Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the petitioner Not Represented-......me Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mr. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-the Respondent. C......sp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ent 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition fo......sp; Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Judgment 19th May 2002 Panna Biswas…………………Petitioner Vs. The State..........................Respondent Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Ad......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. ......ion (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawy......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lice Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Badruddoza, Adv......rul Kabir Chowdhury J Janata Bank, represented by its Chairman, Board of Directors, Janata Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not Represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition No. 13......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002&......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....................Respondent Judgment 27th April 2002 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Not Represented-R......san J Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment  ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-Petitioners. Not Represented-For the Respondent. Criminal Petition ...... Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Judgment 20th July 2002 Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others………………Petitioners. Vs. The State................................Respondent Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Sh......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on of offence under section 324 of the Penal Code…………………. (16) Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record......vision (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Hasan, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- for t......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Inv...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....uary 21, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. F. Hassan Ariff, Attorney General (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attorney General with him), instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Nitai Roy Chowdhury Advocate instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahid......late Division Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. T. H. Khan, Sen......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers In......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the Court in finding which of the parties have prima facie title and exclusive possession………..(8) Lawyers Involved: Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate within him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Re...... (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury C J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Jobayer Hossain and others.......Appellants Vs. Noor Hafez and another............Respondents Judgment 20 November 20......ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ......ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n C. P .No. 901 of 2002) Md. Idris Ali & others...............Respondents, (in C. P. No. 902 of 2002) Judgment 12th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Md. Badruddoza, Advocate instructed by Mohammad Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner (in all the cases)&......il) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Meghna Textile Mills Limited .........Petitioner.(in all the cases) Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others...........Respondents (in C. P. No. 898 of 2002) Md. Abdus Salam ......six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ......six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ali Jamadar, 6 DLR 478; Sachindra Lal Das and others Vs. Hriday Ranjan Das being dead his heirs: Bimal Kanti Das and others, 40 DLR(AD) 56. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-Ul-Haq, Senior Advocate instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Fida M. Kam......p; Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.A. Aziz, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J M/S. Concord Engineers and Construction Ltd.........Appellant. Vs. The Chief Engineer Road and Highways Department, Government of the People's Republic Bang...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....an Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 44 DLR (AD) 111; SP Sampath Kumar Vs. Union of India, AIR 1937 SC 386; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 357. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-record-For the Respondent......reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka............................Appellant Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others.................Respondents Judgment July 5, 2005. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ...... Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others.................Respondents Judgment July 5, 2005. Cases Referred to- Mujibur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 44 DLR (AD) 111; SP Sampath Kumar Vs. Union of India, AIR 1937 SC 386; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 357. Lawyer..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....dhury J Syed Afzal Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents. Judgment 2nd June 1997 Lawyers Involved: M.A. Wahab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-On-Record...........For the Appellant Sir......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.T.M. Afzal C J Latifur Rahman J Mohammad Abdur Rouf J Bimalendu Bikash Roy Choudhury J Syed Afzal Nowab ...........Plaintiff-Appellant Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others... Defendant-Respondents. Judgment 2nd June 1997 Lawyer......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Husain J Abdul Malek and others.............Appellants. Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other........Respondents Judgment 16th November 2003 Lawyers Involved: Syed Ziaul Karim, Advocate, instructed by Santi Ranjan Karmakar, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. A. J. M......y order as to cost. Ed. ......, felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......, felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Sujit Chandra Roy and others Vs. Abdur Rouf and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....y and others...................Petitioners. Vs. Abdur Rouf and another……….......Respondents. Judgment 5th April 2003 Lawyers Involved: Shamsul Huda Manik, Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. No......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury. C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J. Sujit Chandra Roy and others...................Petitioners. Vs. Abdur Rouf and another……….......Respondents. Judgment 5th April 20......udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ry J. National Bank Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent. Judgment 8th August 2005 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant Shafique Ahm......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain, C.J. Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J. National Bank Limited ............Appellant. Vs. Pragati Industries Limited..... Respondent. Judgment 8th August 2005 Lawye......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108