Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 901-920 of 2270 results.

Shahr Banoo Mohsin Asgar and another Vs. Lailun Nahar Ershad and others, 1991, 20 CLC (HCD)

....40 DLR 239. 11. Similar view was also expressed in the case of Baidynath Dubey Vs. Deonandan Singh, 1968 SCD 275 where the Supreme Court of India held that a court has inherent powers to recall orders obtained by practising fraud on it, at the instance of a party to the. proceedings and then i..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 130

Shewe Hla Prue TK Vs. Commissioner, Chittagong Division, Chittagong and others, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

....He was also, appointed as Regular Headmen of Naithong Mouza by an order contained in Memo No.340/(5)/T. dated 18.1.77 issued by the Deputy Commissioner Chittagong Hill Tracts. Copies of the aforesaid orders of appointment are annexed to the petition and marked as Annexure B and B‑1. The petitioner..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 171

Mrs. Nafiza Mariam Vs. State, 1985, 14 CLC (HCD)

....ed in custody (which evidently inclu­des a detention in police custody on the basis of an order of remand to police custody for a period not exceeding fifteen days. In this case, the Magistrate gave orders detaining the accused for a further period of 10 days after expiry of 15 days and sending him..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 116

Chairman, Chittagong Port Autho­rity, Chittagong Vs. Kalipada Dey & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....t, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs and the impu­gned order is set aside. Mohammed Abdur Rouf J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 39. ..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 204

Wing Commander M Hamidullah Khan Bir Protik Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....es Tribunal and why the respondent should not be directed to produce a list of 3 millions martyrs who made the highest sacrifice in the War of Liberation in 1971 and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. The Rule is made returnable within 4(four..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 314

Mohiuddin Ahmed and others Vs. Government of Bangla­desh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....on an application by the defendant-petitioners without framing issues and taking evidence in the suit. 11. We have heard the learned Advocate of both the sides and perused the plaint, Judgment and orders of the Courts below, Revisional application, the supplementary affidavit and counter affidavi..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 121

Shahidul Islam Vs. State and another, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....'s Bazar in Session Case No.124 of 2007 framing charge against the accused-petitioner under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Relevant facts for disposal of the Rul..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 114

Abu Bashar (Md.) and others Vs. Md. Raja Meah and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)

....ment-debtors. I appreciate this submission of the learned Advocate of the decree-holder-opposite party. 8. Heard the learned Advocate, perused the revisional application, the impugned judgment and orders and the records. From the order dated 11-1-2004 passed by the learned Assistant Judge it appe..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 166

Dr. Md. Rahmat Ali Vs. State, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)

....d Magistrate, 1st Class and Ain Sringkhala Bighnakari Aporadh (Druto Bichar) Adalat, Dinaj­pur in Hakimpur PS case No.5, dated 13-3-2007 should not be set aside and or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The prosecution case, in short, is tha..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 87

Badiul Alam Vs. Md. Nurul Islam, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....n was that the learned lower appellate Court has rightly passed the judgment and order which should not be disturbed. 8. Upon hearing the learned Advocate and perusal of the impugned judgments and orders of the Courts below and other materials on record it appears that there have arisen the quest..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 132

Haripada Mandal Vs. Bidhan Chandra Mondal, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....‘emption proceeding on setting aside order of dismissal. Pre‑emption proceeding under section 96 of The Act cannot be characterised to be a suit. Order XLIII, rule 1(c) shall apply only in cases of orders springing out of Suits. (Emphasis put) 5. Our Appellate Division in Belayet Hossain and an..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 104

Al-Amin Construction Co. Ltd. Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)

....eted construction of many bridges. At the moment it is engaged in constructing Moheshkhali Bridge, Dharla Bridge, Bancharampur Bridge and the construction of superstructure of Daratana Bridge. Work orders for the above works have been issued on 10‑2‑2000, 15‑2-2000, 14‑11‑1999 and 7-6-..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 207

Dr. MB Rahman Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Taxes, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....ned assessment. The law authorizes him to make an assessment of the income of the assessee-petitioner. He is also required under section 8 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 to observe and follow such orders, directions or instructions as the National Board of Revenue may issue from time to time in t..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 170

Rehanuddin & others Vs. Abdul Hakim Maser and others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....s' application under section 151 C.P.C. aga­inst the order dated 20.09.1978 accepting Commissioner’s report. 7. Under the provisions of section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure the appealable orders are specified in Order 43, rule 1, C.P.C. Order 43, rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code does n..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106

Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Government of the Peo­ple's Republic of Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

.... the applica­tion for appointment of receiver and the order of appointment of the receiver was made arbitrarily without affording any opportunity of hearing to the original plaintiff and as such the orders of the Courts below are not sustainable in law. 5. Mr. Humayun Habibur Rasul, the learned ..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 139

Serajul Alam Khan Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (HCD)

....h Court and after 1972 the High Court Division of this court consistently held that where the petitioner has challenged his detention as illegal and detention is defective and continued by successive orders and the detaining authority fails to show that any of the succes­sive orders are illegal the..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 156

Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Monsur Ali Akanda and others, 1990, 29 CLC (HCD)

....said opposite parties along with other employees of the banks went on strike on and from 10th September, 1981, but the Assistant General Manager of the Pubali Bank, Regional Office, Mymensingh issued orders on 22nd September, 1981 terminating their employment. In the circumstances they brought two s..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 176

Liton Vs. State and others, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

....isal. 2. The law is by now well‑settled that the High Court Division of the Supreme Court has the widest and comprehensive power under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure to pass any orders or order either on an application or suo motu “to prevent abuse of the process of any Court..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 140

Abdur Gafur Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (HCD)

......opposite Party Anower Hossain................Petitioner Vs. State.......................opposite Party Judgment October 31, 1995. Result: Both the Rules are discharged and the orders of stay vacated. Case Referred to- Mohammed Ali Vs. State, 35 DLR (AD) 324. Lawyers ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 112

M/s. Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman, 3rd Labour Court and another, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)

....he learn­ed Advocate for the respondent No.2. By the impugned judgment and order dated 08.07.1985 the respondent No.1 allowed the I.R.O. case ex parte with cost of Tk. 200/- and passed the necessary orders for granting the requisite reliefs to the respondent No.2. Thereafter the petitioner obtained..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 180