Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 921-940 of 6261 results.
Superintendent (now GM), James Finlay PLC & anr Vs. Chair., 2nd Labor Court & anr, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....arty respondent obtained leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 26‑8‑1998 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 670 of 1994 making the Rule absolute and sending back the Complaint Case No. 122 of 1992 to the respondent No. 1 for fresh......ses Referred: Mohd Abdun Noor vs. Platinum Jute Mills Ltd. and another 1978 BSCR 467; Lesson vs. General Council of Medical Education and Registration 43 Chancery Division 366. Lawyers Involved: MA Mannan Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advoca..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 4 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 106
Serajuddin Ahmed & ors. Vs. AKM Saiful Alam & ors., 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....istant Commissioner of Settlement. Civil Appeal Nos. 154 and 155 of 2000 are against the judgment and order dated June 10, 1999 of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 2127 of 1994 making the Rule absolute upon declaring the order dated 29‑5‑1994 (Annexure T to the writ petition, canceli...... 34 DLR 247; Omar Faruk (Md) and others vs Government of Bangladesh and others 51 DLR 118; Hussain Baksh vs Settlement Commissioner 21 DLR (SC) 456; Chairman, BCSIR vs Abdul Khaleque 43 DLR 209. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate (Probir Neogi, Advocate with him) instructed..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 3 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 899
Abul Bashar and ors. Vs. Prafulla Kumar Das & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....J.- This petition for leave to appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated June 26, 2002 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4624 of 2000 discharging the Rule obtained against the order dated September 19, 2000 (order No. 16 dated 19‑92000) of......ners. The High Court Division as well as the assistant judge were quite correct in rejecting the prayer for stay……………………….(6) Lawyers Involved: Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md Wahidullah, Advoca..Category: Property Law | Date: 2 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 96
Smart Apparels (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Hanvit Bank Kuni Bong Branch and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ces, we direct the trial Court to dispose of the temporary injunction matter within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; Cases Referred: Uttara Bank vs. Macnell and Kilburn Ltd. 33 DLR (AD) 298; Gooryonly (BD) Textile Ltd. vs. Chartkar Information Holding Ltd 54 DLR (AD) 70. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi. Md Wahidullah,..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 2 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 783
Shah Gauhar Jamil Palash Vs. Shah Md. Mansur, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Shah Gauhar Jamil Palash......................Petitioner Vs. Shah Md. Mansur .................................Opposite Parties Judgment November 1, 2003. Result: The Rule is discharged. Cases Referred to- Shah Mohammad Vs. Haque Newaz & State, 23 DLR (......R (SC) 14; Md. Shahjahan Sheikh and others Vs. Sessions Judge, Pirojpur and others, 1986 BLD (AD) 261 = 38 DLR (AD) 246; Moslemuddin Dhali and others Vs. Helaluddin Dhali and others, 41 DLR 120. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mahsin Rashid, Advocate‑ For the Petitioner. Md. Mansur Habib with..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 1
Jashimuddin Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... directed against the impugned judgment and order dated 9‑2‑2002 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 2364 of 2002 discharging the Rule for quashing under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure the judgment and order of con......e the accused petitioner has admitted his guilt not examination under section 342 is required while convicting and sentencing the accused on the basis of the same…….(5) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on‑Record‑For the Petitione..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 26 Oct, 2003 | Hits: 79
Abul Kashem Khan Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....wan Ali J Salma Masud Chowdhury J Abul Kashem Khan……………Petitioner Vs. State………………………………Opposite Party Judgment August 27, 2003 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Harunur Rashid, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. A......Chowdhury J Abul Kashem Khan……………Petitioner Vs. State………………………………Opposite Party Judgment August 27, 2003 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Harunur Rashid, Advocate ‑ For the Petitioner. Alamgir Kabir, Assistant At..Category: Women and Children | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 157
Shamsuddin alias Shamsuddoha Vs. Mvi Amjad Ali & others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....nd order of the High Court Division dated 24‑61998 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3125 of 1997 (arising out of Criminal Revision No. 72 of 1987 and NGR Case No. 132 of 1987) making the Rule disposed of directing the first party appellants to go to Civil Court for decision about title ......bdul Jabbar vs. Azizul Huq and others 46 DLR 460; Nader Ali Sk vs. Bangladesh 1984 BLD (AD) 7; Emperor vs. Nazir Ahmed AIR 1945 Privy Council 18; Shafiqur Rahman vs. NI Chowdhury 35 DLR (AD) 127. Lawyers Involved: Khan Saifur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on‑Reco..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 414
General Manager, Bangladesh Bank Vs. Saiyed Shahidul Haque and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ement had been performed by General Manager on behalf of Bangladesh Bank. In the suit in hand General Manager of Bangladesh Bank laid the suit. Bangladesh Bank is an organ of the Government. Order 29 Rule 1 enjoins that in any suit, by or against Government the plaint or written statement shall be s...... Gangopadhyay and others, 40 C.W.N. 566; Abdul Hafez and another Vs. Lal Meah and others, 1988 BLD HCD 497; Bangshadhar Mitra and others Vs. Natabar Sardar, being Dead & others, 1 BCR HCD 393. Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed with Md. Mofizul Islam, Advocate - For the Appellant. Na..Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 35
Harunur Rashid and ors. Vs. State and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... J.- These petitions for Leave to Appeal are directed against the judgment and order dated 25‑8‑2002 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No. 121 of 2001 discharging the Rule affirming those dated 31‑10‑2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, First Cou......he penal code. The other accused participated in making such deed committed offence under section 463 of the penal code and conviction under section 467 of the penal code is proper. Lawyers Involved: Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 85
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
......................Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another…….Respondents Judgment August 23, 2003. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Bangladesh Service Rules, Rule 72(a) There was no trial of the petitioner for allegation of the offence under sect...... section 339 (c) (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the petitioner was released as the trial could not be concluded within specified time. So, he is not entitled to all arrear benefits. Lawyers involved: Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate instructed by M Khaled Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑R..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 23 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 128
DU rep. by its VC Vs. Associated Engineering & Drillers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....bsp; Md. Fazlul Karim J.- This appeal by leave is against the judgment and order dated 22‑4‑2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule in Civil Revision No. 1595 of 2000 filed by the appellant against order No. 12 dated 23‑......provides inherent power of the court whereas section 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure empowers the court to amend any defect or any error in any proceeding of the suit at any time. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Md. Zahir, Senior Advocate, (Md. Ozair Farooq, Senior Adv..Category: Civil Law | Date: 20 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 291
....at Fourth Court, Dhaka and another………………………………Respondents
Judgment
August 11, 2003.
Result:
The Rule is made absolute.
Under section 5(4) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, Artha Rin Adalat is a Ci......t and others, 55 DLR (AD) 13; Hazera Begum Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, 54 DLR 78; Sultana Jute Mills Limited Vs. Agrani Bank, 46 DLR (AD) 174; Islami Bank Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shajuddin, 52 DLR (AD) 76.
Lawyers Involved:
Md. Idrisur Rahman-For the Petitioner.
Md. Ziaul Haque-For Respondent No..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 21
Loretto represented by Nasreen Rahman, Principal Vs. Nasreen Sobhan and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
..... In the result this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the impugned judgment and decree are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 581. ....... Cases Referred to- Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan Vs. Municipal Board of Sitapur and another, AIR 1965 SC 1923; Chandra Nath Mukherjee Vs. Chulai Pashi and another, AIR 1960 (Cal) 40. Lawyers Involved: Fazlul Karim with Khandaker Aminul Huq, Advocates—For the Appellant. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 171
Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others
....Respondents. Writ Petition Nos.6372, 6481, 6735, 7916, 7984, 8275, 8296, 8297, 8316, 8333, 8334, 8335, 8422, 8438, 8551, 8327, 8351 and 8315 of 2002. Judgment MA Aziz J.- All the above Rules arose out of a common question of law as to whether under section 3(2) and section 3(3) of the......of the Supreme Court may, if necessary, be requisitioned by the government to avoid recurrence of the mistakes committed by officers making/passing the order of detention..……. (31) Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman with Khan Saifur Rahman, Advocates‑ For the Petitioners...Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 11
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
...., 2002 to the Customs Authority for releasing the goods on acceptance of the customs duty and other charges in case but of no effect. Thereupon writ petition was filed. The High Court Division issued Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause and at the time of issuing the Rule passed an a...... others………Appellants Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman and another………………………Respondents Judgment 26th July 2003 Lawyers Involved: Fida M. Kamal, Additional Attorney General, (Borhanuddin, Deputy Attor..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 26 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 128
Hossain Shially (Fakir) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 637. ......r).................... Appellant Vs. State............................. Respondent Judgment July 19, 2003. Result: The appeal is allowed. Case Referred to- 19 DLR (SC) 259. Lawyers Involved: Md. Habibur Rahman Miah, Advocate ‑ For the Accused ‑ Appellant. ABM Wal..Category: Women and Children | Date: 19 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 162
Bangladesh Vs. Rehana Kamal and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... instance of the writ‑respondent No. 2 as the appellant is directed against the judgment and order dated 9‑11‑1997 of the High Court Division passed in Writ Petition No. 1320 of 1993 making the Rule absolute declaring the inclusion of the respondent's property at Plot Nos. 537 and 538 of holdi......s. Helaluddin Ahmed 4 MLR (AD) 140; lqbal Ahmed Qurishi vs. Bangladesh 45 DLR 416; Bangladesh Vs. Professor Golam Azam 46 DLR (AD) 192; Government of Bangladesh Vs. MS Ispahani 40 DLR (AD) 116. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by Md. Ataur Rahm..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: 8 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 279
Abdul Kader Rabbani and others Vs. Ebaruddin and others, 2003,32 CLC (HCD)
....Abdul Kader Rabbani and others..................Petitioners Vs. Ebaruddin and others.................................Opposite Parties Judgment July 1, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib with Lutfunnessa Lucky, Advocates- &......rs..................Petitioners Vs. Ebaruddin and others.................................Opposite Parties Judgment July 1, 2003. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: Mansur Habib with Lutfunnessa Lucky, Advocates- For the Petitioners. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 1 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 4
Mrs. Razia Satter Vs. Mr. Azizul Huq and two others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....in this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......n-La Roche Vs. Secretary of State, (1975) AC 295; Ong Ah Chuan Vs. Public Prosecutor, (1981) AC 648; Wood Vs. Wood, (1874) LR 9 Ex. 190; 1985 Crl. L.J 359 (Bom); Marbury Vs. Madison, 2 L.Ed. 60. Lawyers Involved: Akhtar Imam with Syed Mamun Mahbub, Advocates-For Petitioner. Mahbubey A..Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2003 | Hits: 13
10411713810388951675671119848915760127887977078907314663610588988731