Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Rabeya Khatun Vs. Sheikh Ashraful Islam and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....2.07.1985. Sara Khatun sold her purchase land to defendant No.2 and thereafter defendant Nos.2 and 3 after purchase owning and possessing the .26 decimals of land from the northern portion of the disputed Dags by constructing Golpata Sheds and the compromise decree passed in Title Suit No.143 of..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Ismail Miah Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....compensation only in terms of the lowest sale value of the area which is available on record and there is no necessity to enquire into the matter by way of evidence; that the writ petition involved a disputed question of facts is not correct at all, rather the issue was before the High Court Divis..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abul Kalam Engineer and another Vs. M Nasiruddin Howlader and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....endants transferred 12 decimals to Didarul Islam and his two brothers by three deeds as mentioned above and in 1996 said Islam Brothers jointly transferred said land to the plaintiffs. It is also not disputed that Islam brothers possessed said land on payment of rents in separate Khatian No. 188/1 a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
MA Kabir Chowdhury and others Vs. M Mahbubur Rahman Miah & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....perused all the papers annexed. We have also closely scrutinised the order dated 22-10-2001 passed by this Division in above Order No. 5742 of 2001. Material facts as stated above do not appear to be disputed no affidavit is filed controverting any of the above facts. Before we consider the merit of..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Altab Ali Vs. Rupjan Bibi and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ted 16.11.1966 A.D. Safar Ali also gifted western 51 decimals of the suit C.S. Plot to his son defendant No. 2 by executing another heba-bil-ewaz dated 18th Agrahayan, 1356 B.S. and also gifted non-disputed 29 decimals of land of the suit C.S. plot to his grand daughter defendant No.17 by executin..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Md. Shahabuddin Vs. Janata Bank, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....he General Manager who was their terminating authority under the said Regulations as well and that they were confirmed employees of the Janata Bank being members of the clerical staff. It is also not disputed that before the plaintiffs went on strike on 11.9.81 their services were declared as essent..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nur Ahmed Vs. Moktar Ahmed & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....sses. He submits that P.W. 2 Golam Hossain duly corroborated the statement of P.W. 1 the petitioner that P.W. 2 told him that the opposite parties drove out the labourers of the petitioner from the disputed land on 23.6.1982. The learned Munsif while rejecting the application under Order 9 Rule 13..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Abdul Mukit Chowdhury Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
.... who are required to do what they have omitted to do and failure on the part of the officials and the Authority to perform what they are required under law to perform is wholly unconnected with the disputed questions of fact involving in this case. Mr. Ahmed argues that Annexure 'A' issued by the ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Commissioner of Taxes Vs. Aleaf Enterprise, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... 30th of June 1967. Against the order of assessment the assessee preferred an appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and intimated the Income Tax Officer that it was prepared to pay the undisputed demands and in fact, deposited a sum of Rs 400 praying further that the balance of the tax ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Shahjahan Faraji and another Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....e district of Barisal. 2. Mr. Mostafa, the learned Advocate appearing for the accused-petitioners, submits that the accused-petitioner are residents of Bhola PS under the District of Bhola and the disputed land is situated within the jurisdiction of Bhola. It has been alleged that there is no pla..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Sarwar Garments Ltd. Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....d against the petitioner under sections 156(1), (14), (61), (62), (90). 6. The petitioner Company in the Writ Petition annexed various documents to establish the fact that after importation of the disputed goods by the petitioner they have in due course utilised those goods for manufacturing garm..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Zahid Hossain @ Paltu and others Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....e of the police in collusion with PW 3 and accused-appellant Tota due to enmities finds support from the above. We have already mentioned that the death of three unfortunate persons have neither been disputed nor denied. But it is also admitted that there is no ocular evidence in this case. PW 3 him..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Zakir Hossain Munshi Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ed in accordance with settled principles and not arbitrarily". 24. The legal principles on the basis of which the writ petitions were found not maintainable in the cases cited by Dr. Kamal are not disputed by us. But since the facts of the cases cited by Dr. Kamal are different from those in the ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 217
Azim vs. Naim Ara Begum, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....he premises of the plaintiff, which is situated within the Dhaka Metropolitan City. So, the contention of the petitioner’s learned Advocate to the effect than once the defendant was inducted in the disputed land with permission to raise construction, he is no more liable to be evicted therefrom, i..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Serajul Islam Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. Bangladesh Water Development Board & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Rule Nisi was contested by respondent Nos. 1‑5 and respondent No. 6, by filing two separate Affidavits-in-Opposition. 5. The case of the respondent Nos. 1‑5 is that, the petitioner has raised disputed questions of fact and, as such, the petition is not maintainable, and that at the time of p..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Ekushey Television Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....intainability of the Writ Petitions filed by the petitioner company through Mr. Abdus Salam, we like to dispose of this question first. It does not require any new exercise for the proposition that a disputed question of fact and the conflicting rights of two private individuals cannot be decided in..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 230
Jalal Uddin and others Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....admitted that he heard during investigation that the deceased returned back to his house from hospital prior to his death after being cured. This is all about the evidence on record. 16. It is not disputed that the deceased Babul is no more in the world, but the manner/cause of death of the decea..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Standard Bank Ltd. Vs. Tripos Engineering & Trading Company (GD) and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....e facts and circumstances of the case, the issuing Bank, Standard Bank, is entitled to withhold payment under the letters of credit in question to negotiating bank, Premier Bank. 29. Facts are not disputed. In both the suits, as transferees of the master letters of credit, the Modern Textiles Mil..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Ali Hossain (Md) and Other Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....pector of the Bureau of Anti-Corruption investigated the case seized alamats from the bank, examined witnesses, recorded their statements under section 101 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, sent the disputed account opening form, the standard signatures of Haji Asgar Miah, the signatures of accused..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Mirza Abdul Bari Beg and Others Vs. Zahidannessa and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e case of Shah Abdul Hamid affirmed the decree of the executing Court for possession by removal of the huts is based on correct interpretation of the law. 15. Now, in the case before me, it is not disputed that the lot in occupation of the judgment- debtors was allotted to the decree-holder by ex..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29