Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 81-100 of 1593 results.
....
Ghosh Street, Armanitola , Dhaka to its owners within 4(four) months from the
date of receipt of this order of this Court.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008)
73. ...... made
absolute.
Case referred to-
Porimol Kumar Dey and others Vs. D.C.
Bakerganj and others,
19 DLR 210.
Lawyers Involved:
Shafique Ahmed with
K.M. Hafizul Alam and Mahfuzur Rahman, Advocates - For the petitioners.
Syeda Afsar Jahan, Assistant
Attorney General - For t...... of receipt of this order of this Court.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008)
73. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Petitioners
Vs.
Government of
Bangladesh, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others…………………….Respondents
Judgment
May 3, 2005.
Result:
The Rule is made
absolute.
Case referred to-
Porimol Kumar Dey and ..
Category: Property Law | Date: 3 May, 2005 | Hits: 3
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ali Akbar Ansari, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....stances, we find no substance in the submissions of learned Additional Attorney General. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 841. ......stances, we find no substance in the submissions of learned Additional Attorney General. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 841. ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka & others…………......Petitioners. Vs. Ali Akbar Ansari………...Respondent. Jud......epresented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka & others…………......Petitioners. Vs. Ali Akbar Ansari………...Respondent. Judgment April 9, 2005. Result: The review petition is dismissed. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Addit..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 93
....eing barred by limitation.
In view of the opinion expressed hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal.
Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost.
Ed.
......eing barred by limitation.
In view of the opinion expressed hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal.
Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost.
Ed.
......eing barred by limitation.
In view of the opinion expressed hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal.
Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost.
Ed.
......am J
Mr. Ismail Hussain Posshari and another…………Appellant
Vs.
District Land Acquisition Officer, Bogra and others…......Respondent
Judgment
March 28, 2005.
The Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance, 1982 (11 of..
Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 64
Bangladesh rep. by Sec., Ministry of Works Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the argument advanced by Mr. B Hossain and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is affirmed. Ed. ...... Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works........Appellant Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others ..................Respondents Judgment March 27, 2005. ......vanced by Mr. B Hossain and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is affirmed. Ed. ...... Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works........Appellant Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others ..................Respondents Judgment March 27, 2005. The Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I of 1877), Section 42 &nb..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 101
.... both the
aforesaid rules. Both the rules are therefore discharged without any order as
to costs.
Send down the L.C.R.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD)
(2007) 75.
......, through the secreÂtary, Ministry of Industries and
others, 33 DLR (AD) 30; Enemy propÂerty Management Board and others Vs. Abdul
Rashid, 27
DLR (AD) 52.
Lawyers Involved:
Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Advocate-For the Petitioner (In Civil Revision
No.2974 of 1999).
Md. Rabiul Alam Chowd...... both the
aforesaid rules. Both the rules are therefore discharged without any order as
to costs.
Send down the L.C.R.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD)
(2007) 75.
......ding, Dhaka…………………………………
Petitioner
Vs.
Mohammad Shafiqul Haque and others……………………………..Opposite
Parties
Judgment
February 23, 2005.
Result:
The rules are discharged.
Cases Referred to-
Md. Ibrahim Vs. Md. Alau..
Category: Property Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 5
Govt. of BD rep. by the Sec., Min. of Establishment Vs. Md. Abu Bakar, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...........Petitioners Vs. Md. Abu Dakar and others... ..................Respondents Judgment February 16th, 2005. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 102 & 103 The respondent brought the writ petition for getting allotment of a Government pl...... Ministry of Works, Housing and Settlement and ors................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abu Dakar and others... ..................Respondents Judgment February 16th, 2005. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Articles 102 & 103 The respondent brou..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 69
Chairman, Sherpur Paurashava Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain Chowdhury, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....-retainable khas land of the original landlord, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......-retainable khas land of the original landlord, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......o not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......hury J Chairman, Sherpur Paurashava……….. Petitioner Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain Chowdhury.........Respondents Judgment February 1, 2005. The State Acquisition & Tenancy Act, 1950(XXVIII of 1951), ..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 118
SMAH Ltd SMAH Ltd Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....time of issuance of this Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 267. ......Ramzan Ali Sikder, Advocates‑ For the Petitioner. Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed with KZ Alam, Advocates- For Respondent No.8. Dr. Naim Ahmed Advocate- For Respondent No.9. ANM Musfiqur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General‑For the Respondent No.2. Writ Petition No.4433 of 2003. ......ferred to- Director of Housing and Settlement, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka Vs. Abdul Majid Howlader and others, 1 LG (AD) 64=9BLC (AD) 51; Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of LA & LR and others Vs. Commercial Trust of Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 1994 BLD (AD) 72=46 DLR (AD)...... ..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 7
Arshed Ali Sikder (Md.) Vs. Gouranga Chandra Shil and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... stands vacated. Send down the lower Court's record and a copy of the judgment and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 635. ......nt into evidence, the question of its admissibility cannot be raised at a subsequent stage……….........(8) Cases Referred to- Nawab Ali Dhakua and others Vs. Abdur Rahman, 1994 BLD (AD) 229; Sova Rani Guha Vs. Abdul Awal Mia and others, 47 DLR (AD) 45; Abul Kashem......also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 635. ......lip;Petitioner Vs. Gouranga Chandra Shil and others……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment January 10, 2005. Result: The Rule is discharged. Rules or procedures are made to subserve the ends ..Category: Property Law | Date: 10 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 2
Mahadeb Chandra Mondal and other Vs. Dulal Chandra Mondal and other, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and Title Suit No. 174 of 1975 of the Court of Munsif, Second Court, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and Title Suit No. 174 of 1975 of the Court of Munsif, Second Court, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......lowed without any order as to costs and Title Suit No. 174 of 1975 of the Court of Munsif, Second Court, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......rim J MA Aziz J Mahadeb Chandra Mondal and other.........Appellants Vs. Dulal Chandra Mondal and other..............Respondents Judgment January 4, 2005. The State Acquisition & Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), Section 95 and 95A ..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 137
Biseruddin Sarder (Md) and others Vs. Md. Tofazzal Hossain Biswas and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e view that the High Court Division acted illegally in interfering with the findings and decision of the Court of appeal. The appeal is, therefore, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e view that the High Court Division acted illegally in interfering with the findings and decision of the Court of appeal. The appeal is, therefore, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......al is, therefore, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......took loan of Taka 71 on 12th Ashar, 1336 BS and another sum of Taka 92 in 1337 BS from Tayebuddin Biswas, the predecessor of the defendants. Saku Sarder executed a loan document for Taka 152 on l3th Jaishtha 1340 BS and Hossain Sarder executed another loan document on 15 Ashar ..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 21
Most. Shilu Begum Vs. Md. Roshan Akter Rahman, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....are of the petitioner which she is entitled to get according to municipal law. Lower Court's record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 48. ...... Lower Court's record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 48. ......¦¬à¦¾à¦¦à§€ শিলৠবেগমের পà§à¦°à¦¤à¦¿ ২৫/২/৯১ইং তারিখে জারি করিয়া পà§à¦°à¦¤à¦¿à¦¬à§‡à¦¦à¦¨ দাখিল করিয়াছি। In cross he stated that- যার পà§à¦°à¦¤à¦¿ নোটিশ জারী করিয়à¦...... Rahman………………………Opposite Party. Judgment December 7, 2004. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases referred to- Most. Johara Begum Vs. Rafiqul Kader, 25 DLR (HC) 91; Abdur Rashid and another Vs. Abdul Barik and another, 35 DLR (AD) 162; Shari Ullah Pa..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 88
....n view of the discussions made above we do not find any substance in this petition.
The leave petition, accordingly, is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 10 BLC (AD) (2005) 39.
......n view of the discussions made above we do not find any substance in this petition.
The leave petition, accordingly, is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 10 BLC (AD) (2005) 39.
......n view of the discussions made above we do not find any substance in this petition.
The leave petition, accordingly, is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 10 BLC (AD) (2005) 39.
......etary, Ministry of Works, Government of Bangladesh, the writ respondent, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 17.06.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 365 of 1993, making the rule absolutely.
2. The writ petitioner-respondent No. 1 claiming to be pu..
Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 82
Ashraful Alam Vs. Md. Moniruddin and ors, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....gment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 260. ...... possess they brought 3/2 people (uncle, brother). They were Sultan, Humayun and Panir (none of them examined). He along with brothers Minar Uddin, Naziruddin and everyone of the house except Mizanur Rahman were present. There was a shop under the name Kaniza in the four-roof hut that belonged to de......n into adverse possession. Cf: Thakur Kishan Singh (dead) Vs. Arvind Kumar; 1994(6) SCC 591. Here, in this case, possession of the plaintiffs in the suit shops cannot be termed as adverse....(34 & 35) Case Referred to- Cf: Thakur Kishan Singh (dead) Vs. Arvind Kumar; 1994(6) SCC 5...... the knowledge of real owner. Mere possession for a long time does not result in converting permissive possession into adverse possession. Cf: Thakur Kishan Singh (dead) Vs. Arvind Kumar; 1994(6) SCC 591. Here, in this case, possession of the plaintiffs in the suit shops cannot be termed as adv..Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Aug, 2004 | Hits: 2
Nurul Haque (Md.) Vs. Anowara Begum and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....t No.5 of 1985 is hereby upheld. Send down the lower Court's Record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 702. ......t equal possession…………..(29) Cases Referred to- Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 44 DLR (AD) 147; Abdus Sattar Vs. Abdul Rahman and others, 44 DLR (AD) 100; Radhamoni Debi Vs. Collector and others, 27 Indian Appeals 136; ......005) 702. ......for the full period of 12 years. If the adverse dispossession discontinued, for however short a time before he completes his title, his previous possession, loses its value………..(25) All adverse claims by law are subject to limitation…………(26) ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 2
Rajdhani Unnayan KartiÂpakhya (RAJUK) Vs. Jahanara Begum & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....UK would make allotment to the writ petitioner, otherwise not. The direction of the High Court Division is modified as above. The petition is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......UK would make allotment to the writ petitioner, otherwise not. The direction of the High Court Division is modified as above. The petition is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......UK would make allotment to the writ petitioner, otherwise not. The direction of the High Court Division is modified as above. The petition is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:......acquisition made by the RAJUK. It was also the case of the writ petitioner that Government acquired the land, which he has purchased in August 1994, by starting LA Case Nos. 138 of 1961‑62, 91 of 1957‑58 and 26 of 1959‑60 for the establishment of Residential Model Town and for making the acqui..Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 133
Zamini Bala Das Vs. Abdul Aziz and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....f the trial Court restored. The suit is decreed as prayed for. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 774. ......f the trial Court restored. The suit is decreed as prayed for. Send down the record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 774. ......Begum Vs. Murad Begum, PLD 1975 SC 624; Abdul Jalil Munshi and another Vs. Abu Baker Siddique, 35 DLR (AD) 42; Babul Kanti Das Vs. Abul Hasem and ors, 47 DLR (AD) 6; Md. Abdul Nasir and ors Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh and another, 28 DLR 392. Lawyers involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiy......hers.................................Opposite Parties Judgment July 17, 2004. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Hamida Begum Vs. Murad Begum, PLD 1975 SC 624; Abdul Jalil Munshi and another Vs. Abu Baker Siddique, 35 DLR (AD) 42; Babul Kanti Das Vs...Category: Property Law | Date: 17 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 4
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and othÂers, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on of the land transferred by the heir of Abdul Ghani to the pre-emptees. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed There is no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......t of Bangladesh Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah.......... Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and othÂers................ Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1998) Pervejur Rahman an......Order Nos. 3230, 3231, 3232, 3233 and 3234 of 1997 rejecting the 5 revisional applications summarily. The revisional appliÂcations were filed against the judgment and order dated 10.4.1996 of the 1st Court of Additional District Judge, Sylhet, passed in Miscellaneous Appeal Nos. 76, 77, 78, 79...... J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah.......... Appellant (In all the appeals) Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and othÂers................ Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 85 of 1998) Pervejur Rahman and othÂers.............. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 86 of 1998) ..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......t of Bangladesh, represented by Deputy Commissioner…….Appellant Vs. Anwara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment May 25, 2004. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), Sections 3(a), 23 & 24 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
....allowed.
The trial Court is directed to proceed with
the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously.
There is no order as to costs.
Ed.
......allowed.
The trial Court is directed to proceed with
the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously.
There is no order as to costs.
Ed.
......irected to proceed with
the trial of Title Suit No. 4 of 1995 and to dispose of the same expeditiously.
There is no order as to costs.
Ed.
......
Not represented - The Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1997.
(From the judgment and order dated December
9, 1996 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3244 of 1995).
Judgment
&nbs..
Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
866130031275868599858885899987728312292888390307190433098151161