Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdul Aziz Vs. Election Tribunal and Munsif, 2nd Court, Comilla and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....t touching the ballot papers of the other two polling stations and that insertion in respect of all the three polling stations, Mr. Hosein contends, is very much unlikely. Mr. Ahmed has, on the other hand, contended that the petitioner had alleged mistake In the counting of ballot papers In respect ......t was notified in the official Gazette and petitioner entered into office by taking oath. Bat respondent No, 2 challenged the election by an election petition under section 26 of the Local Government Ordinance, 1976 taking a number of grounds one of which was that there wet a mistake in th......he light of the observations made above. There will, however, be no order at to costs. M.H. Rahman J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 140 ..Category: Election Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 7
Project in charge, Paruma (Eastern) Ltd Vs. Mr. Aminur Rahman Khan and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....ossain has tried to convey from this decision that when advice of a member "is not mandatory" his presence in the sittings of the Labour Court is also not mandatory. Dr. Zahir, on the other hand, has relied on a decision of this Court reported in 27 DLR 158 in which a similar question aros...... 5. The Labour Court is constituted under section 35 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1960. This section provides that a Labour Court shall consist of a Chairman appointed by the Government and two members to be appointed in a prescribed manner, to advise the Chairman, one to rep......s. 760, 734, 735 and 721 of 1976. There will, however, be no order as to costs. M. H. Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 124. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 3
Shnmsul Huda Vs. Jalaluddin Ahmed and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
.... decisions reported in 10 DLR 431, 16 DLR 298, AIR 1943 Cal. 361, AIR 1967 SC 436. 7. Mr. Zahir, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the defendant-respondents has submitted, on the other hand, relying mainly on the rule enunciated in Foss Vs. Harbottle and has contended that the learned......f a Managing Director subject to the approval of the general meeting may also be considered." It is further alleged by the plaintiff that he attended the said meeting but there was no discussion over the election of a new Managing Director. In the Articles of Association of the Company it is th......mmence the trial of the suit within four weeks from the filing of the written statement. Abdul Momith Chowdhury J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 5 ..Category: Company Law | Date: 17 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 8
Commissioner of Income Tax, Chittagong Vs. Consolidated Tea & Lands Co.Ltd, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
.... the fees to the Club is paid for the purpose of entertainment of the officers, which forms no part of the business of the respondent. 4. Mr. Rafiqul Haque, the learned Advocate has on the other hand relied upon a number of decisions of this Court where clause (XVI) of Section 10(2) c......e Appellate Division. The prayer is refused as we do not consider it to be a fit case. Abdul Momith Choudhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 224. ......essman and not of the revenue. It is not disputed that for the officers of the Tea Estates in and around a Club in the name of Balishira Club was set up in the days When the British Companies were in management of the Tea Estates Of the area. It is also not disputed that this is the only Club for th..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 16 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 4
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 7 Feb, 1978 | Hits: 1
Mr. Kalioiuddin Ahmed Vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....ded in the suits. The added defendants in their written statement denied liability and stated, Inter alia, that the Customs authority detained the consignments on 20-4-57 and requested the Railway to hand over goods so that they might be seized. The railway, however, refused delivery on the ground t......The Union of India Vs West Punjab Factories Ltd, AIR 1966 (SC) as page 395; Pakistan Eastern Railways Vs. Matiur Rahman and others (1968) 20 DLR 318; Pakistan Vs. Amin Jute Mills, (I973) 25 DLR 307; Governor-General in Council (now Union of India) Vs. Mussaddi Lal, AIR 1961 (SC) at page 725; 20 DLR ....... There will be no order as to costs in these appeals. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 146. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 31 Jan, 1978 | Hits: 2
Manager, Azizuddin Industries Ltd Vs. Abdus Satter and another, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....egal effect. The impugned order is set aside. In the circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 58 ......been heard together and are going to be disposed of by this judgment. 2. The common petitioner in these petitions is the Manager, Azizuddin Industries Ltd., an industrial concern which was taken over by the Government under the Acting President's Order No.1 of 1971 and which subsequently ve......nts of these cases who were in the nationalised industries would be placed in National Grade VIII. It was alleged by these workers in their respective applications under section 34 that the management by an order dated 2-11-74 Ext. 11 implemented the said recommendation with effect from 1s..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 27 Jan, 1978 | Hits: 1
Madhari Mia Vs. Surjat Ali, 1978, 7 CLC (HCD)
....on of any issue in the previous suit can never be regarded as operating res judicata when the same issue in such subsequent suit has been raised.” 7. Mr. Serajuddin Ahmed has, on the other hand, relied upon AIR-1929, Lah, 596 AIR-1935, Cal. 641 and CWN (XII)-359 in the first case the ques......in this appeal. 2. Facts of the case, so far necessary for disposal of the questions raised before us, are that the plaintiff-appellant claimed to have purchased the suit land measuring a little over 3 acres within the vicinity of the Dacca Airport by a registered kabala dated 5.11.55 from one ......ved in this case we do not make any order as to costs. Send down the records at once. M.H. Rahman J.-I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 84 ..Category: Civil Law, Procedural Law | Date: 20 Jan, 1978 | Hits: 1
Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Nov, 1977 | Hits: 112
Burmah Eastern Limited Vs. Assessing Officer, Narayanganj Range and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....of a holding shall be deemed to be the gross annual rental at which the holding may reasonably be expected to let. It is apparent that the Assessing Officer did not follow the procedure. On the other hand he has revised the valuation in the manner as follows: “In determining a reasonable ......pany incorporated in Bangladesh under the Companies Act, 1913, having its registered office at Strand Road, Chittagong, and a place of business at 32, Bangabandhu Avenue, Dacca-2. The petitioner took over the business and market assets of Burmah Shell Oil Storage and Distributing Company of Pakistan......led to costs which is assessed at 20 gold mohars. A.T.M. Afzal J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 86. ..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 1 Sep, 1977 | Hits: 4
Dacca Match Factory Ltd Vs. Bangladesh Match Company Ltd. Principal-Defendant, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....an Medical Supplies Vs. Farben 21 DLR 945; Mohanlal Harprassad Vs. Firm Lai Mohan AIR (1961) M.P. 237. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Paul with Khalilur Rahman—For the Appellants. Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with A, K. Maintil Huq—For the Rcfpondtni No. 1. Appeal from Or......a (Crescent with a device of horse and stars). From 29.5.73 to 17.6.74 the defendant's Match Factory was under the Bangladesh Fertilizer, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Corporation. On 19.11.74 the Government of Bangladesh released the concern in favor of M/s. M. M. Ispahani the defendant's Cha......hey have been heard together and this judgment will dispose them of. 2. The plaintiff, Dacca Match Factory Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, now placed under the control and management of Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation, has been manufacturing and selling safety ..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 23 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 8
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shamsul Haque and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....8, 1977. Result: The appeal is dismissed Cases Referred to- Labhu Ram Vs. Ram Protap, AIR 1944 Lah. 76; S M. Nripjit Ram Vs. Sardar Satinder Singh, AIR 1955 Pun. 190; Dasulal Bhagchand Lal Vs. Narayan Mahadeo AIR 1937 Nag. 105. Lawyers Involved: Sultan Ahmed, D.A.G.&mda......the Appellant. Abdur Rashid Gazi—For the Respondent. Appeal from Original Order No. 356 of 1976 Judgment Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury J.-This appeal is at the instance of the Government against the Judgment and award dated 17-4-75 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and A......he parties will bear their respective costs of the appeal and the cross-objection. S.M. Mohsen Ali J.-I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 349. ..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 2
Ayaz Bahdaur Khan & others Vs. Abdus Sobhan & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....him to sign and return those documents on the plea that those papers would be necessary for the purpose of protecting his property. Accordingly, he signed those papers in presence of B.K. Rakshit and handed them over to Mr. Rakshit who in his turn handed over the same to the plaintiff at Dacca. Thes......agong in Other Suit No. 3 of 1975. This judgment will dispose of them all. 2. Defendants are the appellants and the suit was for declaration of the plaintiff's title to the suit property, recovery of possession and for mandatory injunction. The case of the plaintiff, as set out in the plain......e made absolute. The suit is dismissed on context with costs. M.H. Rahman J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 15. ..Category: Contract Law, Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 10
Md. Ajmal Khan Vs. Chairman, Ctg. Pourashava and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....bidders also objected to the manner of auction on the ground of inflated income. The respondents asserted that the petitioner did not express his willingness to retire from the lease but on the other hand approached the respondents for time for depositing the security money as he could not procure m......earnest money and security money and to release him from the bid. But the pourashava, it seems, had contemplated some other actions as it appears from Annexure H in which it is mentioned steps for recovery of other dues payable by M/S. Khan and Brothers in this regard are under examination and neces......s rule is made absolute with cost which is assessed at 30 gold mohors. Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 316. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 17 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 5
Category: Criminal Law | Date: 11 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 4
Akrab Ali and others Vs. Zahiruddin Kari and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
.... order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 81. ......is against a judgment of a Bench of the High Court Division, allowing a Second Appeal and restoring the judgment and decree of the trial Court by which a suit for declaration of title and for recovery of possession of certain lands, brought by Respondent No.1, was decreed. 2. Respondent No......Division are set aside and those of the Court of Additional District Judge are restored, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (AD) (1978) 81. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 3 Aug, 1977 | Hits: 113
Mohd. Mazibar Rahman Mia Vs. Naresh Chandra Guha, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....h Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Mohd. Mazibar Rahman Mia............Petitioner-Appellant Vs. Naresh Chandra Guha…………………….Principal-Opposite-party......April, 1966 and Rs 6000/- on the 4th January, 1967 from the petitioner and on 4-1-67 he acknowledged the debt granting a hand note and entered into a contract with the petitioner. After failing to recover the amount from the deceased (be petitioner instituted Money suit No. 6 of 1969 in the Court of......d order of the learned District Judge are confirmed. There will be no order as to costs. Shahabuddin Ahmed J. - I agree. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (HCD) (1979) 213 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 29 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
Sreemati Tripti LalaKar Vs. Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....fering with the plaintiffs long standing possession in the suit premises. 2. The then Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and the then Province of East Pakistan were the two principal Defdts. and Khitish Chandra Kar the husband of the plaintiff was the proforma defendant in the suit. The only point invol......r father-in-law.). 7. The plaintiff's case is that the property in question originally belonged to her father. She was born and married there and her father allowed her to reside therein and over and above inducted proforma defendant No. 3 as 'Gharjamai' providing suitable accommoda......ed son-in-law. 11. Mr. Ismailuddin Sarkar, the learned Assistant Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that by the "Anumati Patra" she has been given charge of management of the house only and nothing else. From the plain reading of Ext. 1 it is abundantly cle..Category: Property Law | Date: 8 Jul, 1977 | Hits: 2
M. A. Khalilullah and Abdul Hakim Vs. Government of Bangla¬desh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
.... Government of Bangladesh and others.......................Respondents Judgment June 29, 1977. Result: The Rules are made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Amir Hossain Khandker, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M.M. Hague, A.A.G. with QuaziShafiuddin A.A.G.&mdas......ourt Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Ruhul Islam CJ M. H. Rahman J M. A. Khalilullah and Abdul Hakim..............................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others.......................Respondents Judgment June 2......fect. Therefore, the Rules are made absolute. We make no order as to costs. M. H. Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 79. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 29 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 3
Jogesh Chandra Datta Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh, 1977, 6 CLC (HCD)
....D) (1978) 219. ......d by the learned Magistrate on 12. 5. 69. The matter was heard by the learned Additional or Sessions Judge of the 1st Court, Dacca, who, however, rejected the revisional application preferred by the Government. Subsequent to that the Assistant Collector of Customs of Excise, Division I passed an ord......, therefore, discharged, but without any order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (HCD) (1978) 219. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 21 Jun, 1977 | Hits: 1