Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 7961-7980 of 8005 results.
Syed S.M. Hasan Vs. Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....of State for Home Affairs. 1969 2 Chancery 149, Secretary, Ministry of Establishment Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain, 51 DLR (AD) 148. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Rob Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. A.F......on (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Syed S.M. Hasan.............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Banking Division and a......le of equity and good conscious. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without an order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 76. ......le of equity and good conscious. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without an order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 76. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mahmuda Khatun and others Vs. Abul Younus Talukder, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Respondents. Judgment 29th November 1995 Cases Referred to- Pradip Das and others vs. Kazal Das Sharma and others, 44 D.L.R. (AD) 1 Lawyers Involved: S .R. Pal, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, (Shawkat Ali Khan, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, with him), instructed by...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.T.M. Afzal CJ Latifur Rahman J Muhammad Abdur Rouf J Mohammad Ismailuddin Sarker J Mahmuda Khatun and others.......Plaintiff-Appellants. Vs. Abul Younus Talukder being dead his heirs Mrs. Yunus Ali Talukder and others .........Defendant...... the trial Court and rather they accepted it. 8. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case we find little substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... the trial Court and rather they accepted it. 8. Thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case we find little substance in this appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Agrabad Hotel Ltd. & another Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lants Vs. Revenue Deputy Collector, Cox's Bazar & others...........Respondents Judgment 28th November 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by S.R. Khoshnabish Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants A. J. Moh...... cost. Ed. ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ......e discussions made above, we are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in discharging the Rule. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed. No order of cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g University .................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury. .............Respondents Judgment 3rd March 2004. Lawyers Involved: A.F.M. Hasan Ariff, Attorney General, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Subrata Chowdhury, Advo......ivision (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University .................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury. .............Respondents Judgment 3rd March 2004. Lawy......10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Hriday Ranjan Dey & another Vs. Niranjan Dey and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....; Mir Laik Ali Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company (ESSO) and Abdur Razzak, 16 DLR (SC) 287; Akrab Ali and others Vs. Zahiruddin Kari, 30 DLR (SC) 81. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Sharifuddin Chaklade......Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Hriday Ranjan Dey and another................................................Appellants Vs. Niranjan Dey being dead his heirs Probate Dey and others..........Respondents Judgmen......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ......sors of other defendants by a registered kabala on 20.11.1930. The proforma defendant No.8 Ananda after attaining majority affirmed the aforesaid sale of the suit land. During the P.S operation Ram Kumar, the maternal uncle of Abhoy Charan Dey fraudulently got schedule 2 land recorded in his nam..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....titioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior, (Md. Shahidul Alam Chowdhury, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner M......A.M. Mahmudur Rahman J Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Dhaka and Assistant Custodian Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate Building, P.S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 L......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Haque ......Appellant.(In both the appeals). Vs. Md. Saifullah ......Respondent In both the appeals). Judgement 29 July 2003 Lawyers Involved: S.S. Haider, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the appellant Dr. Rafiqur R......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahmad J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Moulana Serajul Haque ......Appellant.(In both the appeals). Vs. Md. Saifullah ......Respondent In both the appeals). Judgement 29 July 2003......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ......cution and got delivery of possession. 6. The case of Moulana Sirajul Haque as plaintiff in Title Suit No. 222 of 1992 in short is that the suit property originally belonged to Kali Kumar Bardhan who had no son. He had only three daughters. After his death his grand son by daughter..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..........Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & others...... .Respondents. Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J M.A. Aziz J Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & others......Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & others...... .Respondents. Judgment 23rd May 2005 ......n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......abala dated 12.01.1977. The C.S. record of rights of the 'Kha' schedule land was prepared and published in the name of Mudhu Lai Bhowmick, Jadu Lai Bhowmick, Ram Ballav Bhowmick, Chandra Kumar Bhowmick and Jageswar Bhowmick as tenants under the landlord. They surrendered their land..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Matlib and others.......Appellants. Vs. Abdul Malik...............Respondent Judgment 8th May 2002. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate and J. N. Deb, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharif...... Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s Quddus.............Appellant. Vs. Administration of Waqf & others.............Respondents. Judgment 16th August 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Abdus Sobhan......dance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioner Not Represented-......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent. C......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition fo......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Ad......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. ......ion (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawy......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lice Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Badruddoza, Adv......rul Kabir Chowdhury J Janata Bank, represented by its Chairman, Board of Directors, Janata Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition No. 13......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002&......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....................Respondent Judgment 27th April 2002 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Not Represented-R......san J Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-Petitioners. Not Represented-For the Respondent. Criminal Petition ...... Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Sh......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on of offence under section 324 of the Penal Code…………………. (16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record......vision (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- for t......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Inv...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
379376375372371370369368365364363362361360359357356355354352