Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
MM Ishak Vs. State and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 4, Dhaka, is hereby quashed. Communicate this judgment to the concerned Tribunal at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 516. ...... Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 4, Dhaka, is hereby quashed. Communicate this judgment to the concerned Tribunal at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 516. ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 25 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 156
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya (RAJUK) Vs. Jahanara Begum & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....UK would make allotment to the writ petitioner, otherwise not. The direction of the High Court Division is modified as above. The petition is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......ers Involved: Shah Md. Khasruzzaman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Waliul Islam, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Petitioner. Not represented‑the Respondents. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 1372 of 2002 (From the Judgment and order dated February 6,2002 passed by the High Co..Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 133
Abdul Malek Sawdagar Vs. Md. Mahbubey Alam and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rts concerned, which would independently dispose of the same on the materials, evidence in the suit and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 18. ...... the Appellant. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate‑on‑Record- For Respondent Nos. 1‑4. Dispensed with‑ Respondent Nos. 5‑ 7. Civil Appeal No. 38 of 2000. (From the judgment and order dated 25th April 1994 passed by the High Cour..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 160
Category: Banking Law, Criminal Law | Date: 19 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 3
M. A. Mazid and another Vs. The Chairman, Chittagong Port Authority and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....equires adjudication of factual aspect by evidence" in the impugned judgment is hereby expunged. With above expunction of the redundant observation, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......bish, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioners. Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mahmuda Begum, Advocate-on-Record- Respondents Nos. 1-4. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 749 of 2004 (From the judgment and order dated 5th January 2004 passed by the High Cour..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 18 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 109
Zamini Bala Das Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....f the trial Court restored. The suit is decreed as prayed for. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 774. ......ined the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and decree dated 10‑8‑03 passed by the District Judge at Narayanganj in Title Appeal No.09 of 03 reversing those dated 1‑12‑2003 passed by the Joint District Judge, Court No...Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 4
Nurul Haque and others Vs. Abdus Salam Chowdhury and ors. 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ment of the High Court Division is not at all a proper Judgment of reversal. Accordingly, the same is liable to be interfered with. The appeal is thus allowed with cost. Ed. ......ul Karim, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab,414 Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 1‑7. Ex parte‑Respondent Nos. 8‑12 Civil Appeal No. 279 of 2001. (From the judgment and decree dated 18‑4‑2000 passed by ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 196
Mukul Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 22. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove as review cannot be granted for merely reexamination of the same argument, the petition for review is dismissed. Ed. ......209;For the Respondent. Criminal Review Petition No. 9 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated April 10, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 60 of 2004). Judgment &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 10 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 100
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....nsel for the petitioner to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ......oner. Rafique‑ul‑Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For Respondent No. 1. Not represented‑Respondent No. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 738 of 2004. (From the judgment and order dated 12th April 2004 passed by the High Cou..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 171
Roquib Mohammad Fakrul alias Rocky Vs. Md. Abdul Kashem & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... not find any error of law in the said judgment. For the reasons mentioned above, the appeal appears to be bereft of any sustenance. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......structed by Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate‑on-Record‑For‑ the Respondent No. 2. Not Represented ‑ Respondent No. 3‑5. Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated 26‑8‑2003 passed..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 80
Hafez Abdus Salam Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......s Salam............................................Appellant Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another............................Respondent Judgment June 29, 2004. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. An application under Order XLI, rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure is ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 3
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ate, (appearing in person), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented‑Respondent Nos. 2‑6. Civil Appeal No. 292 of 2003 (From the judgment and order dated 29th April 2002 passed by the High ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515........ Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah.......... Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others................ Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1998) Pervejur Rahman and others.............. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ......ule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an Order dated 14‑5‑03 passed by Additional District Judge. Court No.2 at Pabna in Miscellaneous Appeal No.22 of 2003, which dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. 2. Opposite party No.1 as..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......of the Constitution will not be of any assistance to the petitioner. 5. Among the cases of English jurisdiction reliance has been placed in the case of Regina Vs. County of London Quarter Sessions Appeals Committee, reported in The Law Reports (1956), Queens Bench Division, 682 where it has been ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......eneral, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on‑Record‑For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 67 of 1998. (From the judgment and order dated August 14, 1994 passed by the High..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... placement in the cadre direct. 6. The learned Counsel has further submitted with reference to the "offer of appointment dated 22‑1‑1982 Annexure‑H providing that "you will be treated as a Class junior to candidate who was appointed in 1983 on the result of 1982 examination or who have be......cord‑ For Respondent No.1. Amir‑ul‑Islam, Senior Advocate, Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 2‑61. Civil Appeal No. 38 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 21st August 2000 passed by the Appella..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ushan Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. Ataul Haque, Advocate‑ on‑ Record‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented‑ The Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 162 of 2003. (From the judgment and order dated the 7th August, 2002 passed by the..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....out of an order dated 6‑7‑1997 passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks, Dhaka removing the name of the appellant from the register as the subsequent proprietor of registered trade mark No.27185 in Class‑25 cancelling his earlier order dated 29‑4-1993 passed on an application filed by the......s allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moazzam Hossain with Md. Hasmatullah Sheikh, Advocates‑ For the Appellant. Gazi Md. Neamat Hossain, Advocate‑ For the Respondents. Trade Marks Appeal No.7 of 1997. Judgment MA Wahhab Miah J.- This appeal under section 76 of the Trade..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4