Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Hafez Abdus Salam Vs. Syed Fazlul Quader and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ......onnected Civil Rule 550(FM) of 2003 is accordingly, discharged with cost. Communicate the order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 640. ...... the Respondents. First Miscellaneous Appeal No.3 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- Defendant No.1 presented the appeal against an order dated 21‑4‑2003 passed by the District Judge at Chittagong in Miscellaneous Case No.27 of 2003, which dismissed the case as not maintainabl..Category: Civil Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 3
Rajshahi DevelopÂment Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ury, that has been suffered by the writ‑petitioner and is confined to thefacts and circumstances of this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......on. In the case of Abdul Gafur Khan and another vs. Government of Bangladesh and others reported in 42 DLR (AD) 99 which arose out of dispute regarding assessment of compensation in which the learned Judge of the High Court Division fixed the compensation taking the average of the value of the acqui..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and othÂers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......nd 3234 of 1997 rejecting the 5 revisional applications summarily. The revisional appliÂcations were filed against the judgment and order dated 10.4.1996 of the 1st Court of Additional District Judge, Sylhet, passed in Miscellaneous Appeal Nos. 76, 77, 78, 79 and 80 of 1994 allowing the same u..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ......dur Rashid J.- Defendant No.2 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an Order dated 14‑5‑03 passed by Additional District Judge. Court No.2 at Pabna in Miscellaneous Appeal No.22 of 2003, which dismissed the appeal as not ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......cordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ......upreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Awlad Ali J Mir Hashmat Ali J Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury............... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Result..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......he High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 476 of 1991 dismissing the same. The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated April 4, 1991 passed by the Court of Subordinate Judge (Arbitrator) in Arbitration Case No. 1 of 1987 making award of Taka 37,23,664.41 and thereupo..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......hey joined service on 3‑4‑83, 19‑6‑83 and 1‑9‑83. It is stated in the application that after the joining as aforesaid of all successful candidates of the 1982 batch of BCS Cadres and 1982 Special batch (as the appellants came to be known) the PSC on requisition dated 7‑12‑83 from the......actory basis for decision in the majority of cases. But there must be cases in which even his test might break down because judicial opinions also differ and an error which might be considered by one Judge as self evident might not be considered by another. The fact is that what is an error apparent..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
State Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......he incident night husband Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji killed was Hasi Begum by way of strangulation. 6. Husband Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji stood charged and stood before learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pirojpur in Sessions Case No.46 of 2000 for offence of sections 302/201 of Penal Code. 7..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 May, 2004 | Hits: 3
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ned. Judgment of the, High Court Division causing failure of justice in making the Rule absolute. Therefore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......97 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, leading to this petition, are that the leave‑petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.37 of 1994 in the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Palash, Narsingdi for permanent injunction on the averments, inter alia, that after the death..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ......order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......allowed. The trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......r 9, 1996 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3244 of 1995 making, the Rule absolute upon setting aside the order dated May 9. 1995 of the Court of 1st Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) Narsingdi, in Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 rejecting the application ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......Division Bench of the High Court Division in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 133 of 1991 allowing the same upon reversing the judgment and order dated February 20, 1990 of the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge(now Joint District Judge), Chittagong, in Miscellaneous Case No.315 of 1988 allowing the same ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ry 9, 2003 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 934 of 2001 making the Rule absolute and thereby decreeing the S.C.C. Suit No. 7 of 1993 of the Court of Senior Assistant Judge and S.C.C. Judge, Sadar, Kushtia. The Rule was obtained against the judgment and decree dated ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ...... 48 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- Defendant No.2 Executive Engineer LGED at Rangpur presented the appeal against an order dated 16‑8‑2000 passed by Second Court of Subordinate Judge at Dhaka in Title Suit No.134 of 1997, which refused to set aside the award dated 22‑6‑200..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Nurul Huq (Md) @ MN Huq Vs. Nirmal Chandra Dutta & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......ave been executed by the respondent and to decide the appeal iii accordance with law. The plaintiff of the suit shall bear the costs of the examination by the Handwriting Expert. Ed. ......ainst the judgment and decree dated 25‑62001 passed by the High Court Division in appeal from Original Decree No. 344 of 1999 allowing the appeal reversing those of the learned Subordinate Judge, First Court, Comilla in Title Suit No. 92 of 1991 dismissing the suit. 2. The pl..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 103
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellip;..................Respondents Judgment April 5, 2004. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 492 The relationship between the Special Public Prosecutor and the Government being that of a client and a lawyer and that being the......g to the provision of Article 31 of the Constitution. 14. The respondent No. 1 was appointed to conduct hearing of Session Case No. 120 of 1993 in the 3rd Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Dhaka and that later on by the letter impugned in the writ petition his appointment as Speci..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......nts Judgment April 5, 2004. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), Section 492 The government is legally authorised to terminate appointment of a Special public prosecutor out of necessity. Questioning legality of termination of such appointmen......nuddin along with another Advocate Mr. Abul Hossain Talukder was appointed Special Public Prosecutors to conduct hearing of the Sessions Case No. 120 of 1993 of the 3rd Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Dhaka. The appointment was made by the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (S..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Miscellaneous Case No. 1032 of 1996 quashing the proceedings of Special Case Nos. 3 of 1995 (Bogra), 23 of 1994 (Bogra), 22 of 1994 (Bogra), 25 of 1994 (Bogra) and 13 of 1995 (Bogra) of the Court of Divisional Special Judge, Rajshahi Division, Rajshahi. 2. Facts, in short, are that on 11‑10â€......on judgment dated December 11, 1997 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Revision Nos. 5‑8 of 1996 and Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1032 of 1996 quashing the proceedings of Special Case Nos. 3 of 1995 (Bogra), 23 of 1994 (Bogra), 22 of 1994 (Bogra), 25 of 1994 (Bogra) and ...... No. 1032 of 1996 quashing the proceedings of Special Case Nos. 3 of 1995 (Bogra), 23 of 1994 (Bogra), 22 of 1994 (Bogra), 25 of 1994 (Bogra) and 13 of 1995 (Bogra) of the Court of Divisional Special Judge, Rajshahi Division, Rajshahi. 2. Facts, in short, are that on 11‑10‑92 an Assistant In..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74