Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 941-960 of 4164 results.
Md. Abdul Latif Vs. Md. Harunur Rashid, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....igns to be used as bathroom fittings made of plastic. After invention he applied for registration of the same to the Controller of Patents and Designs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. He obtained registration and thereafter became the absolute owner of the said designs. S...... plaint, so long as the copyright of the plaintiff over the same remains under the law. Let the records be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) 59. ......hmudul Islam with K. Z. Huq—For the Respondent. Appeal from Criminal Order No.512 of 1981. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This Miscellaneous appeal is directed against judgment and order 31.08.1981 passed by Mr. M. I. Hossain, District Judge, Dhaka in Title Suit No.9 of 1981 f...... plaint, so long as the copyright of the plaintiff over the same remains under the law. Let the records be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 36 DLR (1984) 59. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: 6 Sep, 1983 | Hits: 223
Maqsood Alam Vs. KMJ Akbar, ComÂmodore & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....¦â€¦â€¦Petitioner Vs. K.M.J. Akbar, ComÂmodore & others……………..OppoÂsite-party Judgment May 23, 1983. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Chairman, Bangladesh Steel Mills CorpoÂration Vs. Masood Raza and others, 30 DLR (SC) 169, Government of Bang......litan Magistrate, Dhaka is quashed. Let the lower court records be sent down immediately. Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 215. ...... & others……………..OppoÂsite-party Judgment May 23, 1983. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Case Referred to- Chairman, Bangladesh Steel Mills CorpoÂration Vs. Masood Raza and others, 30 DLR (SC) 169, Government of Bangladesh Vs. A.T.J Industries, 28 DLR (AD) 120. Lawy......litan Magistrate, Dhaka is quashed. Let the lower court records be sent down immediately. Mohammad Habibur Rahman J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (HCD) (1987) 215. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 23 May, 1983 | Hits: 27
Khalilur Rahman Vs. Mr. Jamsed Ali & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....53 of 1976 and 627 of 1980. 2. In pursuance of the issuance of this contempt Rule, the Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration and Land Reforms, the Government of the Peoples' Republic of Bangladesh, Mr. Azizur Rahman, Deputy Commissioner, Rajshahi Mr. Jetendra Proshad Tanchangya, Additi......s in view of the Martial Law Regulation No.III of 1983. Accordingly, this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 298. ......;……….Contemners Judgment May 5, 1983. Result: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate with Md. Marfat Ali, Basiruddin Miah and Younus Ali, Advocates— For the Petitioners. Daliluddin Ahmed, Advocate with Akram Hos......s in view of the Martial Law Regulation No.III of 1983. Accordingly, this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 298. ..Category: Administrative Law, Civil Law | Date: 5 May, 1983 | Hits: 1
Md. Shahadat Hossain & others Vs. Kohiladdi Shaikh & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....one of the Calcutta High Court Tayefa Khatun Choudhurani Vs. Sornadhan K. Sen Rai reported in 53 (1931) Calcutta Law Journal at page 512 and another, of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Nirode Baran Vs. Devendra Mohan reported in B.C.R. 309 (AD) in support of his contention......osts. The judgment and decree of the lower appellate court are set aside and those of the trial court are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 126. ......man—For the Respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 602 of 1963. Judgment M. S. Ali J. - This appeal preferred by the plaintiff Abdul Shaikh is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.62 of the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Court, Khulna in Title Appeal......osts. The judgment and decree of the lower appellate court are set aside and those of the trial court are affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (HCD) (1985) 126. ..Category: Property Law, Tenancy Law | Date: 18 Mar, 1983 | Hits: 3
The State Vs. Mr. M.A. Wadud, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... under any circumstances. With this warning the contemner is let-off. This Rule is disposed of accordingly. 4. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to Secretary, Cabinet Division, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) ......der be forwarded to Secretary, Cabinet Division, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 95. ......shy;take is taken by the contemner, but it is difficult to accept such plea because of the fact that the act was done deliberately. There is no doubt that the contemner has shown gross disregard and utter contempt towards the order of the Sessions Judge. Since under the new dispensation of the ......der be forwarded to Secretary, Cabinet Division, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 95. ..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 9 Mar, 1983 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....ecial Original Jurisdiction) Present: FHM Habibur Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Neerala Tea Estate & others.............................Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others.............Respondents Judgment February 16, 1983. Result: ......eal to the Appellate Division. The prayer is allowed. It is certified that it is a fit case for appeal to the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 90. ...... Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others.............Respondents Judgment February 16, 1983. Result: The application is rejected. Cases Referred to- Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Salimullah, 35 DLR 1983 (AD) 1, B.C.R. 1982 (AD) 373, M/s. Bharat Board Mills Lt......eal to the Appellate Division. The prayer is allowed. It is certified that it is a fit case for appeal to the Appellate Division. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 90. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 16 Feb, 1983 | Hits: 88
The State Vs. Abdul Awal, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....g other concerns "banking company" and "a bank" was also "included within" the definition of the said words. It is undisputed that before the nationalisation of banks in Bangladesh the National Bank of Pakistan and its branches were included within the definition of the......gment be forwarded to the learned Magistrate where he is posted now. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 288. ......lip;…Accused-Respondent requires Judgment February 13, 1983. Result: The Appeal is dismissed. Whether the Nationalized Sonali Bank comes under the purview of the Shops and Establishments Act 1965 (Act No.VII of 1965) The words "commercial establishment"......gment be forwarded to the learned Magistrate where he is posted now. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 288. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 13 Feb, 1983 | Hits: 1
Shamsur Rahman Khan and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
.... Present: Abdul Matin Khan Chowdhury J Shamsur Rahman Khan and others…………………………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh……………………………&h......the learned Advocate for the petitioners. 12. In the result, the rule is discharged. However without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 284. ...... is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 284. ......the learned Advocate for the petitioners. 12. In the result, the rule is discharged. However without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 284. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 6 Feb, 1983 | Hits: 7
....3 and 65 of 1982 are allowed without any order as to costs.
(2) Order of appointment of Receiver by the High Court as affirmed by the High Court Division is set aside.
(3) All receipts from Bangladesh Water Development Board and/or its agencies will be credited in the Bank accounts, namely...... reviewed. Let a notice be issued upon the parties to show cause within two weeks as to why our judgment should not be reviewed.
Ed.
This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 203.
......te Division
(Criminal)
Present:
FKMA Munim CJ
Badrul Haider Chowdhury J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
Chowdhury ATM Masud J
Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J
Mahbubur Rahman Sikder and others................................Petitioners
Vs.
Mujibur Rahman Sikder alias M. R...... reviewed. Let a notice be issued upon the parties to show cause within two weeks as to why our judgment should not be reviewed.
Ed.
This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 203.
..
Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1983 | Hits: 132
Ramesh Chandra Barman & others Vs. Naresh Chandra Barman & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
......(7) Cases Referred to- Upendra Chandra Roy Vs. Jonab Ali, 29 DLR (Dacca) 1977 at page 229; Bandar Ali Halder Vs. Kalu Halder and others; Mohar Ali Mondal Vs. Shahabuddin Mia at page 27, 1 Bangladesh Case Report (1981). Lawyers Involved: Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate— For th......e-emption case is dismissed. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99. ......e is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99. ......e-emption case is dismissed. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 99. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 24 Nov, 1982 | Hits: 2
....82.
......dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
......p;……………………Respondent
Judgment
June 15, 1982.
Result:
These Appeals are dismissed.
Cases Referred to-
Mahomed Musa and others Vs. Aghore Kumar Ganguli and other, AIR 1914 Privy Council page 27; N. Qamar Jahan Begum ......dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
..
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... at Chittagong from the Tag Master is the Tag's agent in Singapore; (iv) Acknowledgement receipt duly signed by the plaintiffs upon receipt of the vessel in afloat condition at Chittagong in Bangladesh to be attached along with the documents required for negotiation of the letter of Credit.......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......r Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Chowdhury ATM Masud J M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd………………… Appellant Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others…………… Respondents Judgment June 9, 1982. ......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
Narendralal Chowdhury & others Vs. Bimal Kanti Chowdhury & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... that no trust was created by the will or that it was void. Mr. Halder pointed out that the amended section of section I of the Trust Act which runs as follows:- "It extends to the whole of Bangladesh. But nothing herein contained affects the rules of Muhammadan Law as to waqf, or the mutu...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ......ip;…..Respondents Judgment May 4, 1982. Result: The appeal succeeds in part. Cases Referred to- Seth Jaasumal Vs. The Central Govt. Rehabilitation Department and others, 13 DLR (SC) 111; Ram Ran Vijay Prasad Singh Vs. Province of Bhar, AIR 1942 Patna 435; Th...... regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct the parties to bear their own costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 40. ..Category: Civil Law, Property Law | Date: 4 May, 1982 | Hits: 1
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others…………………Defendants Judgment April 29, 1982. Result: The suit against defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs against defendant No.3. Case Referred to- ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....(1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. .................Plaintiff Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others…….. Defendant Judgment April 29, 1982 Result: The Petition against defendant Nos.1 and 2 is dismissed, but it is decreed with costs against defendant No. 3. Cases Referred To- ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
....Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......llip;…………. Appellants
Vs.
Messrs. Nedlloyd Lunen B.V., Rotterdam owners of Nedlloyd Lines Bremen, represented by Agents M/s. M.M. Ispahani Limited, Ispahani Building and two others………....Respondent
Judgment
April 12, 1982
Re......ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
..
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Abdul Quader Molla Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....ndatory or not could be decided upon the consequence that would follow in the event of not doing the thing by the authority. The petitioners were not Government employees under Rule 5(53) of the Bangladesh Service Rules and their pay were not paid out of the State Treasury— Under the......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ......olla...................Petitioner (In Writ Petition No.447/80) Roi Mohan Rai..........................Petitioner (In Writ Petition No.448/80) Vs. The Chairman, Bakerganj Zilla Parishad and another........Respondents is the Petitions Judgment February 11, 1982. Result: ......all and are therefore discharged without any order as to costs. Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)157 ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 1 Feb, 1982 | Hits: 1
Ragib Ali Vs. Bangladesh and ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....igh Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ......ivision (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhery J A.T. M. Afzal J Ragib Ali.......................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors……………….........Respondents Judgment Janua......e with costs to be paid as directed above. AT.M. Afzal J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 185. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 1
Salehuddin Khan Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ......Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury J A.T.M. Afzal J Salehuddin Khan..................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and ors............................Respondents Judgment January 26, 1982. Result: ......ut in the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. A.T.M. Afzal—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982)120 ..Category: Administrative Law, Employment/Service Law | Date: 26 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....hury J ATM Afzal J Neerala Tea Estate & another……………………………………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors……………………&helli......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......lip;…..Respondents Judgment January 13, 1982. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Whether the Government was within its rights to take over possession of the tea garden and other movables of the petitioners- It is petitioners' inalienable right to enjoy the pr......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
78288497937490899348429493729370712293519369709993389332922892269557955895539333