Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. Vs. Al-haj Md. Ishaque Chowdhury and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....151 of 1999 by Second Commercial Court and Subordinate Judge at Chittagong in respect of said property was forged, collusive, illegal, false, void and not binding upon the plaintiff. 48. It is not disputed that on 7-8-63 defendant No. 2 M/s Taher and Company, which was a partnership firm got, lea..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Shamsul Haque Vs. Luna Fahmida Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ngly mutated in the names of Luna and Dana. At no point of time from 1967 to 2000 when he deposed, Mokhlesur Rahman ever claimed any right or interest either over the land or the house. These are not disputed. 47. A deed of sale prepared and executed after much thought and deliberation and finall..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 139
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Kushtia Sugar Mills Ltd., 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....ive bonus as an expenditure covered by section 10(2)(XVI) of the Act inasmuch as the said expenditure was incurred by the assessee wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business and it is not disputed by the department that this expenditure is either of capital nature or personal expenses. T..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Anindra Bhusan Ghose Vs. Bangladesh Government, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....1976, dismissing the suit for declaration of title of the plaintiffs in the suit land. 2. Plaintiffs’ case, in short, is that the suit land originally belonged to Dhanobar and Nafar which is not disputed. They mortgaged the suit land to the defendant Nos.4 and 5 on 26-2-1957. But the transfer d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Titas Gas Vs. Immense Washing Plant and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e gas line is restored in no lime. 10. I have perused the revision application, orders of the Courts below and also the affidavit-in-opposition. I have heard the learned Senior Counsels. It is not disputed that the plaintiff stopped payment of the gas bills since August, 1999. Outstanding bills a..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 151
State Vs. Md. Shamim alias Shamim Sikder and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....he learned Advocates submit that this goes to suggest that the occurrence might have taken place elsewhere and in a different manner. 11. The date, time and place of occurrence are not practically disputed. 12. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the parties let u..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Abdul Mannan and another Vs. Bangladesh, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....9 of 1998 the respondents contested the Rule by filing affidavit- in-opposition denying the statements made in the writ petition and stating that the writ petition is not maintainable since it raises disputed question of fact. The writ petition has been filed with mala fide intention to hold up the ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 97
A Rouf Chowdhury and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....herein order of the RAJUK for demolition was struck down on the ground that: “no order of demolition can be passed under sub-section 5 of section 3B of the Act unless a finding is given that the disputed construction answers the description contained in clause a or b or c of sub-section 5.” ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Amirul Islam (Md.) and others Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... May 1998 without any notice. The names of petitioners No.5, 8, 9 and 11 were not included in the Monthly Pay Order for the months of February 99, September 99 and January 2000. 13. It is also not disputed that no departmental/disciplinary proceeding was ever initiated against any of the petition..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Managing Director, Dhaka WASA Vs. Meer Awlad Hossain and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....r. It is further contended that the High Court Division erred in law in failing to consider that the petitioner failed to show violation of his legal right and since the writ petition is based on disputed facts the same is not legally maintainable. It is further contended that the High Court D..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Deputy Commissioner and another Vs. Md. Abu Taher and another, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....itioner who is the original resident of village-Serpur under Police Station Bongaon, District-24 Porgona, India migrated to the then East Pakistan, exchanged his property situated in India with the disputed property in question. The deed was duly executed in the year 1964 and the same was duly aut..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Abdul Barik and another Vs. Most. Serajan Nessa and another, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... namely Serajunnessa and Noorjahan Begum. Abdul Latif is the father of the defendant and the plaintiffs are the aunt of the defendants. The plaintiffs transferred 0.29½ acre of land along with a disputed land to defendant Nos.1 and 2 against proper consideration money on 28.10.1986 and delive..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Md. Raisuddin Biswas and others Vs. Md. Mazed Ali, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....usly held that Beraful Nessa, being the plaintiff of Title Suit No.61 of 1996, should have produced Abu Sayeed as a witness inasmuch as Abu Sayeed was stranger to her and was also not involved in the disputed deed of gift in any way and accordingly Beraful Nessa was not at all required to produce Ab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Razia Sultana Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....nt on receipt of the part consideration was put in possession of the concerned premises at 28, Hatkhola Road and since then her firm continues in possession of the said premises. It also could not be disputed, the learned Advocate continued, that out of the total consideration of Taka 70,000 an amou..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 194
Saifuzzaman (Md.) Vs. State and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ing "প্রার্থনা মঞ্জুর" No counter-affidavit has been filed by the State controverting the statements made in the petitions. Learned Additional Attorney-General has not disputed the facts stated in the petitions. 6. Mrs. Tania Amir, appearing on behalf of the detenu..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Monju Mia and others Vs. Shiraj Mia and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he submits that in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court did not commit any error in rejecting the application for an expert opinion on the ground that the Court itself could compare the disputed signatures with the admitted signatures under section 73 of the Evidence Act, however risky..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61