Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 8161-8162 of 8162 results.

Mayor, Chittagong City Corporation, Chittagong & others Vs. Md. Jahangir Faruk & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....ision (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Mayor, Chittagong City Corporation, Chittagong and others……….... Petitioners Vs. Mohammad Jahangir Faruk and others….......Respondents Result: The petition is dismissed. Lawy...... background of the discussions we are of the view no interference with judgment sought to be appealed is called for. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:...... Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1232 of 2002. Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment and order dated May 7, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2715 of ...... background of the discussions we are of the view no interference with judgment sought to be appealed is called for. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 96

M. A. Rashid and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....(Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J M. A. Rashid and others……….....Petitioners Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others .........gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......tion for Leave to Appeal No. 591 of 2002. Judgment Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- At the instance of the writ petitioners this petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.10.2001 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 940 of 1995 dischargin......gment and on the reasoning given above we are of the view that the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74