Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7621-7640 of 8188 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Shamsuzzoha Nurul Amin Chowdhury and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... property. After so holding they concluded that the secular part will be distributed to the present beneficiaries of the wakf according to section 20(2) of the Act. This order is challenged by the Government. The question set out above is whether the High Court put a correct interpretation on th......treating the properties belonging to three families of the heirs of three sons of the Wakif. 2. The Province of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) contested the suit asserting that the impugned order of the Revenue Officer under section 20 of the Act is well founded in law and binding upon th..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 142
BD Jatiya Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg & anr.,1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....med the order of the Labour Court is set aside. The order of the Labour Court is also set aside and the petition of Respondent No. 2 is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ate instructed by Md. M. R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 2. Ex-parte—Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal NO. 8 of 1975. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 28th March, 1974 passed by the High Court Division in Petition No. 252 of 1973). ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 144
Md. Amirul Islam Vs. The Hon'ble Judges of the HCD (Sc) of BD & Govt. of BD, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....hat he is in the habit of doing so and he did so in the past too.” be expunged from the impugned remarks. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Ed. ......ents. K. A. Bakir, Attorney-General instructed by B. C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record—U/O XLV, Rule 1, 5. C (A.D) Rules. Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1974. (From the judgment and order dated 16-7-49 passed by the erstwhile High Court of East Pakistan in Criminal Revision No. 51..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 157
FM Rashiduzzaman Vs. Bahauddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
..... P. C. He was of the opinion that since Bahauddin Ahmed was a public servant on duty and that the action he took was in discharge of his public duties, it was necessary to obtain sanction from the Government before he could be prosecuted. The complainant having failed to obtain any sanction from......nant having failed to obtain any sanction from the Government for starting prosecution, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate dismissed the case under section 203, Cr. P. C on 28. 4. 1969. Against the said order of the Magistrate the Sessions Judge was moved under Section-435 read with Section 436, Cr.P..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs. State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....le homicide not amounting to murder and was sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment thereunder. Kishan Singh did not prefer any appeal in the High Court against his conviction. The Provincial Government did not also appeal under section 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but applied unde......he appellant. A.T.M. Afzal, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal appeal No. 3 of 1975. (From the judgment and order dated 24-7-1972 passed by the erstwhile High Court of Bangladesh in Criminal Appeal No. 581 o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
M.A. Zaher and others Vs. Mainuddin Ahmed and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....filed a suit against (1)The Chairman, Narayanganj Municipality, (2) The Narayanganj Municipal Committee, (3) The Commissioner, Dacca Division and Controlling Authority of Municipal Committees and (4) Government of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in the Fourth Court of the Munsif, Narayanganj for perm...... (In all the appeals). Not represented.—For the respondent No. 1 (In Criminal Appeals Nos. 6-D & 8-D of 1971). Criminal Appeal Nos. 6-D, 7-D, and 8-D of 1971. (From the judgment and order dated 15-4-68 passed by the erstwhile High Court of East Pakistan in Criminal Miscellaneous Ca..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 142
Sirajuddin alias Siraj Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e find no reason for reversal of the decisions of courts below and hence dismiss the appeal. The appellant must now surrender to his bail and serve out the remainder of the sentence. Ed. ...... Appellant. M.A. Rouf, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.W. Mallick, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1974. (From judgment and order dated the 9th February, 1970 passed by the High Court, in Criminal Revision No. 149 of 1969.)..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Swami Joytirghananda Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Khulna and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....er discharging the Rule are set aside and the Petition No. 245 of 1966 is restored to file for hearing according to law. There shall, however, be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......p; Advocate-on-Record—Respondents Nos. 3(2)-3(7) Ex parte—Respondents No. 3(1). Civil Appeal No. 29-D of 1969. (From the Judgment and order dated 26th and 30th January, 1969 passed by the Dacca High Court in Petition No. 245 of 1966)..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Dacca Improvement Trust Vs. Waliullah and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... a formal decree, as a matter of fact, was prepared after the filing of the said appeal. The result, therefore, is that the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Judgment: D. C. Bhattacharya, J.—This appeal by special leave is at the instance of" Dacca Improvement Trust (hereinafter referred to as (DIT) against a judgment and order of a Single Judge of the Dacca High Court reversing a concurrent order of rejection of the p..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Ata Hossain Khan Ltd., 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....aterial to show the quantity and value of the closing stock, the profits or loss can easily be ascertained, and so, the absence of a regular stock register or a stock register kept according to the Government notification under the Textile" Control Regulations would not be sufficient ground to r......come-Tax Reference Case No. 14 of 1966) Judgment Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya, J.—This appeal by special leave is against a judgment of a Division bench of the Dacca High Court on a reference order section 66(1) of the Income-Tax Act holding that the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal was not jus..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 164
Jardine Henderson Ltd. Calcutta, India Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Chittagong, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
...., the managed company had several mills operating in India and also some immovable properties including certain godowns in the then Pakistan (now Bangladesh) most of which were requisitioned by the Government of Pakistan. 7. According to the Revenue the income in question arose out of the ...... to the operations in Pakistan was computed on the basis of what was called the Two-man Committee's decision. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal after rejecting the appeal preferred against the orders of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner referred the following questions for the opinion of..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Abul Hossain & ors. Vs. The State and anr., 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....e learned counsel on the facts and circumstances of the case, there arises no question for review of the decision of this Division. In the result, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d by Abu Bakkar, Advocate-on-record—For the Petitioners. Not represented—For the Respondents. Criminal Review Petition No. 2 of 1976. (Arising out of judgment and order dated 17. 6. 75 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1974). Judgment: Ahsanuddin..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Messres A. T. J. Industries Ltd. and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) 120. ......Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by S. S. Hoda, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-Parte—Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1975. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court Division dated 22. 5. 75 passed in petition No. 1054 of 1974). Judgment ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....xcise Rule end Procedure regarding clearance of stockinet’s on payment of duty. The appellant Company appears to have submitted an application to the Secretary, Central Board of Revenue, Government of Pakistan, on the 13th December, 1968 praying for exemption from the payment of duty o......nd Order dated 1-12-75 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 453 of 1969). Judgment: D.C. Bhattacharya, J.—This appeal by special leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court of East Pakistan dismissing a Writ petition summarily. 2...Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Haji Md. Shariatullah Vs. Ashrafun Nessa Bibi and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
....g regard to the considerations made above we find no substance in this appeal. It is accordingly dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 91. ......F.M.A. No. 59 of 1967). Judgment: Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J.—This appeal by special leave is from a judgment passed by a Division Bench of the Dacca High Court affirming an order of the Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca in Miscellaneous Case No. 50 of 1967. 2. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Mozaffar Ahmed Vs. Md. Osman and anr, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... is .barred by limitation. The appeal shall be disposed of on the evidence already on record. The appeal is disposed of in aforesaid terms without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of the wakfnama is so vague that an executable decree cannot be passed. The decisions of the Court's below cannot stand. 15. We however find that deciding the question of the leave order does not dispose, of the suit. The Trial Court dismissed the suit on three grounds; first, th..Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
.... by this Court to the appellants to consider 3 points namely (i) whether further proceeding in the suit was barred under section 83(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure without permission of the Central Government (ii) whether the Deputy Commissioner had any legal authority to join himself in the suit ......he Judgment and Order dated 28.7.1971 passed by the Dacca High Court in Civil Revision No. 962 of 1967) Judgment Debash Chandra Bhattacharya, J.—This appeal by special leave is against an order of a Division Bench of the Dacca High Court refusing to exercise its revisional jurisdiction t..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93
.... call such additional evidence on the question as it may deem fit.
In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 61. ......nts. We, however, do not feel the necessity of adverting at length to them, as we find that the question involved in this appeal should be disposed of with reference to points raised in the leave order.
8. The points referred to in the leave order, though mentions question of title and posse..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Syed Mofazzal Hossain Vs. The Election Commissioner and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)
....using to interfere with the judgment of an Election Tribunal which set aside the election of the appellant as Chairman of a Union Parishad and certain other persons, held under the Bangladesh Local Government (Union Parishad and Pourashava) Order, 1973 and the rules framed thereunder. 2. An el......1975 (From the Order dated 3-12-1974 passed by the High Court Division in Petition No. 1473 of 1974). Judgment Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J.— This appeal by Special Leave is against an order of a Bench of the High Court Division summarily rejecting an application under Article 102(2) ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)
.... Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government Contractor in O. C. suit No. 59 of 1962. During the pendency of the suit, Respondent No.......he Appellant. S. M. Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—For the Respondent No. 2. Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1973 (From the Judgment and order dated 2. 5. 1969 passed by the High Court of East Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
973971970969968967964963962961959958957956955953950949947946