Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Professor Dr. Niaz Zaman Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....e-C annexed thereto do form part of this order. With the above observation and the aforesaid directions this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 101. ......CD) 117 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Amir Hossain Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. A. F. Hassan Ariff, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 588 o......e-C annexed thereto do form part of this order. With the above observation and the aforesaid directions this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 101. ...... Vs. Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakhya and others..........Respondents Judgment March 24, 2003. Result: The petition is dismissed. Cases Referred To- 1991 SC 1902; 17 BLD (AD) 1; 15 BLD (HCD) 117 Lawyers Involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Senior Advocate, instructed by Amir Hossain Ch..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Quazi Md. Obaidur Rashid and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....also found nothing to interfere with. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed after condoning delay of 23 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 39. ......also found nothing to interfere with. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed after condoning delay of 23 days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 6 LG (AD) (2009) 39. ...... K. M. Hasan CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Hamidul Haque J Government of Bangladesh and others..........Petitioners Vs. Quazi Md. Obaidur Rashid and others……………….Respondents Judgment August 13, 2003.......cord- For the Petitioners. Abdur Rob Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent Nos. 1-7. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 524 of 2002. (From the Judgment and Order dated 10-12-2001 passed by the High Court Divisio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Elahi Mondal Vs. Juran Mondal and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... there being no illegality or infirmity in the above decision no interference is called for. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 135. ......hatun who is possessing the same through defendant No.1, her bargadar and that Rahela Khatun by an agreement transfer schedules Ka and Kha land to the defendant No.1 and also one Latifur Rahman, her relation, but having not executed the sale deed the defendant No.1 and said Latifur Rah......ivision (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Elahi Mondal……………………Petitioner Vs. Juran M......ahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1 Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 697 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 25.1.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3380 of 2000) Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Mohammad Akbar Chowdhury Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....le and affirmed the judgment of the appellate court. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 130. ...... (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Mohammad Akbar Chowdhury….............Petitioner Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others ................Respondents Judgment January 29, 2009. Lawye...... 130. ......oner (Appeared with the leave of the Court). Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1393 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 28.11.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.6562 of 2001.) Judgment &nbs..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Ahmed Safa Vs. Amin Sharif and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....be an issue and does not deserve to be decided here. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 125. ...... Judgment December 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nandy, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1-3. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 4-2......his Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 125. ......tin J Ahmed Safa……………….... Petitioner Vs. Amin Sharif and others……............Respondents Judgment December 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Harendra Nath Nandy, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Tazimuddin and others Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ew of the judgment passed by this Court. We find no merit in this review petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 117. ...... Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others ......Respondents Judgment October 20, 2008. Lawyers Involved: Md. Awlad Ali, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civi...... (Civil) Present: M.M. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Tazimuddin and others……………Petitioners Vs. Md. Mafizul Islam and others ......y Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondents. Civil Review Petition No. 122 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 29.05.2008 passed by this Division in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.1642 of 2007. Judgme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Narryan Chandra Das Vs. Sree Joydeb Datta and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... cost of Tk. 20,000/- as directed by the High Court Division. With this modification as to cost this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 110. ...... cost of Tk. 20,000/- as directed by the High Court Division. With this modification as to cost this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 110. ...... is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 110. ...... Involved: Abul Kalam Mainuddin, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.753 of 2006. (From the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2005 passed by the High Court Divisio..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Abdul Khaleque Vs. Abdul Noor and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....rit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 75; 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 63. ......p;………......Appellant Vs. Abdul Noor and others………Respondents Judgment July 26, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-record- For the Petitioner ......D (AD) 2006, 63. ......d. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Khaleque…………......Appellant Vs. Abdul Noor and others………Respondents Judgment July 26, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahma..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Mrs. Rawshan Ara Begum and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... in our opinion is of no merit. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find merit in the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 65. ......of Settlement and others 48 DLR (AD), 61. Lawyers Involved: A.J. Mohammad Ali, Attorney General, instructed by Wahidullah, Advocate-on-record- For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Serajur Rahman Advocate-on-record- For Respondent No.1. ......d in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009) 65. ...... J M.A. Aziz J Government of Bangladesh and another….....Appellants Vs. Mrs. Rawshan Ara Begum and another.............Respondents Judgment May14, 2005. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jalil and others 48 DLR (AD) 10; Hazerullah..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
M/S. S. Rahman & Company Limited and another Vs. UCBL and ors., 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ightly corrected by the High Court Division. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 17 BLT (AD) (2009)51. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/S. S. Rahman & Company Limited and another…..Petitioner Vs. The United Commerci......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/S. S. Rahman & Company Limited and another…..Petitioner Vs. The United Commercial Bank...... 4. The writ petitioner respondent filed Mortgage Suit No.33 of 1991 in the Court of learned1st Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong against the petitioner and others for realization of Tk.73,63,612.50 which was subsequently made an amount of Tk.67,90,120.06 as per banks subsequent account statem..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Sheikh Abul Hossain and others Vs. Khulna Development Authority , 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....to allow or reject the application of the petitioner. We find no merit in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 79. ......ning to present plot No.18.42 (former 1787) within Mouza Chhoto-Boyra, P.S. Sonadanga, District-Khulna belongs to late Parash Ullah, Yunus Sheikh, Nasaruddin Sheikh and plaintiff No.8 Sheikh Abdur Rahman was recorded in khatian No. 849 in the District Survey and 862 in S.A. Survey. Out of the ab......eported in: VI ADC (2009) 79. ...... Khulna Development Authority represented by its Chairman, Upper Jessore Road, K.D.A. Building, Khulna and others……............Respondents Judgment December 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahid..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Mostafa Kamal Vs. Md. Nasir Ahmed and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the above, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 54. ......ant Vs. Md. Nasir Ahmed and others. ......Respondents Judgment May 27, 2008. Case Referred To- 31 DLR (AD) 320. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate instructed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. ......Nasir Ahmed and others. ......Respondents Judgment May 27, 2008. Case Referred To- 31 DLR (AD) 320. Lawyers Involved: Md. Khalilur Rahman, Advocate instruct­ed by A.S.M. Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Abdus Salam Khan, Se......judgment and decree dated 14.02.1999 of the District Judge, Bhola in Title Appeal No.66 of 1998 reversing those dated 28.07.1998 of the Assistant Judge, Borhanuddin Upazila Bhola, in Title Suit No.53 of 1994 decreeing the suit. 2. The facts of the case, in short, are that the plainti..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Major (Rtd) Quazi Hasna Hena Begum Vs. Lt. Col. Kazi Mansurul Islam and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....l of waiver and acquiescence as well. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VI ADC (2009) 29, 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 255. ......n Ameen J Major (Rtd) Quazi Hasna Hena Begum........Appellant Vs. Lt. Col. Kazi Mansurul Islam and others .........Respondents Judgment April 6, 2008. Case Referred To- Akhlasur Rahman and others vs Safarullah and others 42 DLR (AD) 189. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmu......not create better title or any vested right in favour of the appellant; that the registered lease deed cannot remain valid in law if found by a competent Court; that the office of the 'Q.M.G.' and 'M & Q' Department, Dhaka Cantonment issued Memo dated 22.06.1994 requesting the petitioner to send his......gladesh Army he applied for allotment of a plot in Johar-sahara residential project on 10.12.1991. Thereafter, at his request he was allotted an alternative Plot No. 281/C at Mohakhali D.O.H.S on 23.05.1993. Vacant possession was delivered and lease deed was executed on 10.06.1993. He applied for ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 74
M/s. Molla industrial Estate Vs. Khawja Mohammad Arifullah & others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....hem. In view of the forgoing discussions the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 99. ......hem. In view of the forgoing discussions the appeals are allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 99. ...... MM Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s. Molla industrial Estate……………Appellant (In Civil Appeal Nos.135-136 of 2000) Governme......afazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s. Molla industrial Estate……………Appellant (In Civil Appeal Nos.135-136 of 2000) Government of Bangladesh & others……Appellants (In Civil Appeal ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Janata Bank Vs. Rezwanul Haque and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 996. ......ead of the said respondents as they have three-storied residential building thereon. The said respondents have no other homestead than the property in question. But the respondent No.6 Md. Khalilur Rahman fraudulently mortgaged the said property by way of security against the loan obtained by him...... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Janata Bank...................Petitioner Vs. Rezwanul Haque and others….....Respondents Judgment November 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: S...... Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Janata Bank...................Petitioner Vs. Rezwanul Haque and others….....Respondents Judgment November 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Abu Siddique,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 19
Misbah Abedin Vs. Muzmmil Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... no substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 970. ........... Respondents Judgment November15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate with Abdul Quiyum, Probir Neogi, Advocates instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with A.K.M. Ali, A......arim J Md.Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Misbah Abedin..........Petitioner Vs. Muzmmil Ali and others…...... Respondents Judgment November15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: ...... Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Misbah Abedin..........Petitioner Vs. Muzmmil Ali and others…...... Respondents Judgment November15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocate with Abdul Quiyum, Probir ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Mohammad Hossain Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Housing, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ision upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 957. ......ision upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 957. ...... J Md. Abdul Matin J Mohammad Hossain ....................Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Housing, Housing and Settlement Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka & others ...................Respondents Judgment January 23, 2008. Lawyers......azrul Islam Talukder, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 344 of 2006. (From the judgment and order dated 23.08.2005 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 4503 of 2003.) Judgment &nbs..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 21
Nezma Khatun Chowdhury Vs. Abdul Khaleque, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... High Court Division. For the above reasons, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 954. ......11, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Aynuddin, Advocate, instructed by Ataur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 27 of 2001. (From th......orted in: V ADC (2008) 954. ......sary permission from Sylhet Pourashava and with full consent of the then landlord and as such there in no necessity of rebuilding of the suit shop, that initially the rent of the suit shop was Tk. 507-and ultimately it was increased Tk. 700/- per month; that the deposit of the respondent in Pub ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Fazor Ali Vs. Md. Marfat Ali and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 952. ...... at a correct decision. We therefore find no reason to interfere with the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 952. ....... ...... Lawyers Involved: Nurul Islam Bhuiya, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented- For Respondent Nos. 2-5 Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1146 of 2006. (From the judgment and order d..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Sree Santash Kumar Sarker and another Vs. Sree Shanker Chandra Mondal and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....he submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioners has got no merit and accordingly, the same is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: V ADC (2008) 948. ...... Mondal and others………………. .......Respondents Judgment October 2, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners Respondents-Not Represented. ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Sree Santash Kumar Sarker and another………………...... Petitioners Vs. Sre......t Nos.1 and 2 filed a suit being Other Class Suit No. 102 of 1991 in the 1st Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Rajshahi against the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and respondent Nos. 3-5 for cancellation of the compromise decree dated 25-10-1998 of Title Appeal No. 251 of 1996 passe..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26