Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Razzaque Vs. The State & another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ond. Let the trial proceed against' the other accused. Let the record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 70. ......cally charge sheeted in our opinion in the particular facts of the present case it must be held that the taking of cognizance by the Additional Sessions Judge has been clearly in contravention of the provisions of section 193 Cr.P.C. It is necessary to consider the effect of the rejection of th..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Nov, 1982 | Hits: 1
Mohammad Nazrul Islam Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ed under section 561A of Cr.P.C. This Rule is made absolute. The accused petitioner is discharged from his bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 65. ......Powers Act as the case may be, one can always apply for the quashing of such proceeding under section 561A Cr.P.C. Section 29 of the Special Powers Act has clearly provided for the application of the provisions of the Criminal procedure Code so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of..Category: Administrative Law, Criminal Law | Date: 20 Oct, 1982 | Hits: 8
Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Aug, 1982 | Hits: 3
Nurul Islam Vs. The State, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ivisional Magistrate, Madaripur continue in respect of the accused Ashit Aaron Saha and be disposed of expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 33. ......s available, for adjudication of the guilt or innocence of the accused the Supreme Court of Pakistan held that this would obviously be the case where the person concerned is tried under the provisions of the Frontier Crimes Regulation as a Council of Elders is not confined to what may..Category: Criminal Law, Procedural Law | Date: 15 Jul, 1982 | Hits: 1
Dilip Kumar Chakravorty Vs. Abdul Muyeed Chowdhury and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ssed by the learned Subordinate Judge is restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 49. ......order of injunction passed by the Subordinate Judge was not in accordance with law in view of the fact that the Civil court had no jurisdiction to pass an order of injunction in view of the provisions of the East Pakistan Government and Local authority, Land and Building (Recovery of ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 27 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 1
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......the ambit of section 6 of the Admiralty Court Act. The court also repelled the contention of the plaintiff appellant that alternatively the suit was maintainable in the Admiralty Court under the provisions of the Administration of Justice Act, 1956 enacted by the British Parliament, the reason ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3
Abdul Quddus & Another Vs. The State, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....accused appellants under section 366 of the Penal Code is also upheld. Let the lower Court records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 18. ......mmission of the offence was considered to be legally admissible as evidence of conduct in the decision in the case of Rameshwar Vs. The State of Rajasthan, 1952 S.C.R. (India) 377 in view of the provisions of section 157 and Illustration (j) to section 8 of the Evidence Act which is as fol..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 6 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ...... Mohendra obtained a probate of the Will in 1926. Thereafter there was a partition amongst the beneficiaries in 1931. The beneficiaries under the Will made various transfers contrary to the provisions made in the Will. On the death of Mohendra the plaintiff, son of Nikunja prayed for a let..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......similar to 55(1)(e) of the Customs Act, 1969 came up for consideration in Seafarers Inc. Vs. Province of East Pakistan 20 D.L.R. S.C. 225. The Supreme Court observed. "It will be seen that these provisions create a statutory liability on a shipping agent on the basis of the declaration del..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 55(1) (e) of the Customs Act, 1969 came up for consideration in Seafarers Inc. V. Province of East Pakistan 20 D.L.R. S.C. 225. The Supreme Court observed. "It will be seen that these provisions create a statutory liability on a shipping agent on the basis of the declaration delivere..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Md. Reazul Karim Vs. Mst. Shirin Begum, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....adjudication in the light of the observation made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) (HCD) 250 ......t of any earlier date than that of the kabala sought to be preempted be was not entitled to claim rateable preemption. 6. On this point the learned Munsif observed "according to the various provisions regarding contained in S. 96 of the S.A.T. Act the right of preemption accrued ..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 7 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Md. Asghar Vs. Nowab Miah and others, 1892, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ds expeditiously. The connected Rule for stay of further proceeding is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 37. ......shy;cree. (2) No suit shall be instituted for the purpose of obtaining any restitution or other relief which could be obtained by application under subsection (I)". 7. Reading the aforesaid provisions it is apparent that the purpose of section 144 of the said code is defined. It relates to..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Mar, 1982 | Hits: 2
Bashir Ahmed Vs. Abdul Shaheed, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....e sent down at once for expeditious disposal of the suit. Md. Altaf Hossain Khan J.— I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 154 ......ing the acts and circumstances of the case we are of opinion that the learned Subordinate Judge committed no illegality in appointing a Receiver by the impugned order, which is in conformity with the provisions of Order 40, rule 1, C.P.C. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned or..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....delay in filing the enquiry report by the Inquiry Officer has not vitiated the proceeding or the report submitted by the Inquiry Officer. Whether a law enjoining an authority to do a certain thing is mandatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing t......thority. The Local Council Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1968 is applicable in the case of the officers and staffs of Zilla Parishad. In the absence of any other rule modifying the provisions relating to appointment and dismissal in Local Council Servants (Efficiency and Disciplin..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....respondents were called upon to show cause why they should not be directed to restore vacant possession of the premises in question forthwith. 2. Although the petitioner prayed for an ad-interim mandatory injunction directing the respondents to restore vacant possession of the premises forthwit......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......ed in the notice published for the purpose of starting tea plantation on the lands thus leased out. The Tea Board itself was set up by the then Government of Pakistan in accordance with the provisions of Order 46 of 1959 with Head quarter at Dacca and its primary duty was to bring und..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Zainal Abedin & Another Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... transmitted to the appellate Division of this Court alongwith the certificate for leave to appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 77, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 493 ......ears antedated seniority to a freedom fighter, his pay shall be refuted having regard to such seniority, without payment of any arrear pay whatsoever. From the consideration of the aforesaid relevant provisions of the Government Servants (Seniority of Freedom-Fighters) Rules, 1979 it appears that on..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 14 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1
Shahidur Rahman Molla & others Vs. Abdul Halim Molla & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....for preemption are affirmed. In the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 89. ......anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no person shall, after the commencement of this Part, be entitled to purchase or otherwise acquire, except in accordance with the provisions of this part, any quantity of land which added to the total quantity of land already held..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 10 Dec, 1981 | Hits: 1