Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 1001-1020 of 6822 results.
ACI Ltd Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... by 23 August 2004 positively. 16. Parties will maintain status quo as of today till then. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 335. ...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J SAB Mahmudul Huq J ACI Ltd..........................................Petitioner Vs. Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another.........Opposite Parties Judgment June 2..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 1
....ot find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:56 DLR (AD) 166.
......ot find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:56 DLR (AD) 166.
......ot find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:56 DLR (AD) 166.
......
Md. Ruhul Amin J
MM Ruhul Amin J
Md. Tafazzal Islam J
Unicol Bangladesh Blocks Thirteen and Fourteen (formerly named Occidental of Bangladesh) and another ..................Petitioners
Vs.
Maxwell Engineering Works Ltd and another...............Respondents
Judgment
June..
Category: Civil Law | Date: 21 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 321
Abdul Gaffar Chowdhury Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... view, not maintainable. The Rule is accordingly, discharged with cost. The order of stay granted by this Court earlier stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 138. ....... Petitioner Vs. Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat & others..........Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Azmalul Hossain, QC with Reba Kaniz, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Morshed Ahmed Khan with ASM Abdur R..............Respondents Judgment June 14, 2004. Results: The Rule is discharged. Lawyers Involved: Azmalul Hossain, QC with Reba Kaniz, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Morshed Ahmed Khan with ASM Abdur Razzaque, Advocates—For Respondent No. 2. Writ Petition No. 4339 of 2002. ......57 DLR (2005) 138. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 14 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 310
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......s to be assessed both for the movable and immovable properties……..(5) Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney‑General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on‑Record‑For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate&......rator has not committed any error of law. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we do not find any merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by Deputy Commissioner…….Appellant Vs. Anwara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
AHM Mustain Billah & others Vs. Bangladesh, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....aid appeal was heard and dismissed on merit, the Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 826 of 1998 shall also stand dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: .......(30). Cases referred to- Nowabzada Muhammad Amir Khan vs. Controller of Estate Duty, Government of Pakistan, Karachi and another 14 DLR SC 276; Akbar Ali vs. Iftekhar PLD 1949 PC 339; Mazdar Hossain vs. Ministry of Finance 7 BLC (AD) 92, 43 DLR (AD) 12; Sow Chandra Kanta and another vs. She......or apparent on the face of the record or no provision of law was left unnoticed in the impugned judgement there is no scope of review……….(30). Cases referred to- Nowabzada Muhammad Amir Khan vs. Controller of Estate Duty, Government of Pakistan, Karachi and another 14 DLR SC 276; Akbar...... Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J AHM Mustain Billah & others…………. Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others ...........R..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 23 May, 2004 | Hits: 128
State Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ......Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji…………Convict (in abscondence) Judgment May 18, 20......lice, Dhaka. iv. Superintendent of Police, Pirojpur. Lower Court's Record be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 264. ...... Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Faraji…………Convict (in abscondence) Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 18 May, 2004 | Hits: 3
....he Bankruptcy Court is directed to dispose of the bankruptcy case expeditiously.
The order of stay granted earlier by this Court
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 716.
......he Bankruptcy Court is directed to dispose of the bankruptcy case expeditiously.
The order of stay granted earlier by this Court
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 716.
......he Bankruptcy Court is directed to dispose of the bankruptcy case expeditiously.
The order of stay granted earlier by this Court
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 716.
......din Chowdhury J
National Oxygen Limited and others…………………………………………Petitioners
Vs.
Additional District Judge and Bankruptcy Court, Chittagong and another……&hell..
Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 10 May, 2004 | Hits: 9
Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ......p;……………………….Respondents Judgment May 5, 2004. Result: The appeal is allowed. Lawyers Involved: Md. Moazzam Hossain with Md. Hasmatullah Sheikh, Advocates‑ For the Appellant. Gazi Md. Neamat Hossain, A...... observations made hereinbefore. The impugned order passed by the Registrar of Trade Marks is set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 565. ...... Md. Abdul Hafiz J Asadul Hoque, Trading as Samrat Shoe………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks & another………………&hell..Category: Others | Date: 5 May, 2004 | Hits: 4
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e granted the relief prayed for. 28. In the background of the discussions made herein before we find merit in the appeals. Accordingly the appeals are allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Zahurul Islam Chowdhury and another, 35 DLR (AD) 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Basharat Ali and others, 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubu......ji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Basharat Ali and others, 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A. S. M Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-.............Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali and others Vs. Rakhal Chandra Mondal a..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......(Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Deputy, Attorney‑ General with him), instructed by Mvi Md. Wahididlah, Advocate‑on‑Record-For the Petitioners. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Amir Hossain Chowdhury Advocate‑on‑ Record‑ For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to App......on was not authorized in law to pass any relief while disposing of an application under article 102 of the Constitution. ………………..(9 & 10) Cases Referred to- Md. Amir Khan vs. Controller of Estate Duty PLD 1961 SC 119 = 13 DLR (SC) 105; Kumudini Welfare Trust vs. Pro...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: SJR Mudassir Husain J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh Bank and others......Appellants Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin , J. M.M. Ruhul Amin , J. Md. Tafazzul Islam, J. Abdul Jabber alias Lalim........Petitioner. Vs. Md. Lokman Hossain being dead his legal heirs and Md. Abdul Latif and others. ................................. the High Court Division in making the Rule absolute. 12. In the background of the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in the petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......issed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......d dated 22‑6-2000 is accordingly set aside. The arbitration agreement now ceases to have any effect. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......rt High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Siddiqur Rahman Miah J Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur................Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment A..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......lved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. Abdus Salam Khan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 288 of 2001. ......: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment April 6, 2...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Ananda Builders Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Inland Water Transport Authority and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ...... Court Division do not call for any interference. In the result the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 31. ......1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 215
Sec. Min. of Law, Justice & Par. Affairs & ors. Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ris Khan, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 2, 16 & 18‑32. ...... Involved: Syed Abu Kowser and Md. Dabirush Shan, Deputy Attorneys‑General, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellants. ldris Khan, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate‑o......p; Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others .......Appellants Vs. Md. Borhan Uddin and others……..................Respondents Ju..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 201
SM Jillur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 9. In view of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. The appeal, accordingly, is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Mujibur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Appellant. Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For Respondent Nos. 3‑31. Not repre......egality of such action……………………(8) Lawyers Involved: Md. Mujibur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate‑on‑ Record‑For the Appellant. Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate,......nbsp; Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J SM Jillur Rahman ..............Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others .......................Respondents Judgment A..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 5 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 259
Shakawat Hassan Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ...... ...... This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 244. ......gh Court Division (Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Khademul Islam Chowdhury J Afzal Hossain Ahmed J Shakawat Hassan.................................Petitioner Vs. State.................................................Opposite Party Judgment &nb..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 4 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 1
Alauddin Sikder (Md) & anr. Vs. BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....p; The petitioners are directed to pay cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) each and pay the amount to the college fund within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ......p; The petitioners are directed to pay cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) each and pay the amount to the college fund within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ......p; The petitioners are directed to pay cost of Taka 5,000 (five thousand) each and pay the amount to the college fund within one month from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. ...... J Alauddin Sikder (Md) and another……………Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh and others ....…….............Respondents Judgment..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 31 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 213
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Mridha & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....on in quashing the proceedings of the special cases. 32. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find merit in all these appeals. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed. Ed. ......DLR (SC) 439; MS Khawaja vs. State 17 DLR (SC) 153; Azhar Ali Khan and others vs. State 1985 BLD (AD) 75; Abdul Wadud Sikder vs. State 30 DLR 237; Maklesur Rahman vs. State 35 DLR 72 and Md. Mosharaf Hossain and others vs. State 1990 BLD I 10 = 42 DLR 213. Md Abul Hossain vs. State, 1999 BLD (AD) 97......DLR (AD) 69; Md. Shafiqullah vs State 33 DLR 297 = 1981 BLD 119; Salimuddin Ahmed vs. State 32 DLR (AD) 103; Ghulam Muhammad vs. State 19 DLR (SC) 439; MS Khawaja vs. State 17 DLR (SC) 153; Azhar Ali Khan and others vs. State 1985 BLD (AD) 75; Abdul Wadud Sikder vs. State 30 DLR 237; Maklesur Rahman......lowed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 30 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 74
Monajjel Hossain Khan Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......ion (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim M A Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Monajjel Hossain Khan alias Mintoo.......................Petitioner vs State, Represented by the DC.......riminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim M A Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Monajjel Hossain Khan alias Mintoo.......................Petitioner vs State, Represented by the DC...............revisional application the High Court Division has not, in any way, committed any illegality warranting interference by this Court. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 92
890914559501516288849032893522611473209024137591361348878135132280