Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 861-880 of 3679 results.

Mohammadullah Vs. Abu Taher and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

....ation that judgment and order dated 6-3-1991 passed by No. 3 Noanni Union Parishad Village Court, of Sadar Upazila, District Noakhali, in Village Court Case No. 21 of 1990 in respect of 0.27 acres of land out of 0.57 acres described in schedule of plaint is illegal, collusive and without jurisdictio......l Karim J Mohammadullah………...Petitioner Vs. Abu Taher and others…………..Opposite Parties Judgment March 9th, 2009. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Case Referred to- Hajarilal Mondal Vs. Md. Mozaffor Bepari, 8 BLC (AD) 77. Law......eeing the suit by reversing judgment and decree dated 1-12-1992 passed by learned Senior Assistant Judge, Noakhali, dismissing Title Suit No. 186 of 1991. 2. Short facts leading to this Rule are, that on 5-5-1991, predecessor of opposite party Nos. 1(a)- 1(e) and opposite party No. 2 as plaintiff......M Ziaul Karim J Mohammadullah………...Petitioner Vs. Abu Taher and others…………..Opposite Parties Judgment March 9th, 2009. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Case Referred to- Hajarilal Mondal Vs. Md. Mozaffor Bepari, 8 BLC (AD) 77. ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 48

Dabiruddin Mia and others Vs. Mothaharuddin Miah and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....d order dated 13.4.1995 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Shibchar, in Miscellaneous Case No.69 of 1983. 2. The pre-emptor filed the Miscellaneous Case No.69 of 1983 in order to have the case land by way of pre-emption. 3. The case of the pre-emptor, in short, is that he is a co-sharer te......…….Petitioners Vs. Mothaharuddin Miah being dead his heirs: Marzan Gouch and others…………..Opposite Parties Judgment May 22, 2006. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case referred to- Rafiqul Islam (Md.) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 44 DLR (AD) 176. Lawyers Involved: ......Miscellaneous Case No.69 of 1983. 2. The pre-emptor filed the Miscellaneous Case No.69 of 1983 in order to have the case land by way of pre-emption. 3. The case of the pre-emptor, in short, is that he is a co-sharer tenant by purchase in the case jama. Opposite party No. (in original miscellan...... Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case referred to- Rafiqul Islam (Md.) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 44 DLR (AD) 176. Lawyers Involved: Khan Saifur Rahman with Swapan Kumar Duta, Advocates-For the Petitioners. AKM Shahidul Haq-For the Opposite Party No.1. Md. Mojibur Rahman-For the O..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38

Md. Kamruzzaman and others Vs. Abdus Sattar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (HCD)

....Jabbar Mondal, Belayet Mondal, Del war Hossain Mondal and 5 daughters Zahiron, Suraton, Sona Bibi, Golapi Bibi and Amena Bibi and Chabiron Nessa (wife), as his legal heirs who had been possessing the land in ejmali according to their respective share. That during the last R.S. settlement the caretak......rs……………………………petitioners Vs. Abdus Sattar and others………………………….Opposite parties Judgment July 8, 2008. Result: The rule is discharged. Case Referred to- Daibakilal Vs. Iqbal Ahmed, 17 DLR 119; Hupen Majhi Vs. Abdul Khair, 25 DLR 3; P......de or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The facts involved for disposal of the rule are as follows: The plaintiff's case in nutshell was that the suit jote originally belonged to one Dost Mahmud Mondal. Dost Mahmud died leaving behind 3 (......qbal Ahmed, 17 DLR 119; Hupen Majhi Vs. Abdul Khair, 25 DLR 3; Paul Reinhurt Ltd. Vs. Prime Textiles Spinning Mills Ltd., 22 BLD 41. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Samad with Bazlul Kabir, Advocate - For the Petitioners. Abdul Matin Mondal, Advocate - For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48

Sufi Samrat Hazrat Mahbub-e-Khuda Vs. RAJUK and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....ing structure of the petitioner on holding No.1/2/E South Kamlapur, Dhaka should not be declared to have been issued without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. 2. The petitioner purchased land measuring 17.77 khatas appertaining to CS plot No.114, SA Plot No., 487 RS Plot No.878 by regis......………………..Petitioner Vs. RAJUK represented by chairman and others…………………………Respondents Judgment March 15, 2007. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Jamuna Builders Ltd. Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha, 57 DLR 762. Lawyers I......etitioner on holding No.1/2/E South Kamlapur, Dhaka should not be declared to have been issued without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. 2. The petitioner purchased land measuring 17.77 khatas appertaining to CS plot No.114, SA Plot No., 487 RS Plot No.878 by registered deed dated 29-6-......te. Case Referred to- Jamuna Builders Ltd. Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha, 57 DLR 762. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan with Syed Mokaddas Ali and Syed Golam Mostafa, Advocates - For the Petitioner.  Rehana Malek, Advocate - For Respondent No.1.  Writ Petition No...

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Shafiqul Islam Khan Vs. The Commissioner of Taxes, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)

....record. 10. Admittedly the Assessee-Applicant taken loan from Exim Bank in the name of his partnership firm ‘Shafique and Sons and used the loan money in constructing building upon his ownership land at plot No. 60, Road No. 5, O.R. Nizam Road, Chittagong. The DCT concerned denied to accept thi......ingly. FRM Nazmul Ahasan J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ......ed by the Assessee-Applicant, Shafiqul Islam Khan, seeking an opinion from this court; (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law not holding that the AACT as well as the DCT acted illegally in treating the investment under Section 19(3) and 1......erence succeeds. The connected Rule being No. 20(ref)/2007 is disposed off. Lawyers Involved A. J. Mohammed Ali, Advocate with Hassan M.S. Azim, Advocate with Kamal Hossain Meahzi, Advocate-For the Assessee-applicant. Mrs. Mahfuza Begum, Assistant Attorney General-For I.T. Department. ..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 83

Metro Makers and Developers Limited and others Vs. Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers’ Association Limited (BELA) and others, 2012, 41 CLC (AD)

.... Plan will have devastating environmental effect for which the Master Plan in clear terms prohibited residential, commercial and industrial developments in those Zones, including raising the level of land plain through earth filling in Flood Flow/Sub- Flood Flow Zones. The said Master Plan in catego......rman, Rajdhani Unnyan Kartipakka (RAJUK) and others………Respondents (In Civil Appeal No.255 of 2009) Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association, represented by its Director, Syeda Rizwana Hasan and others……………………Respondents (In Civil Petition No.1689 of 2006) Judgment......lhi, AIR 1981 SC 746; Charan Lal Sahu Vs. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 273 & 1480; Subash Kumar Vs. State of Behar, AIR 1991 SC 420 M.C. ; Mehta Vs. Kamal Nath and others, (1997) 1 SCC 388; Manju Bhatia Vs. New Dellhi Municipal council (1997)6 SCC 370; Sharif Nurul Ambia Vs. Dhaka City Corporatio......p;Lawyers’ Association (BELA)………Appellant (In Civil Appeal No.253 of 2009) Anser Uddin Ahmed and others…………………Appellant (In Civil Appeal No.254 of 2009) Managing Director, Metro Makers and Developers Limited………………..Appellant (In Civil Appeal No.255 of 2009..

Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 434

Dr. Jadu Das Gupta alias J.D. Gupta Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

.... and in the light of our observation made out in the body of the judgment. Send a copy of the judgment to the court below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 454. ......s also Reported in: 14 MLR (HCD) (2009) 454. ......rt may deem fit and proper. 2. By the said Rule issuing order, all further proceedings of the said G.R. Case were also stayed. 3. The facts relevant for the purpose of disposal of the Rule are that one Md. Abdul Karim lodged FIR with Taknaf Police Station alleging that the accused No.1 Bimol D...... Dr. Jadu Das Gupta alias J.D. Gupta Son of late Ramesh Das Gupta Village-Barkhain, Thana-Anowara, District-Chittagong/ at present Purba Goshail Dauga Kali Bari , Binagline Apon Bhavan, Thana-Doublemorring, District-Chittagong ..............Accused-Petitioner (on bail). Vs. The State, repres..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62

Mst. Rahima Khatun and another Vs. Sree Monoranjon Saha and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....s instituted Title Suit No.400 of 1981 in the Court of learned Munsif, Satkhira impleading the opposite parties as defendants praying for a decree for title and confirmation of possession in the suit land stating, inter alia, that total khash land measuring about 2.08 acres as described in CS Khatia......………………………Petitioners Vs. Sree Monoranjon Saha and others…………………………Opposite Parties Judgment April 10, 2006. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Nowsha Miah Vs. Md. Idris Ali,10 DLR 441; Shrashi Bala Sarker and others Vs. Pa......e lower Court's records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 334. ......13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 334. ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57

Chairman, Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakha Vs. Ramjan Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....le, in brief, are as under: The plaintiff opposite parties had filed Title Suit No.255 of 1999 in the Court of 2nd Assistant Judge, Dhaka for a decree for permanent injunction for 17½ decimals of land of C.S. plot no.88 as described in the schedule of the plaint (hereinafter referred to as the "......l Hossain and others……………………………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment October 19, 2006. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Shah Md. Khasruzzaman with Rashma Sultana-For the Petitioner.  Mahbubey Alam with Md. Harun-Or-Rashid-F......haka for a decree for permanent injunction for 17½ decimals of land of C.S. plot no.88 as described in the schedule of the plaint (hereinafter referred to as the "suit land") asserting, inter alia, that the owners of C.S. plot no.88 measuring a total area of 35 decimals were Sk. Rahamali and Sk. Am......…………………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment October 19, 2006. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Shah Md. Khasruzzaman with Rashma Sultana-For the Petitioner.  Mahbubey Alam with Md. Harun-Or-Rashid-For the Opposite Parties.  ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 56

Momin Miah & others Vs. Md. Shafiullah Patwari and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....96 and laid suit in Court seeking relief stated above. b. Plaintiff-opposite party had strained relationship with his father and brothers, Second-Fourth opposite parties, in respect of purchase of land under Pre-emption Miscellaneous Case who in order to deprive him of land purchased only by him ......…………………Petitioners Vs. Md. Shafiullah Patwari and others…………………………Opposite Parties Judgment April 29, 2007. Result: The rule is disposed of. Cases Referred to- Upendra Chandra Rishi Vs. Sufia Begum, 42 DLR (AD) 285; Bangladesh Vs. Chand Mi......g petitioners and Second-Fourth: opposite parties and other persons as defendants instituted a suit being Title Suit No.10 of 1996 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Kachua, Chandpur for a declaration that ex parts order dated 24-4-1988 recorded in Pre-emption Miscellaneous Case No.66 of 1984 is fraud......April 29, 2007. Result: The rule is disposed of. Cases Referred to- Upendra Chandra Rishi Vs. Sufia Begum, 42 DLR (AD) 285; Bangladesh Vs. Chand Mia, 44 DLR (AD) 98; Santosh Kumar Chakraborty Vs. MA Motaleb Hossain, 36 DLR (AD) 248; Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ramananda Sarker,54 DLR (..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Advocate Manzill Murshid and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....803;Khandakar Ehteshamuddin Ahmed @ Iqbal-Bangladesh 33 DLR (AD) 154; Baker Vs. Carr (396 US 186:1962); AIR 1965 S.C. 747; Packer Vs. Packer 1954; OBG Vs. Allan 2008 Ac-1.; Attorney General Vs. Mulholland (1963 2QB 477); Mayor of St. Mellon’s RDC Vs. Newport Corporation 1952 AC 189; AIR 1951 S.C 4......et Secretary, Cabinet Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, P.S. Shahbag, District: Dhaka and others…..............Respondents Judgment June 15, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Bihar Vs. Subhash Singh AIR 1997 S.C.1390; Marbury Vs. Madison 1803;Khandakar E...... of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (as of Annexure-D) and/or why such other or further order or orders as this Court may deem fit and proper, should not be passed.” 2. The petitioners, stating that they are the president and secretary respectively of the organization named “Human Rights And ......Tagore J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 413

Topesh Narayan Saha and others Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)

....and 1713 prepared in the names of writ petitioners in compliance with a common order passed in Appeal Nos.6282 and 6284 of 2010. 3. Facts relevant for disposal of the Rules, in brief, are that the land measuring 69 decimals or thereabout appertaining to C. S. Khatian No.180, Plot No.595 and 04 de......nment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others ................Respondents (In both the writ petitions) Judgment November 5, 2012. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- 14 MLR (AD) 401, para-8; 11MLR (HC) 256. Lawyers Involved: Mrs. Nahid Yes......ssed by the Zonal Settlement Officer, Comilla in Miscellaneous Case Nos.12-13 of 2011 under rule 42A of the Tenancy Rules, 1955 (in brief Tenancy Rules) allowing the cases and thereby canceling D.P. Khatian Nos. 1712 and 1713 prepared in the names of writ petitioners in compliance with a common orde...... Judgment November 5, 2012. Result: Both the Rules are made absolute. Cases Referred to- 14 MLR (AD) 401, para-8; 11MLR (HC) 256. Lawyers Involved: Mrs. Nahid Yesmin, Advocate-For the petitioners. Moinuddin with Mrs. Anjuman Ara Begum, Advocates-For respondents 6-7. Gout..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65

Hachina Begum and others Vs. Abdul Mannan and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....he Court of Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Barisal impleading the defendants for declaration of title on the averments that one Abdul Kader Mia, the predecessor of the plaintiffs was owner of the suit land appertaining to C.S. dag Nos. 1194 and 1195 of Mouza Char-Vaduria measuring about 17.33 acres o......……….Respondents Judgment August 2, 5, 8, 2010. Result: The appeal is allowed. The limitation will start not from the date of publication of record of right, so long any dispute as to title and possession is not raised . . . the wrong record of right by itself does not constitu......cree dated 29.8.1980 (decree signed on 4.9.1980) passed by the then Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Barisal in Title Suit No. 23 of 1978 dismissing the suit. 2. The facts of the case, in-short, are that the present appellants as plaintiffs instituted a suit being Title Suit No.23 of 1978 in the Cou......hers………………………………….Respondents Judgment August 2, 5, 8, 2010. Result: The appeal is allowed. The limitation will start not from the date of publication of record of right, so long any dispute as to title and possession is not raised . . . the wrong record of..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 146

Md. Sazzad Hossain Vs. M/S. Kaderia Publication and another, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)

....enants sold the suit property measuring 4½ kathas on 27.03.1990 under registered deed No.3673 to the plaintiff and since then the plaintiff has been owning and possessing the same by demarcating the land with the muli Bamboo fencing and raising muli bamboo house and appointing caretaker thereat. It......……….Petitioner Vs. M/S. Kaderia Publication and another……………………………….Opposite Parties Judgment August 21, 2006. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Lakhmi Bazar Shahi Majid Committee and another Vs. St. Francis Xavier Girls High......d to the court of Joint District Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka, and was renumbered as Title Suit No.271 of 2001. 3. The case of the plaintiff opposite party No.1, in brief, is that the suit property situated within District Dhaka, PS Gulshan appertaining to Mouza Mohakhali und...... is made absolute. Case Referred to- Lakhmi Bazar Shahi Majid Committee and another Vs. St. Francis Xavier Girls High School 51 DLR 557. Lawyers Involved: Garib Newaz with Maksuda Akhter-For the Petitioner. No one-For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3331 of 2002. Judg..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84

Md. Fazlul Haque and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2012, 41 CLC (HCD)

....filuddin. 2. Facts leading to issuance of the Rule, in brief, are that the petitioners’ predecessor-in-interest Abeda Khatun and her co-sharers were the lawful owners in possession of a piece of land measuring .6343 acres at Mouza Ibrahimpur, Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka which was acquired by the Go......desh and others………..Respondents Judgment July 25, 2012. Result: The Rule is disposed of. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Rezaul Hossain, Advocate-For the petitioners. S.M. Quamrul Hasan, Assistant Attorney General-For respondent No.3. Muntasir Uddin Ahmed, Advocate-For responde....../ক.সে dated 1.2.1994 (annex-G to the writ petition) allotting a rehabilitation plot in favour of deceased respondent No.7 Kofiluddin. 2. Facts leading to issuance of the Rule, in brief, are that the petitioners’ predecessor-in-interest Abeda Khatun and her co-sharers were the lawful owner......ioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………..Respondents Judgment July 25, 2012. Result: The Rule is disposed of. Lawyers Involved: Kazi Rezaul Hossain, Advocate-For the petitioners. S.M. Quamrul Hasan, Assistant Attorney General-For respondent No.3. Muntas..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82

Md. Rakibul Islam and others Vs. Anwar Hossain and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

....gainst defendants Anwar Hossain Gazi, Shahanara Begum and Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh as defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for specific performance of contract for selling 1.95 acres of land for a consideration of Tk. 15,000/-, stating, inter alia, that the suit land of Felir Char Mouz......………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment October 12, 2009. Result: The rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: A.Q.M. Fazlul Haque - For the petitioners. M. Hashmatullah Sheikh - For the opposite parties. Civil Revision No.22 of 1999. Judgment Faruq......ment of the People's Republic of Bangladesh as defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for specific performance of contract for selling 1.95 acres of land for a consideration of Tk. 15,000/-, stating, inter alia, that the suit land of Felir Char Mouza and Moheshkhali Mouza within police station Bhederganj distric......Hossain and another………………………………………Opposite Parties Judgment October 12, 2009. Result: The rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: A.Q.M. Fazlul Haque - For the petitioners. M. Hashmatullah Sheikh - For the opposite parties. Civil Revision No.22 of..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 103

Md. Akkas Ali Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

.... in 1952. Since the Union Parishad building is dilapidated, it has not been used for a pretty long time. Furthermore, the Parishad Building goes under water during rainy season almost every year. The land on which the Parishad Building is situated has been threatened by river erosion. The Biaghat Un......s Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 390. ....../অভন-০৩/২০৭/৩২৯ dated 23.04.2009 passed by the respondent No.1 and issued under the signature of the respondent No.2 granting administrative approval for construction of new Biaghat Union Parishad Complex Bhaban at Jogandronagar (Annexure-'G') should not be declared to be witho...... May 31, 2010. Result: The Rule is discharged. Writ Jurisdiciton of the Court The Writ Court under Article 102 of the Constitution can not interfere with the administrative approval accorded by the Government and administrative approval is not subject to judicial review.................

Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 261

Doon Valley Rice Limited Vs. MV Yue Yang and others, 1996, 25 CLC (HCD)

....Malik Sajawal Khan Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Sargodha and another, PLD 1968 (Paragraph 4); Bombay Vs. Ramchndra Dhondo Datar (1); GanPati Nana Power and another Vs. Jiwanabai Kom Subanna(2); Bundi Portland Cement Ltd. Vs. Abdul Hussin Essaji (3); Nanjibhai Jethabhai Vs. Popatlal Shriraj and others (4......aintiff Vs. MV Yue Yang and others………………………..Defendants Judgment July 30, 1996. Result: The applications are rejected. If the Managing Director of the company has no power under the Articles of Association to file a suit on behalf of the company he cannot do s......he vessel. Further the Managing Director of the plaintiff ­company riled an application for the amendment of the plaint under Order 6 rule 17 CPC. In the said application for amendment it is prayed that Plaintiff­ Company be allowed to sign the plaint and the verification to the plaint by striking.......................Plaintiff Vs. MV Yue Yang and others………………………..Defendants Judgment July 30, 1996. Result: The applications are rejected. If the Managing Director of the company has no power under the Articles of Association to file a suit on behalf of the com..

Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 258

Rakibuddin Talukder Vs. Government of Bangla­desh and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)

.... the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No.259 of 1980 in the Court of Munsif, Sirajganj, pleading opposite parties as defendants for declaration of title in respect of 1.83 acres of land out of 9.80 acres described in the schedules ক and খ of the plaint. 3. The plaintiff's c......ukder......................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangla­desh and others.......................Opposite Parties Judgment January 27, 2009. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Amirunnessa Vs. Abdul Mannan Howlader, 17 BLD 251 = 1 BLC 183; Hriday Ranjan De......1984 and dismissing the suit by reversing those of dated 11-03-1984 passed by the learned Munsif, Sirajganj, Decreeing the Other Class Suit No.259 of 1980. 2. Short facts leading to this Rule are that on 04-07-1980, the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No.259 of 1980 in the Cou......heirs: 1(a) Md. Moyezuddin Vs. Ekram Mia Chowdhury, 7 MLR (AD) 7 = 54 DLR (AD) 7; Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) Vs. Abdur Rashid, 5 BLC (AD) 76; Narayan Chandra Dey Vs. Ali Azam Sarder (minor), 1 BLC (AD) 185; Niropoma Ritchel Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil Mea, 41 DLR 467; Akrab Ali Vs. Zahiruddin ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 76

Shahid Mia and another Vs. State and another, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)

....lants are released from their respective bail bonds. Send down the lower Court records at once along with a copy of the judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 303. ......07. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898); section 342 An examination of an accused under Section 342 of the Code is not an idle formality. It has to be carried out carefully in the interest of justice and fair play to the accused and his exami......o suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1(one) year more. 2. The informant Md. Abu Bakar on 27.04.1.996 at 15:30 hours lodged an ejahar with the Kishoreganj G.R.P. Police Station alleging, inter alia, that he along with his two full brothers namely, Humayun Kabir, Abul Kalam and maternal cousin Ziaur ...... March 12, 2007. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898); section 342 An examination of an accused under Section 342 of the Code is not an idle formality. It has to be carried out carefully in the interest of justice and fair play to the accused..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 83