Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7601-7620 of 8151 results.
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......ahadur Vs. Srinath, Chakrabarti 31 C.W.N. 135, Kumar Rai Vs. Baraboni Coal, A.I.R. 1935 Calcutta 36, Jemarat Ali Vs. Rahman Sardar, 17 DLR 589, Pramatha Nath Vs. Kamir Mondal, 17 DLR (SC) 392.
Lawyers Involved:
B. N. Chowdhury, Advocate, instructed by A. Rab-II, Advocate-on-Record—For t...... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....the setting aside of the election of the Vice-Chairman and the members is declared to have been without jurisdiction and as such void. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51. ...... Syed Mofazzal Hossain…………...Appellant. Vs. The Election Commissioner and others……..Respondents. Judgment November 24, 1975. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: Shah Azizur Rahman with Latifur Rahman, Advocates, instructed by B. Hossain, A...... Faqeer Shahabuddin Ahmad, Attorney-General, instructed by A. M. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record- U/O XLV Rule 1 (SC) Appellate Division Rules 1973. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1975 (From the Order dated 3-12-1974 passed by the High Court Division in Petition No. 1473 of 1974). Judgment ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Government and in accordance with the observation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Shanthanand Gir Vs. Mahant Basundevanand Gir, I.L.R. 52 All. 619 same case A.I.R. 1930, All. 225; C.V. Raghavayya Vs. Chamria Talkie Distributors and another, A.I.R. 1958 Andhra Pradesh 31. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallick, A...... of East Pakistan in revision. 4. A Division Bench of the Dacca High Court, in disposing of the revision case, held on consideration of s. 60 of the Code read with sub-rule (c) of rule 46 of Order 21, that money lying as security with the Government for due performance of contract was 'mon..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....section 561A. These appeals are accordingly dismissed. The records be sent down immediately for expeditious disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (1976) (AD) 38. ......ult: The appeals are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Raja Huq Newaz V. Mohd. Afzal, 19 DLR (SC) 369; Muhammad Vs. Muzammel Khan, PLD 1967 (SC) 317, Gianchand Vs. State, 1968 Pakistan Criminal Law Journal (SC) 764, R.P. Kapur Vs. State, AIR 1960 (SC) 866, M.S. Khawaja Vs. State, 17 DLR (SC) 1......cord—For the appellants (In both the appeals). B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In both the appeals). Criminal Appeal Nos. 28 & 29 of 1974. (From the Judgment & Order date 4-8-72 passed by the High Court Division In Criminal Revision No. 360 of 1969). Judg..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 225
Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......Appellants. Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. Lawyers Involved: Aleem-Al-Razee, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.&mda......edures as laid down in section 260 , Cr.P.C. and on conclusion of the trial they were found guilty and convicted under section 19(A) & (f) of the Arms Act read with President's Order No. 50 of 1972, namely, Bangladesh Scheduled Offences (Special Tribunals) Order an..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
The Com. of Income-tax Chittagong zone, Ctg. Vs. M/s Everett Orient Line Corpn, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ......sp; 1948 A.C. 422, and Davigdor Goldsmid Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners 1953 A.C. 347 Income Tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali 1964 (53) ITR, 165; Abdul Wahab Vs. The Crown, 7 DLR (FC) 87. Lawyers Involved: A. W. Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by A.M. Khan C......ght in so far it allowed the three assessees' initial depreciation under s. 10(2)(vi) of the Act. We find no reason to interfere. All the three appeals are dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 134
Government of Bangladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ct, and therefore no question of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......t Davarc Vs. Bala Chandra Ganesh Thakur, reported in A.I.R. 1931 Bom 539; The Governor General of India in Council Vs. Bilas Singh, and Nalini Ranjan Guha Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1954 Cal. 462. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant......n-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From the Judgment and Order dated 9.7.70 passed by the Dacca High Court in Civil Rule No. 1739 of 1969). Judgment: ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone Vs. M/s. Gulistan Cinema Co., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....urally. from them, it is neither arbitrary nor capricious. There is hardly any to disturb this finding of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Provincial Library Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax East Pakistan, PLD 1958 (S.C.) 81; Harjina & Co. (Pak) Ltd., Karachi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) P.L.D. 1963 Karachi, 996. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Chowdhury, Sr. Advocate, instructed by Mr. A. M. Khan Chowdhur......he Appellant. Syed Muzaffar Hossain, Advocate instructed by Mr. M. R. Khan, Advocate-on Record—For the Respondent. (Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1974) (From the Judgment and Order dated 7. 2. 68 passed by the Dacca High Court in Reference Case No. 3 of 1967). Judgme..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Matilal Sikder & ors Vs. Benodini Dasi, being dead her heirs Bepin B Das & ors, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....ordinate Judge are restored. As there is no appearance on behalf of the respondent there; shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 5. ......a Begum and others, 20 D.L.R. (Dacca) 480; Mohammad Hossain Khan and others Vs. Babu Kishva Nandan Shanai L.R. 64 I.A. page 250 = A.I.R. 1937 P.C. 233 (same case) 41 C.W.N. 1029. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, with A. K. M. Siddiq, Advocate, instructed......dvocate, instructed by A. W. Mallick, Advocate-on-Record—For theAppellant Ex-parte— the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1974. (From the Judgment and Order dated 28-1-69 passed by the Dacca High Court in Civil Revision No. 818 of 1962). ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Ayub Ali Howladar Vs. Election Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ......n Tribunal Bagerhat, Khulna and others…...Respondents Judgment Nov. 20, 1975. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim, Advocate instructed by SS Huda, Advocate- on- Record- For th...... in this Division. We do not find any error in the conclusion of the Tribunal, nor in the decision of the High Court Division. The appeal is therefore dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 101
Golam Hafez Mia Vs. Khadem Ali Meah, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ......nda Mallik, 9 DLR 57; Purna Chandra Vs. Dinabandhu Mukherjee I.L.R. 34 Cal 811; Abtabur Rahman Vs. Madan Mia, 19 DLR 333; Tarangini Debi 19 DLR 57; Keramat Ali Vs. Mohammad Yunus, 15 DLR (SC) 130. Lawyers Involved: M. Nurullah, Advocate, instructed by S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the App......s of the arrival of the records in the court below, shall be dismissed with cost. The cost of this appeal shall abide the result of the suit. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 311. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... Board reported in (1949) 1 DLR 81; Ramjan Khan vs. Obaidul Huq.reported in (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 57; and Shahzada Muhammad Umar Beg vs. Sultan Mahmood Khan and another; reported in PLD 1970-SC 139. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khondker, Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the......r, Rashid Khan, Advocates instructed by Abu Backkar, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 2.—Ex parte. Civil Appeal No. 27 of 1975. (On appeal from the judgment and Order dated July 1, 1969 of the High Court of East Pakistan) Judgment Fazle Munim J.- This a..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182
Nuruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......KM Subhan J Nuruzzaman Chowdhury…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others……………...Respondents. Judgement April 7, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Mozammel Hoque, Senior Advocate, instructed, by Abdur Rab-II, Advocate-on-Rec......t Pakistan dismissing an appeal after remand by the erstwhile Supreme Court. Facts leading to this appeal may briefly be stated as follows:—Respondent Nos. 1 to 14 filed under rules 7 and 9 of Order XXXIV of the Code of Civil Procedure, a suit being O/S No. 49 of 1945 in the Second Court of S..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Mannujan Begum Vs. A. Samad Molla & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... unsustainable. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the orders of stay passed by the learned Sub Ordinate Judge are set aside. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......llip;…………………..Appellant. Vs. A. Samad Molla & others................... Respondents. Judgment Nov. 24, 1976 Lawyers Involved: Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record&m......uddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Respondent-Ex parte. Civil Appeal No.5 of 1976 (From the Judgment and Order dated 14-7-75 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order No.1021 of 1975) Judgme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Bikash Ranjan Das Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ......llip;………............ Petitioner. Vs. The Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca and others..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 1977. Lawyers Involved: B.N. Chowdhury, Advocate, with Md. Ismail Khan, Advocate, instructed by S.......c tribunal or not. That a different conclusion is possible is no ground for interference. We therefore do not find any good reason to grant leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 151
Md. Shaukat Ali Mia Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding before the Administrator. Ed. ......lip;…………….. Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgment May 31, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate, with Zahir, Advocate & Md. Akkas......structed by Md. Abdul Aziz Advocate, on-Record—For Respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 1-3-7. Ex-parte. Civil Appeal No. 30 of 1976. (From the Judgment and Order dated the 27th July, 1971 passed by the High Court, Dacca in Writ Petition No.60 of 1969 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rahman and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... In the other case, appellant Maqbool Hossain was tried along with Yasin Ahmed, Ghulam Yasin and another for an attempt to bribe a Tahsilder of Multan. The offence was punishable under Martial Law Regulation No. 30 read with Regulation No. 5. Maqbool Hussain was sentenced to five ye......thers .................Respondents. Judgment March 9, 1977 Cases Referred to- Joygun Bibi State (1960) 12 DLR (SC) 157, Moqbul Hossain Vs. State 12 DLR (SC) 217. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Hossain Khan. Deputy Attorney General with B. B. Roy Chowdhury, Ass......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be sufficient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... The State............ Respondent Judgment January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, ......;Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J: The petitioner along with one Akkas AH Dafadar faced a trial on three charges viz. under section 148 read with Article II(c) of Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunal) Order, 1972, 364/34 and 302/34 in the alternative under section 30.3/109 B.P.C. read with Article I..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent Judgment June 30, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rahman Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record&mdas......th as second appellate court and a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circumstances. With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44
K. M. Zaker Hossain Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....ion and as such there was no question of prejudice. There is, therefore, no question of law which calls for our interference. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ya J Fazle Munim J K. M. Zaker Hossain................Petitioner Vs. The State.............................Respondent Judgment Feb. 21, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T. Ali, Senior Advocate with Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed instructed by A. R......(2) Advocate-on-Record—For the petitioner. Not represented— For the Respondents. Criminal Petition for Special leave to Appeal No.5 of 1977 (From the Judgment and Order dated 27 th August, 1976 passed by the High Court in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 1969) Jud..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
949947946945944943942941940939938937936935934933932931930928