Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Hamida Begum Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder son of Late AbÂdul Mannan Sikder and others………………State Judgment June 15, 2005. Result: Rule is absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. Mosharef Hossein Sikder son of Late AbÂdul Mannan Sikder and others………………State Judgment June 15, 2005. Result: Rule is absolute. Lawyers Involved: Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. A.B.M. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 2
Emarat Ali Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
..............................Opposite Party Judgment June 14, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the petitioner is entitled to con...................Opposite Party Judgment June 14, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the petitioner is entitled to condonation of d..Category: Criminal Law, Limitation Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 1
Khaled Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....;…………………………………………Opposite Party Judgment June 13, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Md. Saleh and another Vs. Messrs United Grain &......ct legal duty to furnish a reasonable explanation and to show sufficient cause for condonation of inordinate delay. 23. But the accused-petitioner has totally failed to satisfy the court and has absolutely failed to prove the burden reposed on him. The accused-petitioner who was alleged to..Category: Limitation Law | Date: 13 Jun, 2005 | Hits: 2
Mahmuda Begum and others Vs. Chairman, First Court of Settlement and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....egum and others………………………Petitioners Vs. Chairman, First Court of Settlement and others…………………………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Secretary, Ministry of Works and others Vs. Kazi Ash......rs………………………Petitioners Vs. Chairman, First Court of Settlement and others…………………………Respondents Judgment May 25, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Secretary, Ministry of Works and others Vs. Kazi Ashrafuddin Ahme..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2005 | Hits: 33
Abdul Momen Chowdhury and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Rahman J Abdul Momen Chowdhury and others............Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others.............................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Directions sought for the petition to be allowed. Cases Referred to- ...... Abdul Momen Chowdhury and others............Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others.............................Respondents Judgment May 24, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Directions sought for the petition to be allowed. Cases Referred to- Mujibur Rah..Category: Election Law | Date: 24 May, 2005 | Hits: 11
Category: Others | Date: 23 May, 2005 | Hits: 13
New Zealand Milk Brands Ltd. Vs. Sanowara Dairy & Industries Ltd. and another, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)
....s Ltd., of 601, Ramjoy Mohajan Lane, Khatungonj, Chittagong and another…………………Opposite Parties Judgment May 21, 2008. Result: The Rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- "Daiquiri Rum" Trade Mark case, 1969 R.......1, Ramjoy Mohajan Lane, Khatungonj, Chittagong and another…………………Opposite Parties Judgment May 21, 2008. Result: The Rule is made absolute Cases Referred to- "Daiquiri Rum" Trade Mark case, 1969 R.P.C. Vol. 20,..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 21 May, 2005 | Hits: 187
Sheikh Abdul Quddus Vs. Akram Sheikh @ Akram and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
................................................Petitioner Vs. Akram Sheikh @ Akram and others............................Opposite Parties Judgment May 16, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. When accused persons are "daredevils of the locality" The.....................................Petitioner Vs. Akram Sheikh @ Akram and others............................Opposite Parties Judgment May 16, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. When accused persons are "daredevils of the locality" The legal positi..Category: Evidence Law | Date: 16 May, 2005 | Hits: 4
State Vs. Md. Mominul, Md. Kalam, A. Rouf & A. Sabur, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....a facie implicated the accused-respondents in the case and the police upon investigation has submitted charge-sheet against the accused including the accused respondents. After issuance of these Rules by the High Court Division out of which the present appeal arose, the learned Sessions Ju...... the accused-respondents in the case are hereby set aside and the accused respondents are directed to appear before the trial Court to face the trial in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 16 May, 2005 | Hits: 105
Sec. Min. of Works and Urban Dev., Govt. of BD & ors Vs. Rowshan Ara Begum & anr, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....sp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal, by leave, is against the judgment dated November 3, 1991 of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 448 of 1988 making the Rule absolute and thereupon declaring that the property in question has been listed in the 'Kha' lis......bsp; Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal, by leave, is against the judgment dated November 3, 1991 of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 448 of 1988 making the Rule absolute and thereupon declaring that the property in question has been listed in the 'Kha' list of ..Category: Property Law | Date: 15 May, 2005 | Hits: 120
Jamuna Builders Ltd. and another Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....;.Petitioners Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and another……………………..Respondent Judgment May 9, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Authorised Officer, DIT Dacca Vs. Mr. AW Mallik a...... Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha and another……………………..Respondent Judgment May 9, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Authorised Officer, DIT Dacca Vs. Mr. AW Mallik and others, 20..Category: Administrative Law, Company Law | Date: 9 May, 2005 | Hits: 9
Md. Abdul Halim Miah and others Vs. Bangladesh and Other, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... (Annexure-H) wherein the seniority of the writ petitioner-respondents were counted from the date of their ad hoc appointments. 4. In the meantime Ad hoc Service Counting (Seniority Determination) Rules. 1990 was published in Gazette Notification dated 8.11.1990 (Vide Annexure-K) and the relevant......02) heard with Writ Petition No. 5362 of 2000 (Civil Appeal Nos. 70 and 72 of 2002). The said appeals arose out of the same and single judgment and order of the High Court DiviÂsion making the rules absolute in Writ PetiÂtion Nos. 62 of 2000 and 5362 of 2000 declarÂing the impugned order in Memo ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 9 May, 2005 | Hits: 119
Afzalul Haque (Md.) and others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....etitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque………………………..............Opposite Party Judgment May 4, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court Divi...... Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque………………………..............Opposite Party Judgment May 4, 2005. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court Division, in exer..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 May, 2005 | Hits: 25
Bangladesh rep. by the Ministry of Works & ors Vs. Nasima Khatoon and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e. A review application filed thereafter was also rejected. They therefore, moved the High Court Division in its writ jurisdiction. The High Court Division by the impugned judgment and order made the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and order of the Court of Settlement. Hence is this appeal.......review application filed thereafter was also rejected. They therefore, moved the High Court Division in its writ jurisdiction. The High Court Division by the impugned judgment and order made the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and order of the Court of Settlement. Hence is this appeal. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 May, 2005 | Hits: 115
Category: Property Law | Date: 3 May, 2005 | Hits: 3
Md. Farid Uddin Ahmed Vs. Atahar Uddin and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... officer-in-charge of the investment division respectively since 26.12.1984 to 12.10.1987 collusively caused mischief amounting to TK. 4,04,99,052/- of the bank by violating the foreign investment Rules, instructions, and circulars, thereby committed offence of criminal breach of trust and misco...... Send down the lower Court's records at once with a copy of this judgment for information and taking necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 186. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 2 May, 2005 | Hits: 2
Md. Abdur Rahman Faroque Vs. Md. Shamsul Hoque and another , 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... 1998). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant No.2's appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated March 3, 1999 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4237 of 1998 making the Rule absolute which was obtained challenging legality of the order dated August 24, 1998 of the Cour......). Judgment Md. Ruhul Amin J.- This is defendant No.2's appeal, by leave, against the judgment dated March 3, 1999 of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.4237 of 1998 making the Rule absolute which was obtained challenging legality of the order dated August 24, 1998 of the Court of ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 2 May, 2005 | Hits: 119
Anowar Hossain (Md.) and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... 2005. Judgment SAN Mominur Rahman J.- This is an application for addition of parties. The applications also filed a supplementary affidavit dated 24‑4‑2005. 2. It appears that the Rule was issued as to why the order communicated vide Memo No.রাজউক/নঅঅ-১/অসŕ¦......ejected without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 512. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 4
Montu and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....u and others .................................Petitioners Vs. State...................................................Opposite Party Judgment April 20, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Ali and others Vs. State, 37 DLR 261;Nilka......n dated 23‑5‑2004 passed by the learned Magistrate, First Class, Tangail is affirmed. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 504. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 20 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 1
Sultan Ahmed & another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC, (HCD)
....other..........................................Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.......................Respondents Judgment April 12, 2005. Result: The Rules are disposed of. Case Referred to- Chowdhury and Sons Ltd. and another Vs. Governmen......f stay passed in Writ Petition No.8269 of 2002 is hereby recalled and vacated. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 560. ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 12 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 4