Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 861-880 of 5793 results.
Mukul Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 22. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove as review cannot be granted for merely reexamination of the same argument, the petition for review is dismissed. Ed. ......LC (AD) 219 and 43 DLR (AD) 92. Lawyers Involved: Mujibur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioner. Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md Wahidullah, Advocate-o...... 22. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove as review cannot be granted for merely reexamination of the same argument, the petition for review is dismissed. Ed. ...... J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Mukul …………….Petitioner Vs. State……..Respondent Judgment July 10, 2004. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 100
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....nsel for the petitioner to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ......nsel for the petitioner to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ......nsel for the petitioner to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ...... 51. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 171
Roquib Mohammad Fakrul alias Rocky Vs. Md. Abdul Kashem & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... not find any error of law in the said judgment. For the reasons mentioned above, the appeal appears to be bereft of any sustenance. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... – For the Petitioner. T H Khan, Senior, Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate‑on – Record –For the Respondent No. 1. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney general instructed by Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate‑on-...... not find any error of law in the said judgment. For the reasons mentioned above, the appeal appears to be bereft of any sustenance. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Roquib Mohammad Fakrul alias Rocky…………..Appellant Vs. Md. Abdul Kashem & others ..................Respondents ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 80
Hafez Abdus Salam Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......sion (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Syed AB Mahmudul Huq J Hafez Abdus Salam............................................Appellant Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another............................Respondent Judgment Jun..Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 3
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajshahi Development Authority……...........Appellant Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others.............. Respondents ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......5...Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ......cate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ......t once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J SAB Mahmudul Huq J ACI Ltd..........................................Petitioner Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another.........Opposite Parties Judgment June 2..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......dents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Azmalul Hossain, QC with Reba Kaniz, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Morshed Ahmed Khan with ASM Abdur Razzaque, Advocates—For Respondent No. 2. Writ Petition No. 4339 of 2002. Judgment ......e is an irregular decree in breach of the Rules of Procedure he has cited some decisions of our jurisdiction as well as of English jurisdiction. Reference may firstly be made to the case of Md. Abdur Rashid and another Vs. Abdul Barik and another, reported in 1984 BLD (AD) 83 where it has been obser......57 DLR (2005) 138. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by Deputy Commissioner…….Appellant Vs. Anwara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......AD) 89. Lawyers involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, M Zahir, Senior Advocate and Subrata Chowdhury, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Appellants. Abdur Rob Choudhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑ Fo......aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J AHM Mustain Billah & others…………. Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others ...........R..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
State Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ...... Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji…………Convict (in abscondence) Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 May, 2004 | Hits: 3
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....llip;…………….Respondents Judgment May 5, 2004. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moazzam Hossain with Md. Hasmatullah Sheikh, Advocates‑ For the Appellant. Gazi Md. Neamat Hossain, Advocate‑ For the Respondent...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... Md. Abdul Hafiz J Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another………………&hell..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......tema Bibi Vs. Sree Manik Lal Somaddar, 50 DLR (AD) 97; S.M. Basiruddin Vs. Zahurul Islam Chowdhury and another, 35 DLR (AD) 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Bas......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. .............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank and others......Appellants Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......issed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ....... Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......shyajibi Samabaya Samity Vs. Bangladesh 39 DLR (AD) 85; Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder 8 MLR (AD) 241. Lawyers involved: Rafique ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, Abdur Razzaque, Senior Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
1526315390009430988909595015162888489352261147320902413759136134