Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Jobayer Hossain and others Vs. Noor Hafez and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ithout any order as to costs. Accordingly the suit is remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law and in the light of the observations made above. Ed. ......f the suit land, but the High Court Division set aside the decrees of the Courts below without reversing the said finding on possession and thus committed an error of law in passing the impugned judgment. 5. Mr. Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, the learned Counsel for the plaintiff-app..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Meghna Textile Mills Limited Vs. Md. Barkatullah & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....six) months. 9. The petitioners are permitted to add additional ground. 10. The appellants are permitted to make the appeals ready for hearing within 6(six) months. Ed ......bsp; M. M. Ruhul Amin J.- All these petitions for leave to appeal arise out of the judgments and orders dated 03.03.2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
M/S. Concord Engineers & Construction Ltd Vs. Chief Engineer Road & Highways Dept, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the unreasoned impugned judgment and order. For the reason aforesaid, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Mohammad Fazlul Karim J. - This appeal at the instance of the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the judgment and order dated 4th April 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Appeal From Original Or..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 229
Khalilur Rahman A.S. P. S. B Dhaka Vs. Md. Kamrul Ahsan and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 486. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Syed Afzal Nowab Vs. G. M. Yousuf and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e in Bangladesh, the question of forming any opinion by the Government is not at all relevant. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Latifur Rahman J. - This appeal by leave by the plaintiff-appellant is against the judgment and decree dated 5.3.89 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Appe..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Faiz Ahmed and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., felt difficulty to fault with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. We find no substance in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......bsp; Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J: - This appeal is from the leave granted by this Division in civil petition for leave to Appeal No. 654 of 1999 filed against the judgment and order dated 8.3.1999 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2181 of 19..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Sujit Chandra Roy and others Vs. Abdur Rouf and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....udges of the High Court Division rightly passed the impugned order and we do not find any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......te, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Not represented- Respondents. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 81 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 28th April, 2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneou..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104
National Bank Limited Vs. Pragati Industries Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd any error of law and as such it does not call for our interference. 19. In the result the appeal fails. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llant Shafique Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate with him), instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 28 of 1996 (From the judgment and order dated 22.08.1994 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.57 of 1992)..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Shafiqur Rahman and others Vs. Mahbub Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. We do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Mohammad Ali, Advocate-on-Record, For Respondent Nos.1-4 Respondent Nos.5-26- Not represented. Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 503 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 02.11.2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No.377 of 1996..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Sena Kalyan Sangstha Vs. Haji Sufi Fazal Ahmed, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....arned Counsel of the petitioners. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 197. ......nt No. 1 (In both the Civil Review Petitions). Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-5 (In both the Civil Review Petitions). Civil Review Petition Nos. 2-3 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 26th May, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Appeal Nos.45 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Chairman, BADC, Dhaka Vs. S.M. Ali Imam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ......ind merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 83. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Kamal Uddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....commit any error in passing the impugned judgment and order. 15. In view of-the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record For the Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 282 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 08.08.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 103
State Vs. Mofizuddin and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......te.................................Petitioner. Vs. Mofizuddin and others ......... Respondents. Judgment 29 November 2005 Criminal Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 135 of 2O04. (From the judgment and order dated 15.02.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 40 of 2..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Ismat Zerin Khan Vs. The World Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... order of the High Court Division and the trial Court is hereby directed to hear the suit on all issues including the issue regarding maintainability in accordance with law. Ed. ......Advocate instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No.1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-4. Civil Appeal No. 184 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 24 August 2003 passed by the High Court Division in ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 211
Abul Kalam Azad Vs. Govt of BD, represented by the DC, Dinajpur & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fter consideration of all the facts and materials exercised its discretion we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 2003 Lawyers Involved: Md. Nowab Ali, Advocate-on- Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondents Civil Petition For Leave to Appeal No. 1089 of 2002 (From the judgment and order dated 30.4.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Rule No. 110 (con) of ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Anil Ranjan Deb Vs. Yoshodalal Amritalal Shaha Banik & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....agreement with the findings and decisions arrived at by the High Court Division and in such view of the matter the petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No. 1 Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-5. Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No. 1458 of 2001 (From the judgment and order dated 17th April, 2001 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 57..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Hamidul Huque, Managing Director, UCBL & anr Vs. Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ered by the Court. 15. In view of the above, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned order of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......; Rafique-Ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 1st and 2nd November 2003 passed by the High Court Division in Contempt Pet..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Syed Ehsanul Hussain & ors Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ule. Since the High Court Division did not commit any error of law in the decision we are not inclined to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......p; Md. Fazlul Haque, J:- The delay of 16 days in preferring this Civil Petition for leave to Appeal is hereby condoned. 2. This Civil Petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.8.2001 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court Divisio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Md. Nurul Hoque Miah Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....s. 19. In that view of the observation and direction as above, this appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 53. ......ppellant. Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General- For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 257 of 2003. Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.2001 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal dismissing the M..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Md. Mojibul Huq alias Shaikh Md. Mojibul Huq Vs. Md. Yakub Ali, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ons made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 9 MLR (AD) 2004, 181. ......im), Instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- Respondent Nos. 2-7. Civil Appeal No. 52 of 2001. (From the judgment and order dated June 8, 2000 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 5011 ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111