pe..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 214

M/s International Trade Promotors Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

....there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 306. ....... 2. Facts, in brief, are that Agrani Bank, the respondent No. 2 filed Title Suit No.227 of 1991 in the Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka, the respondent No.1, for realization of the outstanding loan of Tk. 17,86,393.38 from the petitioners and the suit was decreed ex parte on 28.5.1992; the r..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 191

M/S. United Leather International Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

.... interference. We do not find any merit in this leave petition. Accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 978. ......se No.86 of 2005 by the learned Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka, rejecting the applica­tion filed under Sections 12(2) and 51 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 praying for adjustment of the outstanding loan with the sale price of the pledged goods and thereby to fix the actual claim amount in the sui..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 152

A.K. Reazul Karim Vs. State, 1983, 12 CLC (AD)

....tection of crime which can be said to be the main object of having the police. The powers of Customs Officers are really not for such purpose and are meant for checking the smuggling of goods and due realisation of customs duties and for determining the action to be taken in the interest of the reve......s are allowed. Proceedings are quashed and the judgment of the High Court Division is set aside. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (AD) (1984) 113. ..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 129

M/S M.M. Steel Mills Ltd & anr Vs. Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Ctg & anr, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....dance with law and therefore no interference is called for. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 875. ......intiff filed Artha Rin Suit No.02 of 2005 in the Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong, against the defendant for recovery of Tk.39,71,334/-contending, amongst others, that the defendant, though enjoyed the loan facili­ties from the bank, failed to repay the same within time or thereafter, inspite of ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99

K. M. Muzahid Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....in. Thus we do not find any merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 865. ......ourt, Dhaka, on 20.04.2004 praying for recovery of money and for foreclosure of mortgage property stating that the petitioner as Managing Director of M/S. Al-Faruque Textile Mills Limited availed a loan facility of Tk.4,39,31,000/- for setting up of a Textile Mills, against which both movable an..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 140

Saiful Hoque Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 187. ...... and Taklima Khatun died on 18.12.1993 leaving her only son, the plaintiff and the plaintiff has been in possession of the suit land by inheritance. To grab the suit land, respondent created false loan case vide Loan Case No.HB-PAB-38(Multi) dated 25.11.1981 and started Miscellaneous Case No.43 ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53

Md. Nazrul Islam and others Vs. Md. Abdur Rouf, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....ns and so there is no illegality or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:  ......ioner No.1 would pay the money to him within 10.11.2003 failing which the petitioner No.1 would transfer the suit land along with the building to him and petitioner No.1 having failed to repay the loan he sent notices on 20.7.2004 and 29.7.2004 requesting the petitioner No.1 to perform his part ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28

Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)

....rt of the District Judge, Dhaka on 28-9-1983 which subsequently, on transfer to the Court of the Subordinate Judge and Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka, was renumbered as Misc. Case No.13 of 1984, for realisation of its dues amounting to Taka 68.46 lakh including compensation. In that procee­din...... renumbered as Misc. Case No.13 of 1984, for realisation of its dues amounting to Taka 68.46 lakh including compensation. In that procee­ding Tapashee Shipping Lines Ltd., to which the disputed loan was granted, was made opposite party No.1 and its directors were made oppo­site parties No..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 311

Golam Rabbani Vs. Chairman, Court of Settlement and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

....e circumstances, we do not find any cogent ground to review the impugned judgment, Accordingly, the review petition is dis­missed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 BLD (AD) (2009) 71. ......001 dismissing the same with cost of Tk.10,000/-. 2. Short facts are that the property in question was originally allotted to one Md. Muslim who constructed a two storied build­ing thereon taking loan from the House Build­ing Finance Corporation, entered into an agreement for sale on 28.1.1971 ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32

M/S. Classic Fashion Limited Vs. Mrs. Asrafunnessa Dana and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

.... Security of TK.1000.00 is to be deposited with one month from date. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......nstituted the false suit which is liable to be dismissed as also time barred. On the other hand the added defendant No.2 Islami Bank also contested the suit contending that the defendant No.1 took loan from the defendant No.2 and as per terms of the contract the defendant No.1 failed to repay th..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 110

James Finlay PLC and others Vs. Mahi Fish Processing Ltd. and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....tance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLC (AD) (2009) 124. ...... L/C confirming Bank, did not pay debt as per contract, the factory and business of the plaintiff was inoperative for a long time and accordingly, a huge amount of interest was credited against the loan account of the plaintiff with Agrani Bank proforma defendant No. 7 and due to the negligence o..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 178

Md. Kudrat Ali Vs. Dr. Mahfuzul Haque and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)

....further in review peti­tion there is no scope of rehearing as sought by the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 620. ......oner for submission of four copies to the Office of the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies for the registra­tion of the proposed company and kept the balance copies for using those for obtaining loan etc for the proposed com­pany after its incorporation; while the above copies of the Memor..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44

Cromvege Tannaries Ltd. & anr Vs. Joint Dist Judge & Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....ree dated 10.1.2002 the above suit was decreed ex parte and the above decree was made final on 28.4.2002 for a sum of Tk.12,83,91,013.35 as on 1.7.1997 with interest @20% thereon from 1.7.1997 till realisation and then on the basis of the said final decree Agrani Bank start­ed Artha Rin Execu...... of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 2003 due to non availability of bidder in the auction sale held on 4.4.2005 for sale of the properties mortgaged by the judgment debtor petitioners as security for the loan. 2. The petitioners filed the above writ petition on the averments that they took loan ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103

City Bank Limited Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)

....here is no illegali­ty or infirmity in the above decision so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 563. ......learned Artha Rin Adalat, after hearing, by judgment and order dated 18.06.2007, rejected the above applica­tion for addition of party holding that the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 did not take any loan from the petitioner and the petitioner is also not a guarantor against the loans so taken and ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102

M/s. IBTA Bangladesh (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

...., since reasonings assigned in rejecting the writ petition do not suffer from legal infirmity. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.  Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......m) dated July 19, 2003 passed in Title Suit No. 2 of 2002 by the Artha Rin Adalat-3, Dhaka. The aforesaid title suit was filed by the bank, respondent No.6 in the writ petition, for realization the loan amount with interest. The suit was decreed for Tk.40, 61,701/-. 3. The writ petitioner ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 98

Karuna Enterprise Vs. Joint District Judge, Artha-Rin-Adalat, Narayangonj & Ors., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)

....sion has committed no error of law in its judgment calling for interference by this Division.  Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......thereupon quality of the goods deteriorated and that at one stage bank sold the goods and deposited the proceeds in the account of the defendants; that the defendants having had failed to repay the loan amount and the interest thereof the bank filed the suit. 3.The defendants filed writte..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 91

Munshi Md. Rashed Kamal Vs. Abdus Salam and anoth­er, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)

.... The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 10.3.2002 of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 798. ......that the appel­lant filed a petition of complaint on 11.12.2000 in the Court of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka stating, inter alia, that the respondent No. 1 Abdus Salam took loan of Tk. 1 lac from the appel­lant for three months but he did not refund the money on time ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42