Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The Vice-Chancellor Chittagong University .................Appellant Vs. Mohammad Nurul Amin Chowdhury. .............Respondents Judgment 3rd March 2004. Lawyers Involved: A.F.M. Hasan Ariff, Attorney General, Advocate-......10. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellant. The appeal is accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Hriday Ranjan Dey & another Vs. Niranjan Dey and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....l Karim J Hriday Ranjan Dey and another................................................Appellants Vs. Niranjan Dey being dead his heirs Probate Dey and others..........Respondents Judgment July 23, 2002. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Code of Civil Procedure, 19......he High Court Division are set aside and those of the learned District Judge duly affirming those of the learned Munsif are restored. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 16. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ue), Dhaka and Assistant Custodian Vested and Non-resident Property, Collectorate Building, P.S. Kotwali , Dhaka.........Petitioner Vs. Sree Ratan Chandra Roy and others..........Respondents Judgment 23rd May 1999 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior, (Md. Sh......its. 4. No other submission of any significance has been made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Moulana Serajul Haque Vs. Md. Saifullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....rd- For the appellant Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record- For the respondent. Civil Appeal No. 41 and 42 of 2000. (From the Judgment and Order dated 19.03.1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4183 and......t Division are hereby set aside and those of the learned District Judge, Chandpur passed in Title Appeal No. 139 1994 and 140 of 1994 are restored. There is no order of costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & ors Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....uhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J M.A. Aziz J Md. Motiruddin Mondal @ Matiar Rahman Mondal & others......Appellants. Vs. Full Mohammed Mollah & others...... .Respondents. Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan instructed by ASM Khale......n proper perspective and after assigning cogent reasons arrived at a correct conclusion and hence does not require interference by us. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Abdul Matlib and others Vs. Abdul Malik, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K. M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdul Matlib and others.......Appellants. Vs. Abdul Malik...............Respondent Judgment 8th May 2002. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Mahbubey A......ument of Mr. T.H. Khan. Accordingly, we allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division and affirm those of the courts below. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Abdus Quddus Vs. Administration of Waqf & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....vil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdus Quddus.............Appellant. Vs. Administration of Waqf & others.............Respondents. Judgment 16th August 2004 Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advoca......bsp; 16. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. The writ petition is sent back to the High Court Division for disposal on merit and in accordance with law. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Md. Abdul Jalil Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Jalil Khan…………Petitioner Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment 23rd June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by......rit consideration. Moreover, the petition is also delayed by 444 days but the reasons for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 94
State Vs. Abul Kalam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. Abul Kalam...................Respondent Judgment August 3, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Ramzan Ali, Deputy Attorney ......y;dent namely, Abul Kalam, son of late Abdur Rahim of Village-Charlapang, Police Station-Nabinagar, District-Brahmonbaria arrested and to release him on bail to his satisfaction. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Panna Biswas Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ......rred by 324 days and the explanation given for the delay is not satisfactory. This petition on merit as well as on point of limitation has got no leg to stand and hence is dismissed. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Enamul Haque Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Enamul Haque... .............Petitioner Vs. The State..........Respondent Judgment July 20, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Sharif Uddin Chaklader, Adv......greement with the findings and decisions of the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises this petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Janata Bank Vs. Khalilur Rahman, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....airman, Board of Directors, Janata Bank, 110, Motijheel Commercial Area, Police Station Motijheel, Dhaka and others..........Petitioners Vs. Mr. Khalilur Rahman...................Respondent Judgment 19th June 2004 Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by M......ndamental Rule 29 we are of the view that the submission have no substance. We, therefore, do not like to interfere with the impugned judgment and order. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Srwardi Shaikh and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....yed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Srwardi Shaikh and others……….....Petitioners. Vs. The State……………..Respondent Judgment 22nd July 2002 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the ......ecord, the learned Judges of the High Court Division rightly dismissed the appeal. Interference is not called for accordingly this petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Ali Akbor Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Ali Akbor Khan.................Petitioner Vs. The State.........................Respondent Judgment 27th April 2002 &n......ntitled to be discharged from the charge framed against him. 6. In the afore state of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Mazid Sheikh @ Mazid and others Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....r book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ......uld not be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. The points raised merit consideration. Accordingly leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal Vs. The State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Mashuq Mia @ Iqbal ...................Appellant. Vs. The State…...Respondent. Judgment August 14, 2004. The Penal Code, 1860 (XLV ......sion rightly convicted the appellant under section 324 of the Penal Code and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hakim and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Shaw Wallace Bangladesh Ltd..........Appellant Vs. Abdul Hakim and another..........Respondent Judgment 28th July 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate (M. R. Has...... or part thereof from 15th of April, 1971 till alleged termination of his service on 18th January, 1993. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
National Board of Revenue and others Vs. Mustafizur Rahman, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J KM Hasan J Md. Fazlul Haque J National Board of Revenue and others...............Appellants Vs. Mustafizur Rahman ..................Respondent Judgment January 21, 2003. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: A. ......ith reference to the relevant provisions of the concerned SRO. In view of the above matter, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Mohiuddin and others Vs. Shwkat Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain C J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mohiuddin and others...........Appellants Vs. Shwkat Ali and others .......Respondents Judgment 23rd May 2005 Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate......to interfere with the same. 12. On the reasonings stated above, we do not find any substance in this appeal, which is, therefore, dismissed of contest without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J Mohammad Gholam Rabbani J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Jobayer Hossain and others.......Appellants Vs. Noor Hafez and another............Respondents Judgment 20 November 2001. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I......ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43