Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 981-1000 of 6409 results.

Alfazuddin Ahmed Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

....ection 24 of the non-agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949) against the judgment and order dated July 2 1, 1991 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 523 of 1985 discharging the Rule and consequent thereupon affirming the judgment and order dated July 22, 1985 of the 3rd Court ......emption case is dismissed. There is no order as to costs.   Ed.   This Case is also Reported in:  55 DLR (AD) (2003) 108.  ..

Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 81

Govt. of BD, rep. by the Sec., Min. of Defence & ors. Vs. Md. Afzal Hossain Ansari, 2003, 32 CLC (AD

.... January 8, 2003.   The Administrative Tribunal Act, 1981 (VII of 1981) Section 4   The Government Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1985 Rule 4   Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunal Act vested the Tri......peal.   Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.   Ed.  This Case is also Reported in:  55 DLR (AD) (2003) 65.  ..

Category: Administrative Law | Date: 8 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 122

Pannu Mollah & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....            Syed JR Mudassir Husain J.- This Appeal, by way of leave, is from the judgment and order dated 29‑6‑2000 discharging the Rule in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1838 of 2000 in refusing to quash the conviction of the peti......ssed in Special Tribunal Case No. 100 of 1996 is quashed insofar as the same relates to the appellants. The appellants are set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 84

Securities and Exchange Commission Vs. Abu Tyeb and 10 ors. 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

.... and 1856 of 1999 and Criminal Revision No. 2001 of 1999 under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In Criminal Revisional No. 293 of 1999 and Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 359 of 1999 Rules were made absolute whereas in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1856 of 1999 and Criminal Revis......9 and Criminal Revision No. 2001 of 1999 under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In Criminal Revisional No. 293 of 1999 and Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 359 of 1999 Rules were made absolute whereas in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 1856 of 1999 and Criminal Revision No. 2001 of..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Dec, 2002 | Hits: 76

Captain (Rtd.) Nurul Huda Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

.... of which such a discretion can be judicially exercised, for, rarely will there be two cases in which the facts are alike ....”     “To act upon a Rule of practice may, therefore, well constitute an arbitrary exercise of a discretionary power, f......ed in connection with any other case. In the result this appeal is allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691.   ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Dec, 2002 | Hits: 123

Zyta Garments Ltd. Vs. Union Bank Ltd. and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

....er to be added as a party on the ground that if it was made a party it would create unnecessary complications in the disposal of the suit. 4. Being aggrieved the Petitioner obtained a Rule in civil revisional jurisdiction of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4925 of 2000......ary and proper party to be added in the suit and find no illegality or infirmity in its judgement calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 19 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 169

Tarak Chandra Majhi Vs. Atahar Ali Howlader and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)

..... Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by the plaintiff by leave is against the judgment and order dated July 23, 1999 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2118 of 1993 making the Rule absolute upon reversing the judgment and decree dated Octo­ber 28, 1992 of the Court of Subord......ul Amin J.- This appeal by the plaintiff by leave is against the judgment and order dated July 23, 1999 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2118 of 1993 making the Rule absolute upon reversing the judgment and decree dated Octo­ber 28, 1992 of the Court of Subordinate..

Category: Evidence Law | Date: 18 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 74

Asalat Zaman (Md) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

....t/Track, Bangladesh Railway. The arbitrator gave his award on 16 January, 1991 and submitting the same before the Subordinate Judge the contractor thereupon made an application for making the award a Rule of the Court. But the Chief Engineer, West, Rajshahi and Divisional Engineer, Bangladesh Railwa......as aforesaid with interest at the bank rate till realisation.   Ed.   This Case is also Reported in:  55 DLR (AD) (2003) 139.  ..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 17 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 223

DC of Dhaka & ors Vs. Aziz Co­operative Housing Society Ltd. & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)

....nbsp; 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated March 13, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5539 of 2000 making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon has declared the notice dated October 23, 2000 issued under s...... 2. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated March 13, 2002 of a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 5539 of 2000 making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon has declared the notice dated October 23, 2000 issued under sectio..

Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 72

Chair, Board of Inter. & Secn. Edn., Jessore and ors. Vs. Md. Amir Hossain & anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....nbsp;       Md. Faziul Karim J.‑ The Writ respondent-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division making the Rule absolute declaring the impugned order passed by the petitioner No. 2 vide Memo No. Prasha/10/P&......       Md. Faziul Karim J.‑ The Writ respondent-petitioners seek leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division making the Rule absolute declaring the impugned order passed by the petitioner No. 2 vide Memo No. Prasha/10/P‑..

Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 12 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 322

Taiyaba Zaman Vs. Gias Uddin Ahmed and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....an.............................................Petitioner Vs. Gias Uddin Ahmed and others.........................Opposite Parties Judgment November 6, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Kumar Begum Roy Vs. Panna Debi and others, 1982 ........................................Petitioner Vs. Gias Uddin Ahmed and others.........................Opposite Parties Judgment November 6, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Kumar Begum Roy Vs. Panna Debi and others, 1982 BLD (AD) 54; ..

Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 6 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 198

Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. MA Khair Bhuiyan, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

.... Division/Chairman, NBR nor by any high ranking authorised officer but by the filing lawyer Mr Matiur Rahman Shah, Advocate himself has made the application without any verification as required under Rule 3(5) of Administrative Tribunal Rules 1982 and, as such, the said petition for restoration of t......e appeal in accordance with law. In the result, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:  55 DLR (AD) (2003) 76. ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 4 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 152

Hashibul Bashar Vs. Gulzar Rahman and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)

....for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment and order of July 13 of 1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 7342 of 1998 discharging the Rule.  2. The Rule, upon an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Proce......tiable Instruments Act.  10. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no substance in the petition.  Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 28 Oct, 2002 | Hits: 326

Ekushey Television & anr. Vs. Dr. Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan & ors. 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

....tional interest, have acted in breach of law and the policy formulated by the government and against the-national interest.  11. Upon hearing the parties, the High Court Division made the Rule absolute on the finding that the Evaluation Report was changed, by which the disqualified parti......l interest, have acted in breach of law and the policy formulated by the government and against the-national interest.  11. Upon hearing the parties, the High Court Division made the Rule absolute on the finding that the Evaluation Report was changed, by which the disqualified participan..

Category: Procedural Law | Date: 29 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 190

Maico Jute and Bag Corporation Vs. Bangladesh Jute Mills Corporation & others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)

....sion in Civil Revision No. 156 of 2002) Judgment Mohammad Fazlul Karim J.- The plaintiff-petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the impugned judgment of the High Court Division making the Rule absolute staying all further proceeding of Money Suit No. 31 of 2001 pending in the 5th Court o......ration and others....................Respondents Judgement August 20, 2002. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Arbitration Act, 2001 (Act No. I of 2001), Section 10 It is absolutely the domain and the discretion of the court to grant the relief sought for or to grant any..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 20 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 280

Bux Shipping Line Vs. Bangladesh Water Development Board & others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)

....d the Umpire made the award for the amount as mentioned hereinabove with interest. 4. The plaintiff petitioner took the award to the court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka for mak­ing the same Rule of the Court and the learned Subordinate Judge made the award rule of the Court for the awarde......alization thereof. The review peti­tion has no merit. Accordingly the same is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 ADC (2004) 476...

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: 18 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 217

Antibiotic Stores & ors Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & anr., 2003, 32 CLC (AD).

....sp;          Md. Fazlul Karim, J.- The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division discharging the Rule as not maintainable as the remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure is available in the executi......matter we do n any substance in the submission of the Counsel for petitioners for our interference impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed.  Ed. ..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 12 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 121

Abdus Sobhan Biswas Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 556. ......Send down the LC records along with a copy of this judgment to the trial Court concerned immediately for information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 556. ..

Category: Women and Children | Date: 11 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 77

Zilaluddin (Md.) Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)

....lip;………..Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others…………Respondents  Judgment July 29, 2002 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M Amir-ul Islam, Tania Amir, Dr. Shirin......hellip;…..Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others…………Respondents  Judgment July 29, 2002 Result: The Rule is made absolute. Lawyers Involved: M Amir-ul Islam, Tania Amir, Dr. Shirin Sharmin Chow..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 2

Shishir Kanti Pal and others Vs. Nur Muhammad and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)

....hul Amin J.- This petition for leave to appeal is against the judgment and order of July 10, 2001 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 110 of 1994 discharging the Rule. The civil revision was filed against the judgment and decree of 31st October, 1993 of the Co......came in the then East Pakistan in the month of February 1971 from Agartala in the State of Tripura, India upon obtaining a Pakistani Passport. The trial Court has also observed "the plaintiffs have absolutely failed to sustain the alleged contention of making any exchange of the schedule Propert..

Category: Civil Law | Date: 27 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 175